Alessandro Forte

[Dominique de Villepin @Villepin]

Il est des gestes modestes qui contiennent une civilisation tout entière. Préparer le thé, le servir, le recevoir : tout cela pourrait sembler infime. C’est pourtant une morale du monde. Aujourd’hui, je veux vous parler du « Livre du Thé », d’Okakura Kakuzō.

Face à un Occident sûr d’incarner à lui seul le progrès, ce livre nous dit qu’il existe des formes de grandeur qui ne passent ni par le bruit, ni par la conquête, mais par la délicatesse. Le thé y est une école de l’instant, où la beauté loge dans la trace, dans l’imperfection, où le « vide » est une place faite à l’autre, à la respiration, à l’invisible.

Lire ce livre aujourd’hui, c’est retrouver une boussole très contemporaine.

Première leçon : l’attention est une souveraineté. Dans un monde de flux et de notifications, tenir une tasse de thé en pleine conscience devient un acte de résistance.

Deuxième leçon : la douceur est une force. La civilisation se mesure à sa capacité de préserver des formes de délicatesse.

Troisième leçon : l’imperfection est humaine. Le « Livre du thé » valorise la patine, la fissure, l’objet imparfait, parce que l’imperfection dit le vivant.

Quatrième leçon : la rencontre des cultures exige l’humilité, parce que la vraie modernité sait accueillir plusieurs manières de vivre.

Au fond, le thé n’est pas le sujet : le sujet, c’est la dignité de l’instant, et la possibilité, au milieu du bruit, de redevenir présent.

[Alessandro Leonardi @AleEquilibrium]

Questo video è bellissimo e altamente istruttivo. Da proiettare su tutti i media continentali e nelle sedi dell'Unione Europea. In sintesi: il segretario della NATO, Mark Rutte, si presenta in mondovisione come una sorta di "lobbista" dell'apparato militare-industriale USA,

1/4

[Alessandro Leonardi @AleEquilibrium]

Gli indicatori economici, soprattutto se presi singolarmente, sono sempre più limitati e fuorvianti nell'analisi del profondo malessere delle società avanzate. Il caso più eclatante in tal senso sono gli Stati Uniti d'America. Da decenni i nostri leader vendono la favoletta

1/8

[Giulio Centemero @GiulioCentemero]

L’Italia deve parlare il linguaggio dell’innovazione globale.

Il chiarimento su SAFE e incentivi fiscali alle startup va in questa direzione: meno incertezza, più capitale, più competitività.

Ne scrivo sul mio Substack 👇

https://t.co/VwVVONbhmd

[Mateus — eu/acc 🇪🇺 @im_Mateus_]

Former Singapore PM Lee Kuan Yew on the fundamental difference between American and Chinese society:**

Why do America and China see the world so differently? Lee Kuan Yew argues it comes down to one thing: history.

"The difference in the core philosophy between the American and the Chinese... it's a reflection of your history."

He traces America's worldview back to its origins:

"You came over in the Mayflower. You were seeking religious freedom so much so that you refused to allow it to be taught in the schools. You believed in the individual as the creator of all things."

That belief in the individual shaped everything that followed:

"You captured the wild west. I mean, on horseback. New town, main street, you be mayor, I'm sheriff, you're saloon keeper. We build a gold rush town or cattle or whatever it is."

And then came extraordinary fortune:

"You have been immensely fortunate and successful. Two world wars left Europe in a shambles and you emerged as the undamaged technological and industrial power."

China's story, Lee explains, looks nothing like this.

"China has a completely different and a checkered history. 4,000 to 5,000 years of ups and downs. Long periods when there was no governments, anarchy, warlords."

He shares a personal moment that brought this reality home to him:

"I once had a Chinese masseur when I was in Beijing working my game shoulder and we were talking and I said during the war, Japanese time, what currency did you use? So Japanese currency if it's in Japanese controlled areas or other currencies in other areas. So I said how many currencies are there? Two, three? Says 14 or 15 depending on which warlord's area you're in."

So how did the Chinese people survive centuries of chaos, when the state itself kept collapsing?

"Why have they survived in spite of anarchy, disaster, floods, famines? Because there was a social network independent of government that sustained them. The immediate family, the extended family, the clan. You owed them an obligation. You cannot turn them away. That's how they survived."

