AlfaZero

Red Devils

[AlfaZero @AlfaZero79]

@AshleyMcduff115 the judge will give more weight to the true intent.
Real-time Evidence Emails or chat messages from the time of the event are considered highly reliable because they are spontaneous and not fabricated for a legal defense, unlike financial documents that may be drafted later.

[AlfaZero @AlfaZero79]

@AshleyMcduff115 This is a critical principle based on the following criteria:
Intent Outweighs Form Even if a financial trail is perfectly legal on paper (Form), if circumstantial evidence like emails or meeting minutes proves the transaction was intended to circumvent rules (Substance)

[AlfaZero @AlfaZero79]

@CityDoctrine The principles of legal consideration by judges are similar to those in the Enron case.

[AlfaZero @AlfaZero79]

@CityDoctrine Even if City's evidence is true, under legal principles, if circumstantial evidence can demonstrate a plan to evade, the actual evidence will still carry less weight. Try reading this thread that I've summarized.

https://t.co/OKzFF5wyOO

[AlfaZero @AlfaZero79]

WHY MANCHESTER CITY'S "IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE" WAS REJECTED BY THE INDEPENDENT COMMISSION: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE JUDGE'S RULING

After Lord Pannick lost twice to Adam Lewis KC in the High Court, the court ordered the club to disclose information and cooperate.

#MCFC

[AlfaZero @AlfaZero79]

@Ringerfann @MancJohnson @iamkhayb or respond to Manchester City's statements. They are simply letting the process run its course.
They will allow the independent appeals commission to review the evidence and witness testimonies, and then weigh which side to believe.

[AlfaZero @AlfaZero79]

@Ringerfann @MancJohnson @iamkhayb If the Premier League's circumstantial evidence is as complete as expected, the reason we haven't seen it publicly is likely because the Premier League and the independent commission, acting as regulators, have no need to disclose it at this stage.

[AlfaZero @AlfaZero79]

@LatteFirm @jonmufc44 https://t.co/TpOK6nQUFV

[AlfaZero @AlfaZero79]

WHY MANCHESTER CITY'S "IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE" WAS REJECTED BY THE INDEPENDENT COMMISSION: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE JUDGE'S RULING

After Lord Pannick lost twice to Adam Lewis KC in the High Court, the court ordered the club to disclose information and cooperate.

#MCFC

[AlfaZero @AlfaZero79]

@NickFergus271 @Johnny_Takes11 https://t.co/p8vNsWkjTz

[AlfaZero @AlfaZero79]

WHY MANCHESTER CITY'S "IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE" WAS REJECTED BY THE INDEPENDENT COMMISSION: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE JUDGE'S RULING

After Lord Pannick lost twice to Adam Lewis KC in the High Court, the court ordered the club to disclose information and cooperate.

#MCFC

[AlfaZero @AlfaZero79]

@WhitlamJosef @Virtus_Strength https://t.co/TpOK6nQUFV

[AlfaZero @AlfaZero79]

WHY MANCHESTER CITY'S "IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE" WAS REJECTED BY THE INDEPENDENT COMMISSION: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE JUDGE'S RULING

After Lord Pannick lost twice to Adam Lewis KC in the High Court, the court ordered the club to disclose information and cooperate.

#MCFC

[AlfaZero @AlfaZero79]

or respond to Manchester City's statements. They are simply letting the process run its course.
They will allow the independent appeals commission to review the evidence and witness testimonies, and then weigh which side to believe.

[AlfaZero @AlfaZero79]

WHY MANCHESTER CITY'S "IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE" WAS REJECTED BY THE INDEPENDENT COMMISSION: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE JUDGE'S RULING

After Lord Pannick lost twice to Adam Lewis KC in the High Court, the court ordered the club to disclose information and cooperate.

#MCFC

[AlfaZero @AlfaZero79]

If the Premier League's circumstantial evidence is as complete as expected, the reason we haven't seen it publicly is likely because the Premier League and the independent commission, acting as regulators, have no need to disclose it at this stage.