Aurélie N.

Researcher in biomedical natural language processing, tea lover and occasional potter

[Aurélie N. @AlmostAisling]

@mixlamalice Ha ha, j’ai acheté des tickets pour Paris au départ d’une gare zone 5 et je ne peux pas les valider au départ de la gare suivante sur la ligne qui est zone 4...

[Aurélie N. @AlmostAisling]

@kirk_roberts Congratulations!

[Aurélie N. @AlmostAisling]

@squig @leeflang_m "If you try to get adequate permission to use your data, then the project/PhD student contract is over before you can even access the data. "

[Aurélie N. @AlmostAisling]

@gg42554 @UndefBehavior @ReviewAcl Experience from the biomedical domain shows that this effectively reduces the reviewer pool by about 30%. Do we need less reviewers? Do we need this type of reviewer self-selection?

[Aurélie N. @AlmostAisling]

@UndefBehavior Well arguably, it should be part of the PhD training. A first reviewing experience should be a co-review (with credit) with a more experienced colleague who can take the time to discuss both the paper and the reviewing process.

[KEEPHAResearch @keepha_research]

Tweets are great material for #NLProc #research; however it is essential to engage tweet authors and seek consent for use in studies as explained by Dr. @cfiesler
https://t.co/Uopl9bVzV9

[Aurélie N. @AlmostAisling]

@keepha_research Great! I hope we get started with the project soon.

[Aurélie N. @AlmostAisling]

Who wants to reply to this tweet?

[Aurélie N. @AlmostAisling]

@keepha_research congrats on your new account, I'm so glad you joined twitter today! 😀

[Aurélie N. @AlmostAisling]

I also loved the idea that any research talk in NLP should be prefaced by a few words in the speakers’ native language - or language of choice. Thanks @cigilt !

[Aurélie N. @AlmostAisling]

That was a wonderful keynote on so many levels: great work on language resource development and NLP for low resource languages but also insightful analysis and comments on ethics and policy.

[Dr. Teresa Lynn @cigilt]

Enjoying a great welcome at #TALN2022 in Avignon as a keynote speaker. Especially great to meet so many French NLP researchers working on low-resourced languages 🙌🏻 #nlproc

[Aurélie N. @AlmostAisling]

@Gwen_psd @gblanc05 Le linguiste Christophe Benzitoun explique que la langue évoluant, il y a mécaniquement une plus grande distance entre français oral et écrit aujourd'hui qu'hier. Apprendre l'orthographe est donc plus difficile pour les enfants d'aujourd'hui https://t.co/WLDeJAQEUz

[Livia Puljak @liviapuljak]

Our new study shows that data availability statements are not very useful; 1670 (93%) authors who indicated that data are available on request either did not respond or declined to share their data with us. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology: https://t.co/4IT2Dgphl4

[Leshem (Legend) Choshen 🤖🤗 @ACL @ICML @LChoshen]

What is it with organizers and presenters not coming to their workshops and their regular/invited talks, i've Never seen anything like that.
Do people not want to discuss their work or is it not worth enough for the handful in the audience?

[Oskar van der Wal @oskarvanderwal]

I am happy to announce that our position paper "You Reap What You Sow: On the Challenges of Bias Evaluation Under Multi-Lingual Settings" has been accepted for presentation at the @BigscienceW #acl2022 ☘️ workshop! 🧵⬇️ https://t.co/3lWsNTuzVC

[Aurélie N. @AlmostAisling]

Dataset available at https://t.co/lrsauyXK1S

[Aurélie N. @AlmostAisling]

Girls just wanna have fun 😎#acl2022 #bestpinkposter

[Aurélie N. @AlmostAisling]

@KarnFort1 Félicitations! 🎈

[Wendy Chapman @wendywchapman]

@MeganPrictor The Practice Fusion case shines a spotlight on the potential for clinical decision support systems to be vehicles for fraud, leading to widespread harm. The tools for uncovering such fraud and harm in Australia are less robust than in the US https://t.co/G3CGKX5vk6

[Aurélie N. @AlmostAisling]

Editors: please let reviewers know this is not acceptable peer review content!

[Aurélie N. @AlmostAisling]

Reviewers: please provide actual constructive advice on how to improve the manuscript. Do not speculate on authors' seniority or qualification and the alleged merit of your criticism.