This is the philosophical fork in the road. America placed the individual at the centre. China placed the family.

Lee describes the system Singapore deliberately chose to preserve:

"If we keep those family bonds, those traditional life raft systems not dependent on the state, which places the emphasis on family, extended family, and then the government, and not the individual at the expense of the family and the state, which is the American system."

He acknowledges what the American system produces:

"So you have Bill Gates or John Chambers of Cisco... you look up Forbes or Fortune or whatever and 50 of the best and the brightest and the wealthiest. That's your experience. That's not China's experience."

But the goal in Asia is different:

"Yes, we also now want to try and get our little Bill Gates going, but in the context of keeping our society solid so that we will survive as a people."

He closes with a sharp reminder of why these two civilisations may never fully understand each other:

"You have never been occupied. You have only had one civil war. So you will never understand what it is."

The takeaway is uncomfortable but worth sitting with: a society's values aren't chosen in the abstract. They're forged by what that society had to survive. Individualism is a luxury of stability. Family-first collectivism is the inheritance of centuries of collapse.

[Alina Ai @Alina_with_Ai]

BREAKING: GOODBYE POWERPOINT. 🚨

Claude can now create a full presentation in just 120 seconds.

No slides. No stress. No design skills.

Just prompts.

Use these 12 prompts and watch the magic happen:

[Prime AI @primemans]

THIS IS INSANE 🔥

Most people spend YEARS on language apps and still can’t speak.

Claude did in 4 weeks what Duolingo couldn’t fix in 4 years.

Here are the prompts 👇🏽👇🏽

[Gandalv @Microinteracti1]

The Man Who Gave Away Patagonia
Doug Tompkins sold his stake in The North Face for $50,000. 

He used the money to co-found Esprit. Then he sold that too, and did something almost no one does with a fortune: he disappeared.

He moved to the tip of South America in 1990 with a theory most businessmen would find absurd.

He believed the best thing a rich man could do was buy wilderness before someone else destroyed it, then hand it back to the country it belonged to.

Together with his wife Kris, a former CEO of Patagonia clothing, they bought and conserved more than 2 million acres across Chile and Argentina. For context: that is roughly the size of Connecticut and Rhode Island combined. Most of it had been degraded farmland. Overgrazed, stripped, exhausted.

The Valle Chacabuco ranch alone had been one of South America’s largest sheep operations. They bought it in 2004 for $10 million, then spent another $55 million over 20 years restoring the grasslands. 

Pumas returned. Guanacos returned. The land remembered what it was.

The Chileans were not immediately grateful. Many locals saw it as a land grab. An American buying millions of acres and telling them to change their way of life. Some accused him of planning to split the country in two. Others claimed he was building a nuclear waste site. He kept buying land anyway.

The deal his wife finalized in his name after his death became the largest-ever private land donation to a country.

Over 1 million acres handed directly to Chile, triggering government protections on another 9 million. Five new national parks. Three expanded. A conservation corridor stretching 1,250 miles.

He died on December 8, 2015, in a kayaking accident on a Patagonian lake, surrounded by friends including Yvon Chouinard. He had called what he was doing “paying rent for his time on the planet.”

There is a certain kind of person who builds something great and then builds something greater by walking away from it.

Tompkins is the rarest version: he walked away from two fortunes, bought a wilderness, and gave it to strangers.

The land is still there. The sheep are gone.

If this kind of story is what you read on weekends, you might belong here.

Gandalv / @Microinteracti1

[Jim Ferguson @JimFergusonUK]

🚨ONE MOVE FROM TURKEY — AND THIS BECOMES A GLOBAL WAR

Erdoğan’s rhetoric is escalating fast— but behind the scenes, Turkey is still holding back.
For now.
Let’s be clear:

Turkey is NATO. Turkey is strategic. Turkey is pivotal.

If it enters this war—
Everything changes.
This stops being regional.

It becomes a multi-front conflict stretching from the Middle East to Europe’s doorstep.
Energy routes collapse. Alliances are tested. Escalation becomes uncontrollable.
Right now—

Turkey is balancing. Watching. Waiting.
But the danger isn’t what’s happening—
It’s how close everything is to tipping.

Because it won’t take much.
One strike. One mistake. One miscalculation.
And the line is crossed.

The question is no longer if tensions rise—

It’s who gets pulled in next.

