AKSHAY VERMA🏹

[Abhijeet Dipke @abhijeet_dipke]

Ashu was picked up by Assam Police from a private residence. They have still not been told under what charges or on what grounds he has been detained.

If Ashu is not released, I will go to Assam along with other CJP members. Himanta can arrest us all.

[AKSHAY VERMA🏹 @AKSHAYVERMA2]

@_amitbehere Aapka Happy Birthday tha

कब था भई

[Saurav Das @SauravDassss]

🤯

[Arvind Gunasekar @arvindgunasekar]

What ? The ECI’s press note released today has confirmed each element of the @IndianExpress report.

[Mohammed Zubair @zoo_bear]

You still haven’t explained how the BJP obtained the raw video without The Pamphlet’s logo.
When the Congress or other political organisations share videos produced by news outlets such as The Indian Express, the original branding usually remains. So how did the BJP get an unbranded version of The Pamphlet’s footage?
Is @nirwamehta’s outlet @Pamphlet_in receiving preferential access or favours because its director, @alok__bhatt, is associated with the BJP IT cell?
Imagine the BJP overlooking content from your best friend @UnSubtleDesi’s propaganda outlet, OpIndia, and choosing The Pamphlet instead. 🤣
The Pamphlet should disclose whether this video was commissioned, supplied or funded by the BJP.

[Mohammed Zubair @zoo_bear]

Let me tell you a joke!
Here National Secretary of BJP @blsanthosh forgot to highlight that Delhi CM @gupta_rekha's name was also mentioned in the SIR Notice with the same reason - 'Parents age difference less than 15 yrs'. Soon after we highlighted this, EC immediately put out a tweet saying, the issue was taken care of.
What about 1.6 Lakh other voters who received Notices with the same reason?
Also, Didn't you @blsanthosh receive a notice this time saying you were Unmapped in last SIR? Didn't you vote in 2024 & 2025?

[Abhijeet Dipke @abhijeet_dipke]

Thank you, @AUThackeray for extending your support to our call to save democracy.

All Indians, irrespective of their political parties or ideologies, must come together against S.I.R.

[IndiaToday @IndiaToday]

CPM approaches CJP over CEC Gyanesh Kumar row.
▶️CJP yet to take decision on CPM's proposal.

#CPM #CJP #ITVideo #GyaneshKumar | @tweets_amit @Sriya_kundu

[Mohammed Zubair @zoo_bear]

Why FIR against the employee?
The image of minor victim was shared from CM's personal Facebook and personal X account. Not from official Bihar CMO account @officecmbihar.

[AKSHAY VERMA🏹 @AKSHAYVERMA2]

@sky_phd आप बहुत सुलझे हुए लगते हैं
बहुत सुलझे हुआ लिखते हैं
Many Congratulations 👍🏻💐

[Ashutosh Ranka @AshutoshRanka]

बंगाल के अवैध घुसपैठियों में 90% वापस मतदाता सूची में कैसे आ गए? 🤔

[Ashutosh Ranka @AshutoshRanka]

Did your sources tell you if the IE report was wrong?

[Saurabh Bharadwaj @Saurabh_MLAgk]

डर का माहौल है

[Rakesh Chandra @Rakeshchandrahk]

@GodrejAppliance Aapke log AMC karte hai aur service nahi dete. Customer care sunta nahi hai AMC wale phone nahi uthate. Godrej ka product lene se pahle customer soch le. Service zero hai.pareshani ke alawa aur koi nahi .do baar X per bola solve ho jayega issue abhi tak nahi hua.

[Abhijeet Dipke @abhijeet_dipke]

If Gyanesh Kumar does not resign by tomorrow, CJP will begin its nationwide protest from Mumbai on 2 October, and take it to cities across India.

This Gandhi Jayanti let’s pledge to save democracy.

[Amit Behere @_amitbehere]

Itihaas ka sabse bada Jaichand to Modi nikla.

Jitna nuksaan Hindus ka Mughal and Brits nahi kiye 600 saal mein,

yeh bande nay 12 saal mein kar dikhaya.

[AKSHAY VERMA🏹 @AKSHAYVERMA2]

@_amitbehere Hello Amit
This is most reasonably valid quote from you in the morning 👍🏻

[Ashutosh Ranka @AshutoshRanka]

“Your paw-paw has BA in Entire Political History.”

[Saurav Das @SauravDassss]

@UnSubtleDesi all fart. 💨

[Saurav Das @SauravDassss]

🚨IMPORTANT NEWS🚨

Since Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar is in the news, I have some very important but sad news to share about a Supreme Court judge.

Supreme Court judge Justice Satish Chandra Sharma. Just two months away from retirement.

If you remember, the Allahabad High Court had imposed a penalty on Medha Roopam, the DM of Noida and daughter of Gyanesh Kumar with a fine of five lakh rupees for irrationally issuing NSA order against a student Activist for Noida labour protest.

That order was challenged before the Supreme Court of India. Live Law, the news portal, reported that Gyanesh’s daughter’s case was listed before Justice Satish Chandra Sharma out of turn and in violation of the Supreme Court roster and rules and convention. The challenge ought to have gone before Justice Nagarathna’s bench, known to be an independent upright judge.

Two days back, when the matter was listed for hearing, Justice Sharma‘s bench switched off the audio of the Supreme Court proceeding, which is highly unusual and almost never done. ALARMING. There was no explanation from the judge’s side as to why this extraordinary favour was done for Gyanesh’s daughter.

In any case the fine and the adverse remarks of the Allahabad High Court were stayed by Justice Sharma immediately.

Same day, in another case related to Gyanesh Kumar—the constitutional challenge that was filed against the 2023 law on election commissioners of India was finally decided by a two judge bench of which Justice Sharma was a part of.

Under challenge was the appointments procedure where the leader of opposition today holds only an ornamental seat in the Three-member selection committee that selects Election commissioner of India. The other two are PM and his Cabinet Minister. Justice Sharma dissented which led to a split verdict and the case has now been sent before the Chief Justice of India for constituting a larger bench. This has delayed the case by years probably. This split verdict itself came after three years. This is how the Supreme Court refuses to hear most important cases that affect our lives and the country.

A separate blanket immunity granted to past and present election commissioners of India by Modi’s government is also pending for last 9 months before CJI Surya Kant. Today, the Chief Election Commissioner has been exposed for gross illegalities and for stealing votes and elections at the behest of powers that be. Any sane, sorted, neutral, just person can see that the selection process of ECIs is not independent and tilted in govt’s favour. But not Justice Sharma.

And here’s the big news: his son holds not one, not two, but four big, plum government counsel panels, including income, tax department, GST, customs, and excise, and a Madhya Pradesh government lawyer panel. I need not explain the great perks and influence that come along when you hold such plum government panels. Read my Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma report where I exposed the same thing.

I am withholding the name of the son for now.

The important question is: how can a judge be expected to do impartial and fair Justice in politically sensitive cases if his family members serve at the pleasure of the government? The judge is also retiring two months later, and several lawyers have informed me that there are vacancies in NCLAT and other search plum tribunals.

I’M SORRY TO SAY such a system of judiciary does not inspire confidence in its ability to do impartial justice. There is a reason why the ethics code for judges require them to maintain a sense of aloofness and not do anything which can harm the their image and that of the judiciary.

Both in Justice Swarna Kanta’s case and several other judges case, including that of the Supreme Court, it is TRAGIC to notice the complete capture of the institution of the Indian judiciary. Can the judiciary go on like this?