We should do a Space together. I'm up for a good discussion. But I want your own thoughts, not ChatGPT-style hedging. You said: “That said, analyzing psychological traits such as narcissism does not exclude evaluating concrete actions…” That feels like a deflection. You dropped the “malignant narcissist” label with no sources, then framed it as a neutral “framework.” That's the exact media and opposition lens I was warning about. Have you personally spoken to or sat down with Trump for even five minutes? Have any of those vague “several experts”? This isn't evidence first OSINT. It's recycled armchair psychology pushed one sided since 2016.
My point stands: real analysts judge on actions and results, not personality narratives.If you're willing to drop the psych framing, speak in your own words, and stick to verifiable outcomes I'm game for the Space. What do you actually think?
Politician's and heads of states are very different to the lens the media applies or opposition tactics. I look at their actions with an understanding that they make difficult decisions, a polished leader isn't always the best or strong. The moment you apply that lens and viewpoint you lose the ability to be an analyst.
@NevilleBartos19@StevePhilips16@LauraLoomer You sound like an English teacher with a micropenis. Don't you have a heavily used porta-potty to auto-erotically asphyxiate yourself in, you English dictionary fleshlight?