Det gör ont i mig att se bruksorter förfalla, hus stå tomma och bygder sakta dö ut.
Den enskilt största anledningen är att industrier som en gång höll liv i bygden inte längre är lönsamma. Produktion flyttar utomlands eller lägger ner. Hade bara jobben funnits hade folk stannat kvar.
Därför lanserar jag Chang-paketet med politiska reformer som jag drar ur arslet på stående fot:
1. Skapa en nationell karta över bruksorter som sakta dör, lite liknande kartan över ”utsatta områden” fast här fokuserar vi på helt andra parametrar. Kartan ska göra tydliga geografiska indelningar, som minst kommun-nivå men kanske mer granulärt i vissa fall (en kommun kan i det stora hela må okej men ha en ort eller två som är döende).
2. Skapa ett särskilt utdelningsutrymme med halverad skatt på kapitalinkomster, kopplat till lönekostnader enligt 3:12-reglerna för fasta arbetsställen i de här områdena. Lönekostnader i stora välmående staden ger det vanliga utdelningsutrymmet, detta ska alltså vara ett särskilt utdelningsutrymme och inget annat.
3. Slopa arbetsgivaravgifterna helt upp till en viss mängd prisbasbelopp i lönekostnad och år, för arbeten med fast arbetsställe i de här områdena.
4. Automatiska villkorade uppehållstillstånd för den invandrare som tagit ett arbete i en sådan här ort. En CNC-operatör från Moldavien får stanna så länge han/hon arbetar på orten. Efter en viss tid och/eller mängd inbetalda skatter kan det villkorade uppehållstillståndet övergå till permanent (krav på vandel, kunna språk osv gäller som vanligt).
5. Reducerad bolagsskatt genom en jämkning mot allmännyttiga åtgärder. Exempelvis: För att få liv i Knäckebröhults avsomnade bruk behöver vi asfaltera om vägen till industriområdet, idag är potthålen så stora att det krävs bandvagnar och njurbälte för att ta sig fram.
Kostnaden för att fixa till skiten är 2 miljoner, pengar som kommunen inte har. Brukspatronen kan då ta beslut om att själv bekosta renoveringen av denna infrastruktur, något som även kommer fler till del. Dessa 2 miljoner kan sedan jämkas på bolagsskatten.
Ett krav ska vara att investeringen är allmännyttig och inte något som endast gynnar bruket. T ex renovera en hamn, en järnvägslinje, dränera en våtmark osv osv.
Ja, ni fattar. Har du fler förslag, kom gärna med dessa. Men det viktiga är att tilta kalkylen så det blir attraktivt att börja investera och producera i de här bruksorterna igen. Tjänar folk pengar har de råd att renovera hus.
Flyttar det in folk stiger huspriserna och bygden för lite nytt blod.
Vi får en positiv spiral igen som gynnar alla. Förhoppningsvis.
Helen Andrews just exposed a brutally effective tactic in modern politics:
Women have a powerful, evolutionarily wired instinct to care for the helpless — and “wokeness” weaponizes it by framing every issue as “protect the vulnerable” (portrayed as helpless babies).
She explains:
This caring impulse is glaringly Darwinian — women see weakness and want to nurture.
But when political causes are sold as “care for the oppressed,” that instinct kicks in automatically, shutting down debate.
“Minorities are babies.”
That’s the deeper frame — and it works because the caring response overrides everything else.
Andrews isn’t denying the instinct’s beauty — she’s warning how easily it’s hijacked.
Brutal insight or uncomfortable truth?
Men: Ever noticed how “protect the helpless” framing ends discussions?
Women: Does the caring instinct explanation ring true — or feel like a stretch?
Major Study Challenges Alcohol’s Long-Held Beliefs
For years, we were told one glass per week might protect the brain.
An extensive analysis of 2.4 million people found the opposite.
Drinking ANY amount of alcohol was linked to a higher risk of a memory-destroying brain condition…
👇
https://t.co/4g9uFtDOBk
Archbishop Desmond Tutu: "if you want peace, you don't speak to your friends. You talk to your enemies"
- The criminalisation of diplomacy is evident when the political-media establishment believes it is immoral to speak with adversaries
Walking may be more powerful than antidepressants.
A 2024 review of 8,600 people found it significantly reduces depression and anxiety—regardless of age or pace.
No side effects. No withdrawal. Just movement.
And that’s only 1 of 7 science-backed reasons to start walking today.
🧵 THREAD
SSU:s vulgärretorik med en så kallad ”Wallenbergskatt” inger inget förtroende nu när vi i snabb takt ska rusta upp det svenska försvaret. Vänstern måste börja ta in att svenska företag utgör ryggraden för det svenska välfärdssamhället, de bidrar till ekonomisk tillväxt, investeringar och framväxten av nya jobb.