[Eric 𝕏 @WorldStrategist]

Singapore’s Foreign Minister on why he cannot accept negotiating with Iran for safe passage of ships. Definitely worth listening to:

[Cypher @CypherSacha]

Et si Trump avait tout préparé depuis le début de son mandat ?

Pas une 3ème guerre mondiale. Pas le Grand Israël. Pas le chaos.

Un retrait stratégique déguisé en guerre. Méthodique. Documenté. Et que personne ne voit venir. (x/12)

1/Commençons par ce que tout le monde rate.

Depuis le 28 février, on débat : escalade ou désescalade ? Trump fou ou génie ? Netanyahu qui tire les ficelles ?

Mauvaises questions. Toutes.

La bonne question : qu'est-ce que Trump gagne dans tous les scénarios ?

La réponse est toujours la même. Il sort du Moyen-Orient. Proprement. En déclarant victoire.

2/Le double thinking : son arme principale

Trump annonce des négociations "très productives" avec l'Iran. L'Iran dément dans la minute. Le pétrole chute quand même. Trump obtient une pause de 5 jours sans rien céder.

Ce n'est pas de la confusion. C'est de la coercition calculée.

Il parle aux marchés, aux alliés du Golfe, à l'opinion publique américaine et à Xi simultanément. Avec des messages différents pour chacun. Le tout en 280 caractères.

3/La séquence que personne ne relie entre eux

🇻🇪 Janvier 2026 — Venezuela capturé en 2 heures. Hémisphère occidental fermé. Monroe Doctrine réactivée officiellement dans la NSS 2025.

🇪🇺 Juin 2025 — OTAN 5% acté à La Haye. Les Européens paient leur défense. Les US se désengagent de la dissuasion conventionnelle européenne.

🇮🇷 Février 2026 — Epic Fury. Iran neutralisé militairement. Clés du Moyen-Orient passées à Israël et au Golfe via les Accords d'Abraham.

Trois théâtres. Trois opérations. Un seul objectif : libérer les ressources américaines pour le Pacifique.

4/La preuve n'est pas dans ses tweets

Elle est dans ses documents officiels.

La Heritage Foundation, le cerveau de l'administration l'a écrit noir sur blanc après le sommet NATO de La Haye :

"Ces augmentations de dépenses aideront les Européens à prendre la responsabilité principale de la défense conventionnelle de l'Europe, libérant les ressources américaines pour l'Indo-Pacifique."

Ce n'est pas une théorie. C'est la doctrine officielle de l'administration.

5/Le 5% NATO : pas ce que vous croyez

Tout le monde croit que Trump veut une Europe forte.
Faux.

Le Peterson Institute l'a documenté : Trump impose une demande qu'aucune démocratie européenne ne peut satisfaire économiquement, pour avoir un prétexte de retrait propre.

Résultat obtenu : l'Europe réarme. Les US se retirent. Et Trump peut dire "vous ne payiez pas, j'avais raison depuis le début."

Il transforme son départ en victoire politique domestique.

6/"Mais Trump est piégé par Netanyahu"

Non.

Tulsi Gabbard, sa propre directrice du renseignement a dit au Congrès : "Les objectifs du président sont différents de ceux du gouvernement israélien."

Trump a dit lui-même au Premier ministre japonais : "J'ai dit à Netanyahu d'arrêter d'attaquer les infrastructures pétrolières."

Un homme piégé ne dit pas ça à ses alliés asiatiques.

Netanyahu veut détruire l'Iran définitivement. Trump veut l'affaiblir suffisamment pour partir. Ce ne sont pas les mêmes objectifs. Les fissures sont publiques et documentées.

7/La Chine : le vrai enjeu sous-jacent

80% du pétrole iranien allait en Chine. 17% des importations chinoises totales venaient d'Iran et du Venezuela combinés.

Trump a coupé les deux en 6 semaines.
Pas pour ruiner la Chine. Pour l'amener à la table.

La NSS 2025 le dit explicitement : l'objectif avec Beijing est "une relation économique mutuellement avantageuse."

La disruption d'Hormuz est le levier de négociation. Xi doit aider à rouvrir le Détroit pour obtenir son sommet avec Trump. C'est la condition posée publiquement.

Coercition énergétique à échelle historique.

8/Et Taiwan dans tout ça ?

