@LegolasVS@TSD_NMBACKUP@Suni_rayy No, the reason why gojo knocked him tf out is because sukuna chose to not mid diff him during the clashes. You don't understand his character, or you just choose not to until it convivences you.
@UltraRaiyu@TSD_NMBACKUP 1. Idk why people do this. He still killed gojo and beat him. "beat on the entire fight" he was on offense till chpt 230 and only stopped because he was holding back, which fucked him up.
2. He wasn't going all out. He was able to tempo shift maki to where she couldn't react.
@IkenUltimatum@milks_one@48_mugiwara then he literally wins?? Dude what ru talking about idc about whatever vague point you wanna compare if it doesn't mean sukuna loses😭
@IkenUltimatum@milks_one@48_mugiwara “An edge out” ??
Wdym it wouldn’t be an overwhelming issue? If sukuna preforms better in cqc he lands his domain almost every time
@IkenUltimatum@milks_one@48_mugiwara You are aware that gojo was using blue in cqc combat against sukuna and wasn’t overwhelming him lime you described? Sure he had an advantage, but he was still just barely able to destroy his domain. In true form this advantage would he less notable
@dbl1e9k@q_kamui Now he doesn’t have that fear, so he’s fighting without accounting for damage. This does not mean he was holding back during the fight, he was just fighting like he would in base while heavily amped. You cannot quantify how much better hakari would do if he was fighting like this
@IkenUltimatum@milks_one@48_mugiwara Also can you prove that TF sukuna (who is way stronger than meguna in cqc) will preform at a similar level to meguna, the physically weakest form of sukuna?
Can you disprove the fact that sukuna’s 4 arms can and will be used for defense/attacking simultaneously?
@IkenUltimatum@milks_one@48_mugiwara Maybe it’s because you self defeated your argument here?
You said gojo is barely capable of destroying sukuna’s domain. Sukuna’s true form would do better than this by a long mile. You never refuted the claims I made regarding his physicals, is that you silently agreeing?