Agents Dispatch

Use any model, any time, any where, across multiple projects & swap between providers within the same chat. Control any AI from your phone.

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

@KobeissiLetter LOL, the real permanent underclass has begun. Welcome to a dystopian nightmare.

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

@Tectone Anything the Government pays for goes up in cost, its a law of economics.

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

@Landeur Just gotta vote harder simple as

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

@PolitlcsUK Shabana Mahmood, a proper English name and a proper English lass.

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

@ukhomeoffice @DefenceHQ This is a war crime.

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

@milesdeutscher But think of the trillions the tech oligarchs will add to their market caps using their exclusive access, and the panopticon surveillance grid the Government will be able to build.

AI folx are so pessimistic, never looking on the bright side.

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

@romanhelmetguy We don't need small minded ideas like this. You need to think bigger, the buildings should be seized and given to the homeless and drug addicts.

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

@sama Permanent underclass unlocked.

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

It won't stay like that for long, just like Glasswing more and more oligarch companies will be added, and some of these companies spend -hundreds of millions- on tokens. Then like I said, it finally gets released to the public, and this insider group gets access to the next level of intelligence.

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

The AI scene, circa 2027

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

They make massive money on the corporate partners who are paying premium API usage. It's not permanent, they eventually provide access to the plebs but that 3-6 month gap where a select few have extra capability are enough to cement the underclass. These tech oligarchs will systematically destroy all competitors and wipe out all startups with this lead, which will be perpetual in the sense that when you're getting access to the Mythos, they're already getting access to the new Mythos++. A small oligarchy class will have a constant lead on the plebs.

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

Imagine you want to start a new AI company to develop frontier models. You spend billions. You succeed. You have a new SOTA model to release. But you're not allowed. This regulation has just made it impossible for any competitors in the space unless they're already trillion dollar companies who can afford to have their only product locked up for months or forever.

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

@beffjezos Think about how fast the tech oligarchs who have exclusive access will be able to obliterate all these tech startups.

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

@MatthewBerman @AlThingsF1nanc3 Ya they're cementing a permanent underclass, and the precedent is set. A handful of top tech companies (and gov) will have months of frontier access before the underclass, cementing their lead, and wiping out all small competition. The dystopia we're headed for will be total.

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

@nicdunz Step One: be a billion dollar company

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

@ChatGPTapp *For tech oligarchs and Feds

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

@OpenAI Translated by Grok:
"Checkout this fantastic model that tech oligarchs and the Feds will have access to, plebs."

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

🤣 Never deleting this app

[local maxima @local_maxi]

@OpenAI Now name the models after the 3 biggest crypto scams

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

@thsottiaux This is 100% PR hand waving, if you buy it you're a fool.

https://t.co/OTlAiLhyWb

[Agents Dispatch @AgentsDispatch]

I think very intentional (they may attempt PR and call it a "bug" later after they've caused a ton of upgrades). It all started after Fable left, they probably saw usage spike after the Fable release initially took users away, and then they start ratcheting down to get people to upgrade after it left and usage returned. They need quick upgrades because if Fable returns people likely won't upgrade, and they also know their own timelines for any Fable rival. When dealing with huge numbers of users (100s of millions) you move the new needle a few percent and you've generated hundreds of millions potentially billions in revenue. They would be almost negligent as a company if they -were not- doing this.

The worst part is that they can literally use their own AI to determine the exact amount of pain needed to push someone higher. Especially if someone appears to ONLY be using openai, they don't have an alternative so you can apply more pressure to those people to upgrade. Without a doubt they're testing probably dozens of variations of this pain-to-conversion pipeline.

I do believe that like all AB testing systems, its probably not applied equally to all users, but different segments based on their usage history and the likelihood of causing an upgrade.