PRIORITERA, INTE MASS-SPENDERA.
Tidöpartierna har nu beslutat att låna 300 miljarder kronor till det svenska försvaret. Det beskrivs som en historisk satsning – men det är också ett historiskt svek mot framtida generationer. Partierna väljer att finansiera nationens säkerhet med skuld i stället för ansvar.
Detta är inte försvarsvänlig politik. Det är ekonomisk lättja.
Att Sverige behöver ta eget ansvar för sin försvarsförmåga är självklart. Men när staten redan slösar bort hundratals miljarder varje år på ineffektiva myndigheter, bistånd utan kontroll, symbolpolitik och överbyråkratisering – då är det oförsvarligt att belåna svenska medborgare istället för att prioritera om.
Medborgerlig Samling har visat att det går.
I vår genomlysning av statsbudgeten har vi identifierat hundratals miljarder som kan återföras till statens kärnuppgifter – dit pengarna en gång faktiskt var avsedda. Det går att frigöra resurser utan att höja skatter och utan att belåna framtiden.
Vi har pekat ut över 100 myndigheter som svällt på bekostnad av bland annat försvaret. De bör bantas kraftigt eller avvecklas helt innan staten drar på sig nya skulder. Vi har visat hur skattepengar rinner iväg till ineffektiva bidragssystem, identitetspolitiska prestigeprojekt och meningslös kulturpolitik – pengar som istället borde gå till försvaret och andra kärnuppgifter för staten.
Lägg därtill den växande byråkratin i välfärden – en administrativ överbyggnad som kostar mer än den ger. Även här finns stora belopp att omprioritera.
Det är fullt möjligt att rusta upp – utan att belåna våra barn. Men det kräver mod! Det kräver ledarskap. Det kräver att man orkar stå emot särintressen, myndighetschefer och vänsterns moraliserande indignation.
Tyvärr har Tidöpartierna visat att de saknar det ledarskap som krävs. När det kom till kritan valde man den enkla vägen: att skuldsätta oss.
Konsekvensen blir att våra barn och barnbarn får betala – inte bara räntor och amorteringar, utan även notan för försämrad kreditvärdighet, minskad tillväxt och förlorad framtidstro.
Det är dessutom ironiskt att Tidöpartierna motiverar massiva lån med att de inte vill "tränga ut" välfärden. När tidigare regeringar dragit ned på vårt försvar har nämligen resurserna inte gått till välfärden – de har gått till en ohämmad expansion av statsapparaten och byråkratin.
Det är därför vi nu står med ett svagt försvar. Att först slösa – och sedan låna – är en politik som varje svensk familj känner igen som ansvarslös.
Medborgerlig Samling säger: gör jobbet! Skär bort det som inte är nödvändigt. Sätt Sveriges säkerhet först – inte genom lån, utan genom att våga och orka prioritera.
Det är så vi bygger ett starkt försvar, en stark ekonomi och en hållbar framtid – på riktigt.
Förändring - på riktigt!
Daniel Sonesson
Partiledare, Medborgerlig Samling
#OmstartSverige #MED2026
NEW ARTICLE: IVERMECTIN and FENBENDAZOLE Testimonial - 60 year old USA man diagnosed with Stage 4 Prostate Cancer Gleason 9 and bone metastases. PSA dropped from 141 to 0.25 in 3 months!
"He's 60 years old and in good health overall. He had a physical 5 months ago and all of his labs were fine"
Life can change very quickly.
"He started feeling achy and tired a few weeks ago and went to the doctor where they did blood work that revealed that his PSA was 141. In April, it was 3.4. They've done a CT scan and a bone scan which revealed widespread osteoblastic metastases."
A patient of mine was diagnosed with sudden onset Stage 4 Prostate Cancer, Gleason 9 with PSA 141.
That is an emergency situation. We didn't waste any time and started:
Ivermectin 1mg/kg/day
Fenbendazole 1332 mg/day
Oncologist started hormone blockers Orgovyx and Nubeqa, then added Taxotere 6 weeks later.
RESULTS:
In about 3 months, his PSA dropped from 141 to 0.25, that's a 99.8% drop.
Stage 4 Prostate Cancer, Gleason 9, metastatic to bones is something you want to get under control as quickly as possible.
Ivermectin and Fenbendazole allow you to do that.
Synergy with hormone blockers.
Synergy with chemo.
