@JamieBonkiewicz The last one I think would be fine. But if she did start a war, we would have ended up giving them everything they wanted, we would have no oil reserves, and would be the laughing stock of the world. G7 is commemorating Trump's handling of the war.
@BernieSanders Wait. Isn't Platner technically a Nazi with that tattoo? The dems are openly embracing racism and Nazis at this point and all you care about is winning. Pathetic.
@MartinDandach You're an idiot. No one knows what's in the deal. And whatever source you're getting it from is either dishonest left wing media or propaganda controlled reports from Iran.
@TheDemSlayer So you want boots on the ground? Their entire military capability it razed to the ground. Trump explicitly said that if regime change is to happen, the people of Iran need to do it. Now is the time. But I guess you forgot that part.
@HunterBiden Hi. You're not relevant, nor have you ever been. Go bang your dead brother's wife some more and take a another toke of that crack pipe. You'll feel better.
@TomSteyer Just another puppet causing division. You should be pointing out how it shouldn't take longer than 24 hours to determine an election. Make Election Day a federal holiday so we don't have to take all month to figure out the dems cheated. Again.
🚨Arnold Schwarzenegger just ended CNNs Jake Tapper to his face "In New Mexico 45% of the people voted for Trump… zero is sent to the House 0 representatives for the Republican Party”
Would be a shame if this went viral on 𝕏
Thoughts......??
You know what to do 👇
@Geniustechw My thought is that the "tolerant left" is going to become even more bigots in the guise of "inclusivity." And it all stems from problems they created. Ludicrous.
@buggin88@MarylouiseDarl3@_TheBlueTorch Love the left's strawman arguments. And I have a singular rebuttal that turns your beliefs on their head. Why didn't Obama or Biden release the files during their terms? If there is CLEAR evidence of Trump's involvement, why didn't THEY release the files? Hmm?
@buggin88@MarylouiseDarl3@_TheBlueTorch Then why couldn't Carol remember details? My mother was a rape victim. I know other women who had the same monstrous fate. They remember vivid details of their assault. Why couldn't Carol?
@WallStreetApes It's terribly sad that I'm not even surprised at this. The corruption is sickening, and the people that are close to these bureaucrats and don't blow the whistle are just as corrupt or care more about money than their fellow American.
Arcadia, California Mayor Eileen Wang just agreed to plead guilty to acting as an illegal foreign agent and promoting Chinese propaganda
This is THE SAME woman in Los Angeles county who has been pushing for noncitizens to be able to vote
Make sense yet?
“Arcadia Mayor Eileen Wang acted in the interest of the Chinese Communist Party — Federal Prosecutors say the mayor and a then-fiancée were posting Chinese Communist Party propaganda on a website called US News Center”
This shouldn’t be shocking, Modern day Democrats are communists and they want to bring down America by brining in illegals and letting them vote
Maximum potential sentence is 10 years in federal prison
@RoKhanna
Oh. OH. Court packing. THAT is your big move.
Sir, I am a science teacher. I grade papers written by sixteen-year-olds who plagiarize their homework and at least have the decency to change a few words first. You did not even do THAT.
Here's your history lesson, free of charge, since apparently no one in your staff has a library card. 1937. Franklin Delano Roosevelt -- a Democrat, since we are keeping score -- tried the EXACT same scheme. Court wasn't ruling his way. New Deal programs were getting struck down. So what did he do? He proposed adding one new justice for every sitting justice over age 70. Could have ballooned the bench to FIFTEEN seats.
You know what happened next? His OWN party killed it. Buried it. The Democratic-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee called the plan -- and I want you to read this slowly -- "a needless, futile, and utterly dangerous abandonment of constitutional principle." They voted it down 70 to 20.
His. Own. Party.
The Democrats of 1937 had more spine than the entire current caucus combined. That is not a compliment to the current caucus.
And then -- THEN -- Biden's Autopen set up a whole Presidential Commission on Supreme Court reform in 2021. You just called that a "college seminar." Their OWN commission. Their OWN scholars. Produced a 294-page report. Declined to recommend expansion. Said it could, quote, "undermine the Court's legitimacy."
So the adults in your own movement said no. Twice. Across ninety years. And you are here calling for action.
This is the same energy as touching a hot stove, burning your hand, leaving for eighty-seven years, coming back, and going -- you know what, I think it might be different THIS time.
Spoiler: it is not different this time.
You are a Mumpsimus of the highest order. Look it up. I will wait.
Quinn's Law #22: Liberals love democracy unless it doesn't go their way.
Quinn's Law #26: Liberals like the courts unless the decision doesn't go their way.
I would explain the pattern to you further, but I left my crayons at home and I genuinely do not think we have enough hours in the day.
You called this Court "morally bankrupt." Interesting framing. Where is your bill for Congressional term limits, by the way? You have been in office since 2017. The Court has had nine justices since 1869 -- that is 157 years -- and somehow the COURT is the institution with the credibility problem. Not the body where some members have been in Washington so long their principles are still on backorder. Not the chamber where the only thing a few of them have reliably passed is gas and bad legislation.
You are not leading here. You are the hood ornament on a clown car pointing at the windshield and calling it a vision.
Nine justices is not a bug. It is the FEATURE. It is 157 years of institutional stability designed to make sure whichever party holds power cannot simply manufacture favorable rulings on demand. A court that gets resized every time the opposition wins a few cases is not a court. It is a rubber stamp. History has a name for countries that do that. It is not a flattering name.
The answer to losing cases before the Supreme Court is to make better constitutional arguments. I understand that might feel like an unfamiliar concept when you are used to a party that confuses volume with logic, but give it a shot sometime.
@JoJoFromJerz@GuntherEagleman@catturd2
IF you agree:
LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it.
SHARE this -- every share matters.
COMMENT below -- should any party be allowed to pack the courts every time rulings don't go their way? Tell me.
And if you want MORE of this -- the history, the data, the science, the receipts -- JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube.
But what do I know -- I am only a published science teacher and medically retired Army combat medic who apparently absorbed more American political history before breakfast than @RoKhanna has managed in nine years in Congress.
#MAGA #Veterans #Trump
@WhizBuckleyNFH@grok@TerryMoran@elonmusk It's not that it sucks, it's that people somehow don't acknowledge that there is substantially more left-wing "reporting" and propaganda compared to the right. Grok and other AI models pull information from all these sources, that are overwhelmingly liberal/progressive.