Le renseignement US est formel : Xi a ordonné à l'APL d'être prête à envahir d'ici 2027.

Chaque porte-avions en mer d'Arabie est un porte-avions manquant en mer de Chine. Chaque intercepteur THAAD brûlé sur un drone iranien à 20 000$ est un intercepteur manquant face aux missiles hypersoniques chinois.

Trump le sait. C'est pour ça qu'il veut sortir maintenant. Pas dans deux ans.

L'horloge tourne. La sienne ET celle de Xi.

9/Ce que ça veut dire pour Dubai et le Golfe

Les EAU ont absorbé 338 missiles balistiques et 1 740 drones en 24 jours.

Pourquoi les Émirats ne se sont-ils pas retournés contre Washington ?
Parce qu'ils comprennent le deal implicite : supportez la guerre maintenant, et vous héritez de la sécurité régionale ensuite. Sans présence US permanente. L'Iran affaibli pour une génération.

C'est exactement ce que Sheikh Mohammed a voulu depuis les Accords d'Abraham.

10/Ce que ça veut dire pour la suite, concrètement

Court terme (2-4 semaines) : sortie déguisée en victoire. Trump déclare avoir "détruit l'armée iranienne." Hormuz se rouvre. Les frappes diminuent progressivement.

Moyen terme (3-6 mois) : sommet Trump-Xi. Deal économique historique. Pétrole américain contre terres rares chinoises. Taiwan comme monnaie d'échange implicite. Pétrole qui retombe vers 70-80$.

Long terme (12-18 mois) : redéploiement complet dans le Pacifique. L'OTAN gère l'Europe. Le Golfe gère le Moyen-Orient. Les US gèrent le Pacifique.

La carte du monde se redessine. En silence.

11/Pourquoi ni le mainstream ni la "réinformation" ne voient ça

Le mainstream compte les missiles et parle de chaos. Il confond le bruit tactique avec l'absence de stratégie.

La réinformation cherche qui tire les ficelles de qui, Epstein, Rothschild, Grand Israël. Elle substitue une grille émotionnelle à une grille analytique.

Les deux ont tort pour la même raison : ils regardent les effets, pas la direction du mouvement.

12/La conclusion

America First n'a jamais signifié isolationnisme.

Ça signifie : utiliser la force une dernière fois, partout où nécessaire, pour se retirer de tous les théâtres secondaires et concentrer toute la puissance américaine là où l'enjeu est existentiel.

Venezuela. Iran. OTAN. Tout converge vers le même point de fuite :

Le deal du siècle avec Xi. Avant Taiwan. Avant 2027.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

I had dinner once with a top physicist and a top computer scientist and asked what they thought the probability was that we were in a simulation.

They answered simultaneously at 0% and 100% respectively. It was like a double-slit experiment, but with humans.

[Ray Dalio @RayDalio]

Comparing what is now happening with what has happened in analogous historical situations and triangulating my thinking with smart, well-informed leaders and experts has always helped me make better decisions. I have found that most wars are filled with big disagreements about what is likely to happen and big surprises.

However, in the case of this Iran war, it is obvious, and there is near-universal agreement, that it all comes down to who controls the Strait of Hormuz. I hear from those who run governments, geopolitical experts, and people all over the world that if Iran is left with control over who can pass through the Strait of Hormuz, or is even left with the power to negotiate, there are four (4) key implications. I wrote about these consequences in my latest article.

I want to emphasize that I am not political; I am just a practical person who has to bet on what will happen and has studied history to draw lessons that help me do that well, and I am now passing along my principles and thoughts that might help others navigate these tumultuous times.

I remain ready, willing, and able to explore these things with you if you’d like to ask me questions in the comments.

https://t.co/R6ERFYZeV8

[Alessandro Leonardi @AleEquilibrium]

Una grafica diventata virale, che rivela il profondo cambiamento in corso nei giovani e lo "scontro antropologico" in atto. Cosa che le élite non capiscono o fanno finta di ignorare. Una buona fetta dei ruoli apicali in Italia, sia settore pubblico, sia privato, sono

1/9

[Anderson Martin @hey_andersonnn]

After 3 years of using Claude, I can say it’s the technology that has revolutionized my life.

Here are 10 prompts I use daily that have transformed my day-to-day life and could do the same for you:

save this🔖

[Gandalv @Microinteracti1]

Europe is quietly becoming what the United States once promised the world.