Although Oncologists are not allowed to help their cancer patients, adding Ivermectin and Fenbendazole dramatically enhances cancer cell killing - and that’s what you want in a case of extremely aggressive Gleason 9 Prostate cancer like this.
Next, we are going to get some imaging results on this case. But for now, this patient has the best outcome possible in the shortest time frame possible.
A 99.8% drop in cancer markers in 3 months.
I do this so often, it has become second nature. 😃
And I do this with the boot of Alberta's Government of Premier Danielle Smith firmly planted on my neck, my accounts frozen, my funds stolen, my family harassed.
Ok, that gets a little tiring. Give me a big Cancer Centre Premier @ABDanielleSmith, instead of threatening and harassing my family. Let me do what I do best.
I've said it before, no one is going to stop the Ivermectin Cancer revolution and no one is going to stop me. 💪
Welcome to the largest Ivermectin Cancer Clinic in the world. With daily success stories not found anywhere else... 👏
Article Link in photo to avoid shadowban, just re-type the URL in the first photo at the top, into your browser to access.
@joerogan
I Wore a Niqab as a Man.. And It Broke Me
Women are not candy, diamonds, or pearls... they’re human! So why, in 2025, are people still trying to tell them what to wear? Share this video if you agree!
Follow @buildersmideast for more! 🙌
Today I'll show You the lifestyle of Ukrainian officials in France.
After the material was published in Ukrainian language, Zelenskyy started pressure on my colleagues from "Ukrainian Truth" Media (sponsored by Soros).
But we will fight!
And we need Your support.
Please like and share.
1/10
Vladimir Putin did not wake up on 24 February 2022 and decide, “I think I’ll invade eastern Ukraine today,” nor was the US campaign to expand NATO into Ukraine a last-minute maneuver. (US State Department documents show Ukraine’s future membership was discussed as early as 1994.)
The Road to War… in the Russian Borderlands:
9 Feb 1990: In a deal approved by Mikhail Gorbachev, the last leader of the Soviet Union, as a quid pro quo for accepting German reunification in NATO, Secretary of State James Baker’s pledged that NATO would not expand “one inch to the east.”
Columbia professor Jeffrey Sachs and Chicago professor John Mearsheimer argue that during the lengthy negotiations on German unification, US, European and German leaders made explicit assurances to Gorbachev that there would be no future NATO expansion eastward.
Even if only verbal and not in a formal treaty, Gorbachev understood the assurances as a “binding agreement.” Subsequently, Soviet leaders made decisions on that basis and acted on them - withdrawing the Red Army from Germany and dissolving the Warsaw Pact.
1996 Election Year: With an eye on the Polish and Eastern European vote in northern Illinois, Bill Clinton campaigned on enlarging NATO into Eastern Europe. (Bill Clinton carried Illinois and handily defeated Bob Dole.)
12 March 1999: The Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland join NATO. A weakened post-Soviet Russia, led by Boris Yeltsin, whose economy was controlled by a bevy of Oligarchs, could do nothing about it. Powerless, Yeltsin was “infuriated” with “his friend Bill Clinton” for breaking with past US assurances on NATO expansion.
31 Dec 1999: After years of heavy drinking and suffering from health problems, Boris Yeltsin unexpectedly resigned. Vladimir Putin becomes Prime Minister of Russia. Yeltsin’s last words to Putin: “Take care of Russia.”
29 March 2004: George W. Bush is now president, and seven more Eastern European countries join NATO: Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia - largest wave of NATO enlargement in its history.
April 2008: At the NATO summit in Bucharest, George W. Bush announces that Ukraine and Georgia are on an “immediate path to NATO.” German Chancellor Angela Merkel: “I was very sure that Putin was not going to just let that happen. From his perspective, this would be a declaration of war,” she recalled in 2022.
2008: Bill Burns, ambassador to Russia, sent a memo to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice: Across the board, he wrote, the Russian political class told him, “Ukraine is the reddest of red lines” – “Nyet means nyet.”
22 Feb 2014: Just as the Sochi Winter Olympics got underway, the “Maidan” coup in Kyiv erupted in violence. State Department official Virginia Nuland boasted that since the 2004-2005 “Orange Revolution,” the US had spent $5 billion on regime change in Ukraine.
NATO rooftop snipers killed both protestors and police, forcing Ukraine’s democratically elected pro-Russian leader Viktor Yanukovych to flee. In response to Yanukovych’s downfall, Putin stepped up Russian support for Russian-speaking separatist rebels in the Donbass, while US accelerated its efforts to arm and train Ukraine’s army.
2 May 2014: The Donbass crisis point of no return: Bussed to Odessa from Kyiv, Right Sector thugs carrying baseball bats confront ethnic Russians protesting the coup in Kyiv. When protestors fled into the city’s Trade Unions House, the building was set on fire. Forty-eight people that day were burned or bludgeoned to death.
