@ChasCaledon@Know_More_News People do ask him about China, he claims he trash talks them while also constantly praising them and suggesting we adopt their practices.
@benzedrine76820@DuncanBates1977@Know_More_News Complacency is what allowed them to garner that power, at least in America.
Money can't be taken with you but the promise of salvation or judgment can go a long way.
Weaponizing prophesies is not defensible
@cntbthatserious@neogoldenage@seethroughit2 Cultic is one word, he said he wanted to be the God of his own religion.
Pushes all the same antiwest duganist slop.
Is a chinamen under the ccp, glazes them nonstop, that alone should be enough for anyone to at the very least be suspicious.
He fits right in with jones & qtards
@benzedrine76820@Know_More_News What I would say is always a small possibility, is our own government.
Who wants a Christian revival and what better solution to that than to make a public figure a martyr for the nations faith.
An attempt to galvanize Christians in short.
That also isn't likely as it's risky
@benzedrine76820@Know_More_News Look at adam for example, he has reach, says everything nobody else will while remaining grounded and rational. He is the epitome of everything they don't want us to be, he has been deplatformed and debanked. But even he is not been a threat big enough to warrant it. Imo at least
@benzedrine76820@Know_More_News I mean tbf drone warfare has exponentially increased in the last few years.
We train Ukrainians and are working them into our own military as an example.
The odds that you can explain them vs them having been there for kirk are probably leaning towards a rational explanation.
@benzedrine76820@Know_More_News -that's the point of public debate, and it's rarely ever out of respect.
People need a bit thicker skin sometimes, because honestly adam wasn't that disrespectful.
I myself have a habit of being harsh but truthfully it's to avoid sugar coating or playing semantics
@benzedrine76820@Know_More_News Adams work by its nature creates an impass in debate, regardless of who platforms him the audience will still have to digest what Adam has to say.
While I'm sure he wouldn't turn down the opportunity I also don't see the necessity of playing nice, if people disagree that's fine
@benzedrine76820@Know_More_News He absolutely has the right to peddle conspiracies but we also have the same right to call that out.
Just like we did with Jones and all the Qtards.
If not then we have people running around actually believing jfks head is running the government and the Clinton's are in prison.
@benzedrine76820@Know_More_News Playcating to all the retards that think israel killed Charlie kirk, which in turn only helps them create more speech laws and gives them more support while making those who believe the claims look like kooks and spergs.
@TriskelionTriad More of an amalgamation of influential non jews who work to ultimately further "gods" divine plan aka they work for the jews who wrote said plan
@mjolnerwolf Not when their identity is predicated on their teachings and they wait for a jewish messiah.
Paul even says without them they will never experience the full riches of the covenant.
@sunuvajurnalist@asuka_aryan@CristinaVierus@RealAlexJones Again you misrepresenting my argument to fit your strawman isn't me not caring.
You can continue to double down, I'll keep responding.
You have the responsibility to address the actual topic but you'd rather stoop to a failed ad hominem attack.
@sunuvajurnalist@asuka_aryan@CristinaVierus@RealAlexJones You’re the one running the strawman. I said status, credentials, and family background don’t make an argument valid.
You just rebranded the same thing as ‘generational knowledge’ and pretended I was attacking something else. Changing the label doesn’t change what it is.
@sunuvajurnalist@asuka_aryan@CristinaVierus@RealAlexJones Calling someone a sociopath because they won’t accept your reframing isn’t analysis, it’s projection and a lazy ad hominem.
Real arguments don’t require armchair diagnoses.
Address the point or drop it.