Mofollistic creatures falsely #imprisoned, #insulted and #tortured me for 4 years.
Used criminal methods including #assault and #theft to destroy the evidence.
And then put up f faces, emit f voices to pretend they are the ones who should feel #outraged. Shamless treacherous .
Maskerede betjente uden kendelse smadrer min dør pga yndlingstals- og journalisme-kriminalitet.
I morges kl 0947, da jeg var på vej i bad hørte jeg først ét højt brag. Derefter kiggede jeg i dørspionen og så en gruppe sortklædte og maskerede mænd (mundbind og mørke solbriller) på vej op af trappen.
De begyndte straks at hamre på lejlighedens dør med en rambuk uden på noget tidspunkt at ringe på eller give sig til kende.
Kort efter var de inde i lejligheden (det er ca. her videoen starter) og de lagde mig promte i håndjern.
Næsten alle 8-10 betjente var iført mundbind og mørke briller - helt klart maskering som højst sandsynligt er ulovligt.
De kunne ikke fremvise nogen kendelse og ville ikke sige, hvad jeg var sigtet for. "Det ville tilgå".
Lejlighedens overvågning blev herefter pillet ned af betjentene af "sikkerhedsmæssige hensyn".
Kort efter blev jeg kørt på Bellahøj Politistation, mens lejligheden blev endevendt.
Her blev jeg fotograferet, rullet fingeraftryk og DNA skrabet - uagtet at politiet har det hele i forvejen.
Først til sidst (ved 16 tiden) blev jeg informeret om, hvad jeg var sigtet for: at have det forkerte yndlingstal og at forsøge at interviewe statsministeren om afviklingen af danskernes privatliv gennem forbud mod kryptering og permanent PET-overvågning af alle danskere.
Jeg blev løsladt kl 1640 og kunne begive mig hjem til fods.
Selve anholdelsen betragter jeg som ulovlig. Man må ikke anholde til afhøring - det følger af retsplejelovens paragraf 750. De har allerede både fingeraftryk, foto og DNA - og sagen har intet som helst at gøre med fysiske spor.
Det er også stærkt tvivlsomt, om den helt uvarslede smadring af døren har levet op til proportionalitetsprincippet i dansk ret. Jeg har simpelthen svært ved at se, hvordan nogle opslag på nettet kan retfærdiggøre det. Beviset er opslagene - ikke noget i lejligheden. Det virker mere som ren straf uden fagligt belæg.
Jeg er også ret sikker på, at politiet har tiltvunget sig adgang til min kærestes telefon og derigennem slettet størstedelen af den optagede video. For der gik et par minutter, før de tog kameraerne ned (og tog dem med(!)).
Hvorfor nedenstående video som den eneste ikke blev slettet, ved jeg ikke.
Jeg har det godt, men er en anelse chokeret over politiets helt uproportionale og brutale fremfærd.
Some of what happened lately:
1. under some particular effects again, in addition to what I suffer almost every day.
2. air felt strange time and again when I rest in a tent
3. what happened in the videos
#stateBackedCrimes#gangstalking#drugged#集団ストーカー#��スト
False equivalence is one of the most reliably deployed tools in the manipulator’s arsenal.
It’s simple, requires little to no intelligence, (narcissists typically learn this as children along with lying) and it’s an effective noise maker and diversion tactic.
Here’s what’s actually happening:
A false equivalence doesn’t engage your argument. It replaces it. By drawing a superficial comparison between two things that aren’t actually comparable, the manipulator sidesteps the content of what you said entirely.
They don’t have to address the substance because they’ve already framed it as equivalent to something dismissible or previously accepted.
You raise a legitimate concern. They say, “Well, you’re not perfect either.” On the surface it looks like a counterargument.
It isn’t. It’s a redirect from the merit of your point to the moral standing of the person making it.
Cont.
Mofollistic creatures falsely #imprisoned, #insulted and #tortured me for 4 years.
Used criminal methods including #assault and #theft to destroy the evidence.
And then put up f faces, emit f voices to pretend they are the ones who should feel #outraged. Shamless treacherous .
When a narcissist (human predator) is exposed, an atomic bomb-like attack follows.
The level of aggression exerted, the breadth of misleading information (lies) espoused about the exposer, the attempted annihilation of the exposer is pathologically extreme and far-reaching.
It is far more than a tantrum. It is an explosion in a multitude of directions.
The not-so-bright dark personalities are usually not as successful though with their campaign of destruction as those that are higher functioning.
They trip themselves up with their baseless powerful ego, their limited influence and in many cases their criminal backgrounds. They basically believe they are smarter than they are. While they are still dangerous, all of this works against them.
Higher functioning dark personalities, those that are doctors, lawyers, CEO's, board directors, accountants, 'leaders' in religion etc are able to cause so much damage through astute application of influencing skills and covert techniques of manipulation.
Higher functioning dark personalities can influence so many. The risks are huge in not 'seeing' them and preventing the far-reaching harm they are capable of.
There’s two crucial elements in preventing harm to yourself and other others. Know the red flags (in my book, Human Predators). Do research.
Understand this: To a narcissist, not giving them what they feel entitled to is an attack. Silence is an attack. A polite boundary is an attack. Simply not performing the reaction they expected is an attack. They actually feel entitled over you and your life.
They don’t experience your restraint as restraint. They experience it as aggression. And they will respond to it like aggression.
So when you finally do respond — no matter how politely, no matter how reasonably, no matter how carefully — that response is what they came for.
That response, no matter how polite or reasonable, becomes the excuse they were looking for to go into full attack mode.
Narcissists often target the most psychologically developed people in their environment. Emotional depth, moral consistency, and self-awareness are threatening to someone whose social survival depends on nobody looking too closely. The attack isn’t random. It’s strategic. Tear down the person whose very existence is an implicit contrast.
@H5jo9jCcGhbnfxo These are not neutral actions. They are designed to destabilise the mind.
Malice becomes institutional when it is routinised.
This is #persecution, not policing.
So they engineered #invisibleViolence — the most insidious form.
https://t.co/4QW8O1sxr9
@H5jo9jCcGhbnfxo Its purpose was to break a person’s stability, credibility, relationships, and sense of reality without leaving evidence.
That is the definition of #malicious.
It is not #surveillance for security.
It is harm as policy.
The narcissist can only understand your behavior through their own mentality.
They don’t have access to a genuinely other perspective. Everything gets filtered through what they would mean if they did what you did.
When you set a boundary, they read it as aggression — because that’s what their boundaries are.
When you go quiet, they read it as punishment — because that’s what their silence is.
When you pull away, they read it as a power move — because that’s what their distance is.
It’s not just projection. It’s a failure of imagination so complete that they can’t conceive of motivations they don’t personally possess.
Genuine hurt looks like manipulation to them.
Authentic self-protection looks like retaliation.
Honesty looks like an attack.
The irony is that this makes them confidently wrong about you.
They don’t wonder if they’ve misread you. They KNOW you and what you’re doing. And what “you’re doing” is exactly what they would be doing in your place.