11 Feb 2015: Putin and then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko meet with French President Francois Hollande and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Minsk, Belarus, known as the multi-year Minsk accords.
The leaders agreed to a deal that would have ended fighting in eastern Ukraine - granted autonomy to the Russian-speaking Donbass. Successive Ukrainian governments, however, refused to implement the accord. German Chancellor Merkel later admitted that Minsk was a stall tactic to allow the West to build Ukraine’s army up to NATO standards.
31 Dec 2016, New Year’s Eve, twenty days before the incoming Trump admin, Lindsey Graham, with a bi-partisan group of US Senators, visited Ukrainian troops on the civil war Line of Contact, encouraging them to take the war to Russia: "Your war is our war…"
17 Dec 2021: Team Biden rejects Putin’s proposed mutual security accords that would have left “neutral” Ukraine intact. For years, Russia tried to convince successive US administrations that Ukraine was off-limits to NATO membership, but Russian concerns were brushed aside. In December 2021, Team Biden insisted, “Russia doesn’t say who can join NATO.”
18 Feb 2022: During the Winter Olympics in China, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) documented that Ukraine was ramping up artillery attacks along the Line of Contact. (Since the 2014 coup in Kyiv, the Armed forces of Ukraine, including the Neo-Nazi Banderites, had killed 14,000 Donbass ethnic Russians.
19 Feb 2022: Invited to speak at the Munich Security Conference, Ukrainian President Zelensky said "Ukraine will get and deploy nuclear missiles."
20 Feb 2022: On CBS’ 60 Minutes, final day of the Olympics in China, Ukraine’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Dmytro Kuleba said, “Ukraine will never honor the Minsk cease fire.”
21 Feb 2022: Russia captured a Ukrainian soldier, killed five others as they crossed over the border into Rostov. Russia learned the invasion of Donetsk city was imminent and recognized the breakaway Donbass and Luhansk oblasts as independent republics.
24 Feb 2022: With 90,000 troops, Russia launched its limited “Special Military Operation” - not a "full scale invasion." Citing the UN principle, “Responsibility to Protect,” Russia finally intervened in the eight-year Donbass crisis after all prospects for diplomacy had failed.
March-April 2022, week six of the invasion, Russia and Ukraine convened peace talks in Istanbul. Ukrainian diplomat Oleksandr Chalyi said the two sides “managed to find a compromise” - and “were very close to finalizing the war with a peaceful settlement.”
Later, Chalyi recalled, “Putin tried to do everything possible to conclude an agreement with Ukraine.” But Joe Biden and Boris Johnson, who flew to Kyiv, urged Zelensky to “keep fighting; we have your back.” Under pressure, Zelensky chose to walk away from peace.
The future of the world order may not hinge on who wins the war on the Russian steppes, unless, of course, events spiral into a nuclear catastrophe - a scenario that cannot be ruled out; however, right now, for Russia, Ukraine and NATO, there is no escaping the battle, and, as of 3 March 2025, no one is getting ready to back down.
The EU leaders and Zelensky having fancy dinners while men die in trenches.
How many parents will never see their son again?
How many children will never see their father?
Andra länder har visat att det finns fungerande metoder för att bryta gängens makt, men Sverige tvekar fortfarande att använda dem fullt ut. Varför inte lära sig av andra länder kring vad som kan vara väldigt effektiva metoder för att krossa gängkriminalitet?
I shared this note with the Washington Post team this morning:
I’m writing to let you know about a change coming to our opinion pages.
We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets. We’ll cover other topics too of course, but viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others.
There was a time when a newspaper, especially one that was a local monopoly, might have seen it as a service to bring to the reader’s doorstep every morning a broad-based opinion section that sought to cover all views. Today, the internet does that job.
I am of America and for America, and proud to be so. Our country did not get here by being typical. And a big part of America’s success has been freedom in the economic realm and everywhere else. Freedom is ethical — it minimizes coercion — and practical — it drives creativity, invention, and prosperity.
I offered David Shipley, whom I greatly admire, the opportunity to lead this new chapter. I suggested to him that if the answer wasn’t “hell yes,” then it had to be “no.” After careful consideration, David decided to step away. This is a significant shift, it won’t be easy, and it will require 100% commitment — I respect his decision. We’ll be searching for a new Opinion Editor to own this new direction.
I’m confident that free markets and personal liberties are right for America. I also believe these viewpoints are underserved in the current market of ideas and news opinion. I’m excited for us together to fill that void.
Jeff