More and more people are looking at their best years ahead and choosing a place where everyday life is designed to work. Where the future feels stable enough to plan for. Where safety is not a luxury product. Where you can build a good life without gambling your health, your family, or your dignity on one bad month.

In much of Europe, the “dream” is not about becoming a billionaire. It is about becoming unafraid.

It is the freedom of walking home at night without scanning every shadow. The comfort of knowing that if you get sick, you do not need to calculate whether you can afford to be treated. The relief of having a society that still believes children should carry backpacks, not trauma, and definitely not weapons. The calm of streets built for human beings, not just cars. The ability to take a holiday without feeling like you are committing career suicide. The basic decency of labor protections that assume you are a person first and a resource second.

And then there is the part people underestimate until they live it: the texture of life.

The cities are older and more beautiful than you expect. The distances are smaller. Weekends are real. Food is real. Public spaces are not just decorative, they are functional. Parks are full. Cafes are full. Trains take you somewhere, often across borders, without turning travel into a stress test. You can live in one country, work with another, and visit a third like it is normal because, in many places, it is.

The European dream is also a quiet confidence in the social contract. That if you contribute, the system does not abandon you. That you can raise a family without feeling like you are one accident away from ruin. That “getting ahead” does not require burning out. That a good society is one where normal people can live normal lives and still feel proud of them.

This is why more and more Americans are not just visiting Europe, but staying. Some come for studies and never leave. Some arrive for a job and realise the lifestyle is the real promotion. Some originally planned a one year experiment and then cannot imagine going back to a place where stress is treated as a personality trait and insecurity is marketed as freedom.

Europe is not perfect. It has bureaucracy. It has politics. It has problems that deserve criticism.

But in many European countries, life is still built around a simple idea: society should reduce fear, not monetise it.

That is the new dream. And people can feel it the moment they arrive.

If you could choose one thing to trade for a better life, what would it be: more income, or more security? And what do you think your country would have to change for people to stop leaving, and start staying?

Stay connected,
Follow Gandalv @Microinteracti1

[Colonnello Kurtz @Apocalypsevax]

🧵Washington strumentalizza la crisi iraniana per colpire il mercato dell'energia provocando un aumento incontrollato dei prezzi delle esportazioni.
(segue)

[Alessandro Leonardi @AleEquilibrium]

più pressante in questa epoca digitale, inondata da miliardi di stimoli in assurda crescita grazie agli smartphone (internet, social network, mail, chat, videogiochi, Tv, serie streaming, musica, radio, riviste, mass media e via dicendo). A tutto questo va poi aggiunto il

2/7

[Nav Toor @heynavtoor]

🚨BREAKING: Claude is insane for market research.

I reverse-engineered how top consultants at McKinsey, Goldman Sachs, & JP Morgan use it.

The difference is night and day.

Here are 12 insane Claude Opus 4.6 prompts they don't want you to know (Save for later)

[Dominique de Villepin @Villepin]

Dostoïevski est un écrivain rare parce qu’il sait relier l’intime et le commun. Il déterre ce que nous avons de plus fragile pour en faire une vérité universelle. Dans les Carnets du sous-sol, il nous tend un miroir discret mais implacable : il nous fait descendre dans cette « cave » intérieure où s’accumulent les petites humiliations, les rancœurs, la peur d’être vu tel que l’on est.

Si je partage ce livre aujourd’hui, c’est parce qu’il éclaire une tentation très humaine : rester attaché à sa blessure, parce qu’elle est familière, plutôt que risquer la guérison et s’employer à vivre. Le narrateur veut être reconnu, mais il se défend de tout par l’ironie, la contradiction, le retrait. Il souffre, et il se fait souffrir encore, comme si la douleur était devenue une manière d’exister.

Dostoïevski ne moralise pas. Il regarde. Et il laisse une leçon simple, presque tendre : la vengeance n’apaise pas, elle enferme ; la vérité, elle, libère. La force commence peut-être là, dans l’acceptation de sa fragilité, dans ce pas vers soi et vers l’autre qui coûte, mais qui ouvre et libère.

En 2026, dans un monde où la colère circule vite, c’est une boussole précieuse : ne pas faire de sa blessure une identité, ne pas laisser le ressentiment gouverner sa vie.