It’s actually wild how most of my feed is blatantly incorrect information meant to stir engagement (and probably meant to confuse impressionable, sheltered people)
What was saved here? Ohhhh right profit profit got it got it riiiiiight
I think where I differ from many media consumers is that I seek out content that doesn't just tell me what I already know or confirm my priors. I gravitate to media that forces me to learn new things & challenges my assumptions - and I increasingly try to do reporting that does that, which I realize pisses off the very loud & vocal please-just-confirm-my-priors crowd that's disproportionately represented in online comment threads etc.
I'm not making a judgment on what's better or worse here. But just on a really personal level, I'm genuinely bored with confirm-my-priors media even if it's more monetizeable, and I've gradually divested myself from it & am not interested in producing it. I'm more interested in exploring uncomfortable questions that I don't know the answers to (see the latest episode of our podcast Lever Time). My guess is a lot of people are silently doing the same.
"Internal messages from Live Nation reveal two execs talking about "robbing [fans] blind,"" per MorePerfectUnion.
“These people are so stupid. I almost feel bad taking advantage of them," one said.