alicia davies

Practitioner of sound healing with Gongs, and musician,artist and writer

[alicia davies @AliMaDee]

This is becoming a comedy - if only it was funny. State-approved news; state-approved food; state-approved social media. Sounds awfully communist, don’t you think?

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

Brilliant … Burnham does communism!

Andy Burnham’s senior economic adviser wants a taxpayer funded National Food Service of 9,500 government backed restaurants,

funding meals which will cost taxpayers another £101 BILLION a year 🤡

[Global Dissident @GlobalDiss]

🚨🇪🇺 REJECT THE DIGITAL ID!

Lawyer Meike Terhorst warns that EU member states can refuse this trap.

"This tracking system is not from the government. It is run by a cartel of globalist BANKS and BIG TECH companies."

Do not comply with mass control!

[Greatest Good Tarot @GreatestGoodTar]

I am looking forward to when @thetimes and @SkyNews do the same level and prolonged “investigation” in to these people as they’ve done with Farage.

Because I’m a member of the public, and I’m interested. Only seems fair from a balanced journalistic perspective too 🤔

[alicia davies @AliMaDee]

@elonmusk Wow. Powerful stuff

[Together @Togetherdec]

"Labour’s social media ban could lose public support if it has to be enforced by digital ID checks, research suggests"

Which it almost certainly would

On top of forcing the BBC down everyone's throat and apparently trying to ban VPNs and even open discussion of elections(!), the @uklabour agenda is a deeply sinister one

#dontidtheinternet

[alicia davies @AliMaDee]

@Starlink What’s the equipment cost on top of that figure?

[alicia davies @AliMaDee]

Tyranny, even. But yes; that will be the end result. Only state media allowed. Hmmmmm. That reminds me of something…

[PeterSweden @PeterSweden7]

The British government wants to force social media to boost the BBC.

Which will effectively downrank independent journalists.

This is called tyrrany.

This is not something a free country does.

[alicia davies @AliMaDee]

I’m no Farage fan, but you would say that, wouldn’t you? Feeling the heat, are we??

[The Labour Party @UKLabour]

Funded by crypto billionaires and convicted criminals. What else does Nigel Farage have to hide?

[alicia davies @AliMaDee]

Call one IMMEDIATELY

[Adam @AdamtrendHQ]

Steve Reed says the British public doesn’t want a general election.

Do you agree, or do you think it’s time to call one?

A) Yes, it’s time for a general election
B) No, not yet
C) Not sure

[David Kurten @davidkurten]

There is no climate emergency.
Carbon dioxide is natural and good for plants.

[PeterSweden @PeterSweden7]

If your country wants to control social media algorithms to force people to watch state approved content, then you don't live in a free country anymore.

[Global Dissident @GlobalDiss]

🚨🇬🇧 ORWELLIAN NIGHTMARE IN BRITAIN!

The government is forcing tech giants to twist algorithms so you ONLY see BBC and establishment media lies.

The UK has gone full TYRANNY to brainwash the public

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

"The whole thing is a fallacy right from the start."

Geologist Ian Plimer dispels the "climate crisis" narrative, arguing that no scientific paper to date has demonstrated human-induced carbon dioxide emissions as a driver of global warming.

He maintains that climate models fail because they assume CO₂ drives temperature rise, which he describes as a religious belief unsupported by evidence.

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

Ex-investment banker Catherine Austin Fitts exposes the long-term "master plan"—orchestrated by financial elites—to establish "total control" over humanity, which she believes will ultimately fail.

"You're looking at a very long-term plan to reduce the population and create a two-class society where you have the oligarchs and then everybody else."

"I think they're going to fail... I don't think it's going to work."

[Resist CBDC 🏁 @Resist_CBDC]

The shortest serving PM in history is also the only one to oppose Agenda 2030, Digital ID and CBDC. Not a coincidence.

[alicia davies @AliMaDee]

A couple of days of scorching weather, and we’re ‘cooking’. Boiling in our own sweat, I guess! Yes, it’s uncomfortable, but we’ve had days like this before.

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

UN Secretary-General António Guterres claims London is "cooking" as a result of the "climate crisis". 😳

"We have just lived through the 11 hottest years ever recorded."

"And today, this city [is] experiencing the hottest day of the year, with higher temperatures to come."

"London isn't just calling, it's cooking."

"Around the world, climate disasters are becoming more frequent, more destructive, and more costly."

"It risks blowing the house down, turning up the heat, disrupting food and water systems, and hitting the vulnerable the hardest."

[alicia davies @AliMaDee]

How many times can suspicious endings happen before people start asking questions?

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

Dr. Luc Montagnier, Nobel Laureate, final interview before being FOUND DEAD 6 days later.

