@JM_neutral @AnonVendy @deejayedee@DianaMiller5 I think we've come far enougy as a species that we needn't allow something as basic as sex to even contain the option of, what I believe and understand as, potential condemnation.
@JM_neutral @AnonVendy @deejayedee@DianaMiller5 Yes but you can't prevent every instance, something will slip through.
Abortions also typically only take place as a matter of preference at before 12 weeks.
@JM_neutral @AnonVendy @deejayedee@DianaMiller5 I cant, in my eyes, claim superior value to what might be to what currently is.
I value the mother's right to refuse motherhood. Invest in the children that are already alive.
@JM_neutral @AnonVendy @deejayedee@DianaMiller5 Because you cant always prevent. But removing the option, damning someone (who potentially doesnt want it) to give birth is its own ethical issue. Something I believe is worse than the issue you present.
@JM_neutral @AnonVendy @deejayedee@DianaMiller5 Because there is a clear link between access to these things and reduced unwanted pregnancies.
Great, problem solved.
Anti-abortion is not pro-life. Its short sighted and ignores the actual problem.
@JM_neutral @AnonVendy @deejayedee@DianaMiller5 Also, birth control fails.
Lets invest in affordable contraception and accredited access to comprehensive sex education that has otherwise been denied to all levels of the public system.
@JM_neutral @LcVanderBoobsen @deejayedee@DianaMiller5 Who on Earth is prop-abortion? Anti-forced birth is not pro-abortion. Governments have refused to invest in actual pro-life policies and have instead invested in this Us vs Them
@LXedos @LiorYakira42 @deejayedee@DianaMiller5 Care about religious freedom as long as its Judeo-Christian freedom. (GOP)
Democracy in the form of Gerrymandered districts (Florida).
Freedom as long as its the freedom to pump out babies you dont want.
Not exclusive to GOP but certainly not lies...