AMY E JOHNSON

Banner photo: the 54th Pioneer Infantry at Newport News, VA arriving home from Europe on USS Artemis 26 June 1919. My grandfather is in there.

[AMY E JOHNSON @AEJ58]

@JeromeAdamsMD Why did you cherry pick ??? Dishonesty.

[Jersey Jackas_s 🕳️ @Oldglorycries]

@MeghanMcCain This from December

[AMY E JOHNSON @AEJ58]

@JeromeAdamsMD Do you benefit from the vaccine industry in any way?

[AMY E JOHNSON @AEJ58]

@ErlingStu How'd he get to be almost 3???!
Time for a sib to pull. 😊

[AMY E JOHNSON @AEJ58]

He 👇 handed out diapers and got a job as a senator.
America, no?

[Cory Booker @CoryBooker]

Bill Pulte has ZERO national security or intelligence experience — none.

Trump keeps installing unqualified loyalists whose only credential is blind allegiance and a willingness to do his dirty work.

This cronyism is unacceptable and puts the safety of Americans in jeopardy.

[Houman David Hemmati, MD, PhD @houmanhemmati]

As @BoredElonMusk & the data show, Raman’s late mail in ballot surge was fueled in large part by ballots from Skid Row.

Tens of thousands of homeless whose ballots are sent to central addresses (not the sidewalk) & can be filled out/returned by someone else.

Suspicious…

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

RFK Jr: “The Gardasil HPV vaccine — is 37 TIMES MORE LETHAL than the cancer it claims to prevent.”

“Gardasil is the single worst mass vaccine that we’ve ever seen. It targets millions of pre-teens & teens, whose risk of dying from cervical cancer is ZERO. Nobody in their right mind would ever take this vaccine if they actually read the clinical literature.”

Death rates in the Gardasil trials were 37 times the death rates for cervical cancer.
Your child is 37 times more likely to DIE from the shot than from cervical cancer itself.

And here’s the criminal part:
It was NEVER tested against a true inert placebo. Merck ran the studies, Merck paid for the studies, Merck decided what injuries were “just coincidences.” The control group got aluminum neurotoxins — the same injuries as the vaccine group — so Merck wrote them all off. No science. No safety. Just profit.

This is being pushed on our kids while Big Pharma laughs all the way to the bank.

Read the clinical data. Say NO to Gardasil.
Protect your children before it’s too late.

The new reformulated Gardasil-9 HPV Vaccine used Gardasil-1 HPV Vaccine as the placebo in clinical trial.

Ingredients in Gardasil-9 HPV Vaccine:
9 strains HPV proteins(found to contain DNA fragments)
Aluminum
Polysorbate 80
Sodium Borate(Borax)
GMO Yeast Protein(Saccharomyces Cerevisiae)
L-Histidine

Post marketing injuries listed in the package insert:
Blood & Lymphatic Leukemia
Pulmonary Emboli
Guillain Barre' Syndrome
Transverse Myelitis
Brachial Neuritis
Death
Autoimmune Diseases
Severe Anemia
Pancreatitis
Arthralgia & Myalgia
Encephalomyelitis
Paralysis
Seizure Disorder
Cellulitis
DVT Deep Vein Thrombosis
Blood Clots

[AMY E JOHNSON @AEJ58]

@normal_speed320 This photo is EPIC!
Foreground, background, middle-ground, just stellar!

Have a blast and get wet!

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

Turns out that @LeaderJohnThune was totally projecting when he said the SAVE Act was an influencer campaign.

Senator John Thune is compromised by a company that literally exists to sell access to himself.

Pass it on.

[Handre @Handre]

Milton Friedman's greatest regret.

The federal government discovered the perfect crime in 1943: make employers collect taxes before workers ever see their paychecks. You think you earn $60,000 per year, but you actually earn $75,000 and hand over $15,000 to politicians without ever touching it. The psychological difference is enormous.

Before payroll withholding, Americans wrote quarterly checks directly to the Treasury. Picture yourself sitting at your kitchen table, writing a $3,750 check to the IRS every three months. The pain was immediate and visceral. Politicians faced constant pressure to justify every dollar because citizens felt the extraction in real time.

Withholding transforms this concrete loss into an abstract accounting entry. Your employer becomes an unpaid tax collector, and you never experience the actual cost of government. Worse, most people celebrate their tax refunds as government generosity rather than recognizing them as interest-free loans they provided to politicians. The Treasury collects your money throughout the year, spends it immediately, then returns your own cash and receives gratitude.

This system enables the explosion in government spending you witness today. Defense contractors billing $640 for toilet seats, agricultural subsidies for corn syrup, and congressional salaries for 535 people who rarely show up to work. When taxation feels painless, voters stop demanding accountability for how their money gets spent.

Milton Friedman helped design withholding as a wartime emergency measure and later called it his greatest regret. Free market economists recognized that the psychological pain of direct taxation creates political pressure for fiscal restraint. The temporary always becomes permanent in government hands, and the emergency justification disappears while the extraction mechanism remains forever.

[Susan Shelley @Susan_Shelley]

Really, all you have to know about elections in California is that when voters in the city of Huntington Beach passed a charter amendment to enable the city to require voter ID in local elections, the state sued to block it and then passed a state law prohibiting voter ID.

[Kate @kate_p45]

Republican Senators, for the love of God…
STOP POSTING.
You’ve been in the Senate Majority for 15 months. WE THE PEOPLE gave you everything. We gave you the House and Senate so YOU ALL would unite behind President Trump and tram through the entire America First agenda, confirm every nominee, and crush radical Democrat obstruction.
Instead, because YOU chose John Thune as Senate Leader, everything is stalled, watered down, and sabotaged.
We don’t need more tweets about what “needs to happen.”
You have the power. Use it. Pass the agenda.
Confirm the nominees.
Stop the radicals.
STOP POSTING AND ACT.
The American people are watching.

[Matt Braynard @MattBraynard]

Let me add a little bit of clarity about what I’m talking about. It’s not customs or immigration; that’s not too bad, though it stinks that Americans can’t go through the same zippy lines the Chinese can. Given that we pay for most of these guys’ defense and let them waste money on their socialist medicine, I find this very insulting. One more reason to leave NATO.

But what really draws my ire about Frankfurt is this:

Even when flying on Germany’s premier airline, Lufthansa, or major partners like United or regional carriers like airBaltic, arrival and departure on every flight has involved several flights of stairs down to the tarmac, getting on a bus, and then climbing the stairs to board the airplane. It could be getting on or off a plane from a 777 Dreamliner; that’s still how you’re getting on or off the plane.

I’ve been in some tiny airports all over the United States, and short of just a couple of commuter routes, I don’t think I’ve ever gotten on or off a plane without a jet bridge.

And my wife has had to make this journey several times through Frankfurt with an infant, stroller, etc.

Further, the security line to get into the B terminal, which is completely unnecessary since you’ve never actually left the secure area and makes no sense at all, has exactly one lane run by two people whose native language is not German, English, or anything from the civilized world, and is like something you’d have experienced in the 1980s.

While I will concede that the Senator lounges have nice showers and sleeping areas, the food is about what you’d expect from Germany: lousy. And that’s only if you have access.

So, yeah, getting on and off your plane through a series of staircases and buses is ridiculous for anything that purports to be a first-world airport.

I’ve flown all over the world, been to around 50 countries and 100 airports in the United States, and Frankfurt takes the cake as the worst.

[Lisa Cusack @lisa_4_la]

In the minds of California Democrats everything is a “threat to Democracy” except for: third parties collecting limitless ballots, no ID verification, votes left unattended in ballot boxes which may or may not be set on fire, ballots cast by drugged out homeless people, and a month long after Election Day counting period so opaque it would make poll workers from the former Soviet Union blush.

[Jeremy Padawer @JeremyCom]

The odds of Nithya Raman receiving 40% of the vote yesterday are “LESS LIKELY than picking ONE GRAIN OF SAND on Earth dozens of times in a row.” I believe elections tend to be fair. Someone help me make sense of math that seems impossible…

I ASKED CHATGPT -
“What is the statistical likelihood that 40% of votes from a “new batch” of ballots go to a candidate who received 24% of votes from all other batches that represented 95% of counted electorate. Give me a % odds.”

The Answer (Part 1) -
“Assuming the candidate’s “true” share is 24%, the odds that a random new batch lands at 40% or higher depends on batch size:
50 ballots
0.88%
100 ballots
0.028%
200 ballots
0.00004%
500 ballots
~0.00000000000018%
1,000 ballots
~0.0000000000000000000000000035%”

My follow up -
“Assume 40,000 ballots. Are the odds one in a billion? One in a trillion? Worse? This seems to be happening in Los Angeles Mayor’s race between Mayor Bass, Spencer Pratt and Nithya Raman.”

The Answer (Part 2) -
“If the 40,000-ballot batch were drawn from the same population that produced 24% support in the other 95% of votes, then seeing 40% support in that batch would be far beyond “one in a billion” or “one in a trillion.”

75 standard deviations is in an entirely different universe.

The probability is approximately:

~10⁻¹²²⁰

or about

1 chance in 10¹²²⁰

That’s a number with roughly 1,220 zeros after the 1.

Statistically, if the batch were truly a random sample of the same electorate, the odds are so small that statisticians would effectively treat the event as impossible. The usual conclusion would not be “wow, what a lucky fluctuation,” but rather that the batch is not representative of the earlier ballots—for example, it came from a different geographic area, voting method, demographic group, or subset of voters.

So yes: much worse than one in a billion, much worse than one in a trillion, and vastly smaller than any probability encountered in ordinary statistical analysis.”

My follow up -
“More grains of sand on earth than the likelihood of this?”

The Answer (Part 3) -
“Yes. Much, much more.

Estimated grains of sand on Earth are often put around 10¹⁸ to 10²⁰.

Your odds example was roughly:

1 in 10¹²²⁰

So this is not just “less likely than picking one grain of sand on Earth.”

It’s more like picking the right grain of sand on Earth correctly over and over again dozens of times in a row.”

Sincerely,
Jeremy Padawer
https://t.co/POrFyAfNhH

@spencerpratt @BoredElonMusk @Hotshot_Movie @415FirePhoto
#losangeles #la #fyp #mayor

[AMY E JOHNSON @AEJ58]

@mele4america @DawnFantasia_NJ @NJGOP Oh no, that's terrible. People need the truth about positions on the issues and the issues are so very important, especially now.
Yes, your team should be on that already.
Maybe Michael can help? @wakeupnj

[AMY E JOHNSON @AEJ58]

@NewYearsDani One was enough for them?

[AMY E JOHNSON @AEJ58]

@NewYearsDani He's the best grandson! 🥰

[AMY E JOHNSON @AEJ58]

@NewYearsDani ☺️
Beautiful boy!