@AreOhEssEyeEe Quite the coincidence that you should post this. Just released in April, Yarmouth's new by-law. Sad sad state Canada has become.
https://t.co/nlH06QcGsN
@Fynnderella1 Pretty sure he wasn't vaxed. In 2021 he missed a week of racing due to the fact that he was in quarantine for a week, which, NASCAR had drivers that were unvaxed, required.
I'm the CRO of @Sync, Canada's end-to-end encrypted cloud storage provider, and Canada's Bill C-22 stands to cause immeasurable harm to the rights of Canadian citizens, and an industry that Canada should be leading in the technology sector.
This bill will cause an exodus of companies, investment, and talent and will not make Canadians any safer. This is a mass government surveillance bill that aims to make privacy companies and people agents of the state. Canada already has methods to collect data, through legal means and using warrants.
This goes against everything @Sync stands for and we will continue to fight against this bill and we are preparing additional measures should this misguided bill come to pass.
@mgeist@JCCFCanada@MelissaLMRogers@Tablesalt13
Also, itโs not enough for people to like and repost this (although visibility helps). Canadians should reach out to MPs and make opposition known directly not just through companies like @Sync and @windscribecom
@MarkJCarney Right, so we knew that after the backlash, you'd eventually post something about Victoria Day - 5.5 HOURS later. ๐
Your Victoria Day message is your cleanup on Aisle 5. No one is buying it - Victoria Day was a deliberate "afterthought."
You're as transparent as a window. ๐
@grok@canmericanized@CTVNews Then why do legacy media have headlines like this, "Canadians, in crucial moment, must decide on equality for all: LGBTQ advocate"?
Piece of delusional stool now wines about personal information. Same piece of stool who handed over personal information between 2021/22. Go Sodomize Yourself Jason.
I understand that my personal information, including my home address, was shared publicly on a screen at a recent Alberta separatist event. It was also recorded on video, and is now circulating.
This was apparently part of the outrageous data leak of Albertansโ private information, wherein Elections Alberta shared its entire detailed provincial voter database with the โRepublican Party of Alberta,โ which in turn shared it with some separatist group called the โCenturion Project,โ whose leadership then shared my personal information publicly.
Over the past few years I have received no shortage of threats from people broadly associated with the separatist / antivax / far right movement in Alberta. So it is disturbing that my personal information is now broadly available, particularly in those circles.
While I have been targeted specifically, the broader data breach may also effect vulnerable Albertans, including victims of domestic violence, journalists, activists, judges, and other public servants for years to come.
I will retain legal counsel to seek advice on recourse regarding this outrageous and potentially dangerous violation of my personal privacy.
Here's where this goes...
Firstly, kiss successful insurance claims goodbye.
Any accident will be blamed on "sub-optimal driver performance", and that time your hands moved briefly from the 10-and-2 or your eyeline wasn't correctly picked up by the mirror sensor will be used to blame your fender-bender on you.
Secondly, there will be a big "people drive dangerously" propaganda push. "ADDW data harvesting has shown up 80% of us might be driving more recklessly than we think", or "most veteran drivers slip in to bad habits, reports show".
Then comes the new legislation to act on this totally fabricated problem. What is it? Oh, it's re-certification. Every driver has to be re-certified after X years on the road.
Or maybe your driver monitoring data will be uploaded to a database and scanned for errors. Those errors put points on your license and if you go over a certain number of points, your ability to drive is taken away pending recertification.
You can appeal, and drive while the appeal takes place. But the appeal fee is greater than the recertification fee, and if you lose, you have to pay legal costs, and you're not allowed to drive for double the usual amount of time.
You'll have to pay a "processing" fee for re-certifying, of course, and if you fail, you'll have to wait X amount of months before you can try again.
Headlines will celebrate both the (fictional) decrease in traffic fatalities and that the smaller number of private vehicles on the road has improved the pollution levels in the inner cities.
An opinion piece from an anonymous "former driver" will appear in the Guardian "I lost my drivers license, and it's the best thing that ever happened to me".
It will talk up how much money they're saving on petrol and road tax, and how much fitter they get walking everywhere and how they know their neighbours so well now.
And all sorts of cosy anecdotes about the charming characters and life-affirming tableaux that public transport exposes you to.