1.The Qur’an Was Preserved During Prophet Muhammad’s Lifetime
The Qur’an was not only memorized by Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) but also written down by his companions on various materials: parchment, bones, leaves, and leather. By the time of his passing in 632 CE, hundreds of companions had memorized the entire Qur’an word for word.
2.Caliph Uthman’s Standardization Was About Unity, Not Alteration
After Islam spread to distant regions, dialectal differences caused confusion in recitation. Caliph Uthman ibn Affan (r. 644–656 CE) commissioned a single, authoritative copy of the Qur’an to prevent disputes over pronunciation—not to change its content. He did not create a new version. The Uthmanic codex was carefully compiled from the Qur’an memorized by companions and existing written fragments.
3.The “Burning” of Other Copies Was to Prevent Confusion, Not Erasure
The copies that differed only in dialect or script were collected and standardized. These were not “different Qur’ans” with altered teachings—they contained the same revelations but in varying dialect forms. The act ensured consistency in recitation across the rapidly growing Muslim empire.
4.Historical and Textual Evidence Confirms Accuracy
•Early manuscripts like Sana’a manuscript (Yemen) and Topkapi manuscript (Istanbul) are virtually identical to today’s Qur’an.
•Scholars across the Islamic world agree the text has remained unchanged since Uthman’s compilation.
•The Qur’an itself promises divine protection: “Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur’an and indeed, We will be its guardian” (Qur’an 15:9).
5.Conclusion
The idea that Uthman “burned early Qurans to impose his version” is a misrepresentation. It ignores the meticulous preservation by the Prophet’s companions, the purpose of unifying recitation, and the textual evidence confirming the Qur’an’s integrity. Islam teaches that the Qur’an has been perfectly preserved for over 1,400 years.
1. “31 different Qurans” is a misunderstanding of Qirā’āt
What people call “different Qurans” are actually Qirā’āt (recognized modes of recitation), not different books.
•The Qur’an was revealed in multiple dialectical modes to accommodate different Arab tribes.
•These variations involve:
•Minor pronunciation differences
•Slight wording variations that do not change the core meaning or beliefs
•All accepted Qirā’āt trace back authentically to the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him).
So there are not “31 Qurans.”
There is one Qur’an, preserved through multiple authentic recitations.
⸻
2. The Qur’an has one unified text
Across all recitations:
•The chapters, structure, and message are the same
•No version adds or removes books
•No version changes core theology
For example, the well-known Hafs and Warsh recitations differ slightly in wording, but:
•They do not contradict each other
•They often complement meaning
This is controlled variation, not corruption.
⸻
3. The claim “There is only 1 Bible” is historically inaccurate
In reality, there are:
•Multiple versions/translations (e.g., King James Version, New International Version, English Standard Version)
•Different canons:
•Protestant Bible: 66 books
•Catholic Bible: 73 books
•Orthodox Bibles: even more
•Thousands of manuscript variations acknowledged by Biblical scholars
So the idea of “only one Bible” is not supported by academic evidence.
⸻
4. Key difference in preservation
•The Qur’an:
•Memorized by millions word-for-word
•Standardized early
•Preserved through continuous chains of transmission
•The Bible:
•Written over long periods
•Original manuscripts do not exist
•Variations arose through copying and translation
⸻
Strong conclusion
•There are not 31 different Qurans—only one Qur’an with authentic recitation modes
•The claim confuses recitation diversity with textual corruption
•Meanwhile, the Bible exists in multiple versions, canons, and manuscript traditions.
La street ne t’oubliera jamais mec jusqu’a aujourd’hui on parle encore de tes travaux ! On aurait bien aimé te voir faire des dingueries dans le airbnb à Muzan mais c’est pas grave repose toi boss !