Danger, Will Robinson!

"sic semper tyrannis" recovering litigator, canine concierge, furniture fabricator, chicken farmer *inspired by Fannie Lou Hamer* (he/him).

[Danger, Will Robinson! @AmicusLegis]

@DemPatriotLA @MrShermichael boy howdy has president no windmills made an ironclad case for green renewable energy. we're seeing in real time the realization of the risk to national and economic safety that being buggered perpetually and exclusively by the fossil fuel lobby creates.

[Danger, Will Robinson! @AmicusLegis]

@MrShermichael wild that you'd trust this administration to not cause closures, especially with weeks and weeks of turning the war on and off like a light switch.

[John Bourscheid 🇺🇸 🚀 @bourscheid]

🚨BREAKING: In case you missed it, yesterday in a Fox News interview Benjamin Netanyahu let it slip that the Israeli military was planning to merge with the Pentagon.

The US will be the single source of IDF funding, which explains the insane budget proposal for next year.

[Hana Katana ⚔️😷🏴🏳️‍🌈 🍉 THEY/THEM @KatanaSpeaks]

Leftists have donated over $1.5 million to a rapist while there are rape victims currently starving, unhoused & in need of medical care who ask for help everyday but are ignored by people with the means to help.

Rape culture is fascism, upholding rape culture isn't anti-fascist.

[JJ in NH @JustJoshinNH]

“Don’t speak ill of them they’re not around to defend themselves anymore” well they had a lifetime to do so and it’s dickwads like you running interference for them now, so

[Danger, Will Robinson! @AmicusLegis]

@ConceptualJames such pompous arrogance for a wee hypocritical cuck. objectively, lol.

[God @TheTweetOfGod]

Anybody who thinks I don't want you to be glad when certain people are dead is utterly unfamiliar with My work.

[Danger, Will Robinson! @AmicusLegis]

desperately irrelevant dipshit says what?

[Piers Morgan @piersmorgan]

Seeing the despicably cruel, heartless and abusive way that many people in UK and US have responded to the deaths of conservative politicians, Ann Widdecombe and Lindsey Graham, reminds me that the least kind people on earth are ironically those on the #BeKind woke left.

[Chris D. Jackson @ChrisDJackson]

Isn't it funny how the mainstream media suddenly loses interest when the truth destroys one of its favorite anti-Biden narratives.

Yes, you read that right: @HunterBiden won a defamation case over bullshit claims that he was corrupt.

And remember the FBI informant who claimed Joe and Hunter Biden took bribes from Burisma? He pleaded guilty to lying. But you probably didn't know that because it only made it to the back page headlines at the time.

The press gave the accusations endless headlines and wall-to-wall coverage. But when the stories collapse, the accusers are exposed, and the Bidens are vindicated?
Crickets.

Because the lie was profitable. The truth was inconvenient.

The lie gets the headline. The Bidens get smeared. The truth gets buried.

[God @TheTweetOfGod]

"If I support Trump, I will go to hell, and I will deserve it.

Yep, I was right."

--Lindsey Graham, July 12, 2026.

[Danger, Will Robinson! @AmicusLegis]

@Logically_JC @bdk1521 this weird obsession with death somehow cleansing someone of the shitty person they were before dying is more fear of death than anything, and needs to go.

also, pratt's whining here is deeply hypocritical, in context.

[Danger, Will Robinson! @AmicusLegis]

@RepTenney maybe we should start acting like an ally again.

[Sizwe SikaMusi @SizweLo]

People defend capitalism because they confuse it with commerce. They believe “capitalism” is when people start businesses and sell things.

If people understood that the thing they call capitalism and love so much is actually just commerce and that it’s not the same thing as capitalism, they would feel very different.

This is because a local baker selling bread, a mechanic fixing cars, or an artisan selling wares on a digital storefront is a sign of commerce in a market economy, which is simply a mechanism for exchanging goods and services based on supply and demand.

Needless to say, this has existed for thousands of years before capitalism was created.

As economic historian Fernand Braudel pointed out, commerce and capitalism are not only distinct; but historically, they have often operated at cross-purposes.

According to Braudel, ordinary commerce is competitive and transparent, while capitalism is anti-competitive and deliberately opaque, making it a zone of privilege held by a small elite who bend the rules in their favour.