"I am here to expose Fauci's gain-of-function – COVID was the job of a professional...it's NOT natural. Sequences like HIV have been added...in order to make a vaccine."

[alicia davies @AliMaDee]

You really couldn't make it up

[Higgy @higgyboson]

Bus company Stagecoach are operating a fleet of 30 "100% Electric, 0% Emissions" buses in Devon.

They are ALL being charged using electricity generated by a diesel generator.

The signage on the side of EVERY one of these buses is absolute bullshit.

[Pete Sanford @PeteSanford]

THE MILIBAND BROTHERS: CRIME SYNDICATE

THE TIMELINE THAT NOW DEMANDS ANSWERS**

And why today’s asbestos revelation makes Miliband’s silence untenable...

For more than a year, the government has insisted that the UK–China “clean energy partnership” is nothing unusual — just routine cooperation, nothing to see here.

But the timeline tells a very different story, and today’s news about asbestos found IN Chinese‑manufactured wind turbines turns this from a policy debate into a public‑safety and national‑security issue.

Here is the sequence of events that now requires full transparency.

🔹 March 2025 — Ed Miliband signs a Memorandum of Understanding with China

He travels to Beijing and signs a wide‑ranging MoU covering:

- Offshore wind
- Electricity grids
- Battery storage
- Carbon capture
- Hydrogen

These are not minor areas. These are **critical national‑infrastructure sectors**.

🔹 March 2025 – February 2026 — The MoU is kept out of public view**

For almost a year, the agreement is not published, not debated in Parliament, and not disclosed to the public.

No press release.
No ministerial statement.
No scrutiny.

🔹 27 February 2026 — The MoU is quietly released.

No announcement. No explanation.
It simply appears on a government website.

The timing and the silence raise immediate questions.

🔹 Spring 2026 — Miliband repeatedly refuses to release the full details.

Across multiple interviews, he:

- Dodges direct questions
- Repeats scripted lines about “normal cooperation”
- Avoids explaining what China gains
- Avoids explaining what UK infrastructure China may influence
- Refuses to publish the full text or annexes

This is not transparency
This is avoidance

🔹 June 2026 — RUSI warns of deepening UK dependence on Chinese supply chains
A respected defence think tank warns that the UK’s offshore‑wind expansion risks:

- Strategic dependence
- Supply‑chain vulnerability
- Loss of control over critical components

Miliband does not address these warnings directly.

🔹 TODAY —

Asbestos found in Chinese‑manufactured wind turbines
This is the moment everything changes.

Asbestos is banned in the UK.
It is a known carcinogen
Its presence in imported turbine components is a **major regulatory failure**.

This is no longer a theoretical risk.

This is a **real‑world safety breach** involving the very sector Miliband has tied to deeper cooperation with China.

THE QUESTIONS ED MILIBAND MUST NOW ANSWER:

1. Why did you refuse to release the full China MoU for so long?

A year‑long delay followed by a quiet publication is not normal practice for a major international agreement.

2. Does the MoU expand Chinese involvement in UK offshore wind projects?

The public deserves clarity on whether Chinese firms gain access to UK tenders, supply chains, or grid‑related work.

3. Were you aware of asbestos risks in imported turbine components?

If yes, why was the public not informed?
If no, why were safety checks inadequate?

4. What due‑diligence processes exist for foreign‑manufactured renewable‑energy components?

Today’s revelation suggests they are either weak or non‑existent.

5. Will you now publish the full MoU, including annexes, technical notes, and implementation plans?

Partial transparency is not transparency.

6. How will the government ensure that UK infrastructure is not compromised by unsafe or non‑compliant imports?

This is a matter of public health and national security.

7. Why should the public trust your assurances when the supply chain has already failed at the most basic safety level?

The asbestos discovery undermines every claim of “routine cooperation” and “nothing to worry about.”

**WHY THIS MATTERS**

This is not about geopolitics.
This is not about party politics.
This is about:

- Public safety
- Regulatory integrity
- National infrastructure
- Transparency in government

When a minister signs an agreement with a foreign power covering critical infrastructure, the public has the right to know **exactly** what was agreed — especially when components from that same country are now found to contain banned carcinogenic materials.

The refusal to release the MoU is no longer a procedural issue.

It is now a **public‑interest emergency**

Given The Potential Corruption of Two Brothers from the Marxist End of Labour.

Ed handing out Huge Green Energy Contracts.

Brother David sitting on the Board of a company seeking to make money from the same Contracts.

IT IS TIME PARLIAMENT, AND THE POLICE TOOK AN INTEREST IN THE CHINESE DEAL

[dejanira @dejanirasilveir]

Las vacas NO están destruyendo el medio ambiente; los ambientalistas SÍ.
¿Estás de acuerdo?

🔥🔥🔥🔥☄️