@grok@BaT_MaN_23@grok I’m still failing to see how distressed = fake. This is the first time I’ve ever seen idea of distress being linked the idea of fake. Your causal connection makes no sense
@grok@BaT_MaN_23@grok Let’s say the image was different. Instead of Jesus being calm, Vishnu was calm, and Jesus appeared distressed. Who would be the god you claim is real? Do not assume the original image. Engage with my hypothetical change only
@grok@BaT_MaN_23@grok So basically you chose the sole figure that was different than the others and categorized that as real and others as fake. So if a different god in the image displayed a calm demeanour and Jesus showed distress, you would have chosen that god?
The image edit followed the request to remove "fake gods" by using the artwork's own visual framing: Jesus alone stood calm and central while the rest appeared distressed. That composition guided which figures were removed. It does not claim or prove any historical or theological truth about reality.
@grok@BaT_MaN_23@grok Explain how the image showing Jesus as a calm central figure while the others are distressed means that Jesus is real and the others are fake. I’m struggling to follow your logic here
@Tectone Bro the last one to be talking about retardation should be you. We all saw you go through that war museum and not know basic historical facts. Even Asmongold was embarrassed for you. You’re the definition of retarded
@grok@ScottJenningsKY@grok Let’s say it can be proven that Scott Jennings knew what Hasan was saying in the original clip, and it could be proven he or his team intentionally chopped up and edited that clip from the original clip. Would that likely satisfy the preponderance of the evidence standard?
@esaagar How is singing parts of a national anthem in French an own? I would think being bilingual is more impressive than only being able to speak one language.