Braudel further argues that commerce, or the market, is horizontal, transparent, and competitive and as old as civilization itself. It involves individuals or small groups trading goods, where barriers to entry are low, no single player dominates, and profit is a reward for fulfilling a specific need.

Capitalism, meanwhile, is a specific institutional arrangement that emerged relatively recently in human history, around the 16th to 17th centuries. It is NOT just people “trading stuff”. It is instead the legal and financial system where the means of production are privately owned, and the primary objective is the continuous, infinite accumulation of capital.

Because of this accumulation-obssessed nature of capitalism, when it scales up, it seeks to eliminate the free play of commerce to protect its investments. True market competition is risky for massive capital as it drives prices down and threatens profit margins.

Braudel contended that capitalism only begins where commerce ends. It is the zone of high finance and state collusion. Because it operates across vast distances such as the 17th-century spice trade, information takes months to travel, which creates a deliberate lack of transparency.

Braudel noted that the great capitalists of the early modern era in Madeira and Venice or the Dutch East India Company, never wanted to compete in a fair, transparent market because competition slices profit margins to the bone. Instead, they secured royal charters, exclusive trading rights, and naval protection. At the same time, the state granted them legal monopolies, effectively outlawing competition.

Therefore, capitalism naturally trends toward creating monopolies and securing state interventions like bailouts, subsidies, and regulatory capture to shield itself from the very market forces it claims to champion. In fact, the most important takeaway from Braudel’s analysis is that capitalism is NOT the natural evolution or the highest form of the free market, it is its dark shadow.

So, when our lizard overlords use “free market” and “capitalism” interchangeably, they’re deliberately hiding this distinction and using the moral legitimacy of the hard-working, transparent business owner to defend the structural privileges of the protected financial elite and its regulatory capture.

If ordinary people could comprehend these distinctions, many self-described “capitalists” would realise they are just pro-commerce, and actually anti-capitalist, because it would be clear that defending “capitalism” means defending the right of a small parasite class to bypass the market entirely.

[Danger, Will Robinson! @AmicusLegis]

@FMcpickle99872 @AllisonRFloyd @bigRD73 oh look, another hyperemotional man in hysterics.

[t boy lois griffin @MolotovCumjar]

Waow (basedbasedbasedbased)

[Danger, Will Robinson! @AmicusLegis]

@Pevenly1 this feels like one of those "training facial recognition software" posts.

[Danger, Will Robinson! @AmicusLegis]

@MoiraDonegan the truth is not always welcome, i suppose. keep it up, though. you're an excellent follow.

[YourFavoriteGuy @guychristensen_]

It’s literally a 20 second video pointing out how american workers are being exploited for 75% of the value they produce for billionaires 😹

[Drey @thedreydossier]

Trump Accounts are no longer going to be optional- so if you ever plan on having a child in the USA, you should read what I found:

According to the @SocialSecurity Administration's announcement last week, they are modifying the hospital birth registration form so that a Trump Account is AUTOMATICALLY created for your child through that same process.

It will be bundled into the Enumeration at Birth program (EAB), which is the already automated gov pipeline that gives your newborn a Social Security number. It’s one box that you check, you don’t have the option of unbundling it. So if you want your kid to have a Social Security number, they have to have a Trump account.

Which is strange, because according to the IRS and @USTreasury’s public announcements, these accounts only open when a parent actively elects to open one. So which is it? Why is nobody in the government interested in explaining this flagrant contradiction?

Who is going to answer the basic question of what a parent does if they don’t want a government-linked investment account (one that collects biometric data, by the way) created for their child at the exact moment their child’s Social Security number issued?

They can call it a savings account all they want, but a $1,000 deposit is a hell of a cheap price for building a lifelong financial file on every American child before they can consent to anything.

And once the government normalizes linking a person’s identity, financial activity, and predictive systems from birth, who gets to decide what that data will be used to predict later?

We deserve answers immediately. @ndstudio @WhiteHouse

[Jonathan Cook @Jonathan_K_Cook]

"They could not stop you from looking at Palestine, so they bought the screen you were looking through."

How the western ruling class and the Zionist lobby spent $14 billion to take back control of our minds: