@CardinOvO All these points are irrelevant to the original sin of stealing all that work/property. I dont care at this point about "the creative process" or "is ai good enough". We can deal with that once fair remuneration and consent of the original sin of ai training is fixed.
@thefinnmckenty "Why are you the one who decides what ethics and morality are? "
"That aside, this is all getting litigated so Iβll leave it to them."
Lets not pretend that you don't have an angle here. Just making excuses so you can keep doing the exploitative unethical thing.
@synaesthesiajp "They think the AI is not creative and destroys the value of creativity." Because tech billionaires stole everyones work, copyright washed it, and leases it back to ppl. Its not that hard to understand my guy.
@ednewtonrex@carlfranzen@bfl_ai@robrombach@BrooksBarnes Are we losing the public on the original sin of genAi training data ? The news is always about how good/ bad the quality is, or job replacement,or the environment, etc. But never about the theft of the training data. The companies are just ignoring those that ask.
@TheMG3D The Jorge situation was such a clusterfuck and nothing positive will come out of that for creatives, and then another of the series ( buzzfeed / cupcake) has had the creator of the character pushed out and ignored. She hates that her character is involved with AI now.
@Angaisb_@BerwaldJoshua@Matan_Vilensky Comparing typing a prompt in to photography or digital art shows me how little you know about those two skill sets. Because you know so little about the creative process you don't know any better.
@ZeroDeusExploit @duskbladex @Rahll@DougTenNapel "Intellectual "property" is anticapitalist and antihuman."
Sadly for you just stating things does not make it true.