Arthur Mieggeint

Onvoorwaardelijk vrij zijn, bestaan, leven en onvoorwaardelijk vrij laten zijn, bestaan, leven. Onvoorwaardelijk vrije en vrij latende co-existentie.

[Daily Dutch Masters 🇳🇱 🎨 @Goudriaan2]

A moonlit river landscape
Aert van der Neer, 17th century

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Donald Trump, if you want to be remembered for eternity as a hero of Western civilization, there's one thing left to do: bring down the European Union.

Not Europe. The European Union.

Europe is Athens, Rome, the cathedrals, the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution. The EU is a rule-making machine that suffocates its own nations, regulates what it can no longer build, and confuses governing with forbidding.

Giving Europeans back their sovereignty wouldn't be an attack on the West. It would save it.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Millions and millions and millions of people need to be forcibly removed from our continent.

Save Europe.

[𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗠𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗲𝘀 @Old_But_Gold50s]

Listening to Bach’s Air on the G String feels like letting your mind slowly settle, your worries gently fade, and everything fall into harmony with the music’s peaceful flow.

[Bert Brussen @bertbrussen]

@TheodorHolman 'Genocidaal geweld' is een woord dat is uitgevonden voor en door mensen die er niet mee kunnen leven dat er domweg géén genocide wordt gepleegd in Gaza. Nu kunnen ze alsnog het woordje 'genocide' gebruiken, geheel feitenvrij.

[Laurissa @laurisencurella]

@macbethertje @Hetishelder Ze lopen bij die mensen hun eigen oprit op..
Dat tuig hoort van mense hun spullen af te blijven.

[Helga @Helgas1111]

@Michel1401 @Hetishelder @HSaldima War hebben ze op privéterrein te zoeken

[Art @Art93539166]

Rue Lafayette 1891.
Edvard Munch 1863-1944.
National Gallery of Norway.

[Alexander Duncan @AlexDuncanTX]

Eradicate Islam in its entirety.

[Arthur Mieggeint @AMieggeint]

@yusuyusu43 @DieuwsNieuws @Nathan_vd_Hulst Tegenmenselijke totalitaire terroristische doodscultus islam is HET probleem waarmee in en vanuit ONZE Vrije Westerse Wereld en Beschaving zal worden afgerekend. Read the room.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

EU will be destroyed soon.

This just inevitable.

[Kevin Sorbo @ksorbs]

Poland is the last bastion of European culture that hasn’t been infected by mass migration. Don’t let it fall.

[Kevin Sorbo @ksorbs]

It’s a miracle. You have united the entire right and have ruined your political career with a single post

[CS @deSunShineBand]

De Poolse Europarlementariër Dominik Tarczyński legt uit wat er momenteel gaande is bij het Poolse Constitutioneel Tribunaal; hij noemt het niets minder dan een staatsgreep!

“In Polen hebben we een liberaal-linkse regering onder leiding van premier Donald Tusk. Wat er nu gebeurt met het Constitutioneel Tribunaal is dat zij het willen overnemen en naar hun eigen hand willen zetten door er hun eigen mensen te plaatsen.

Waarom? Omdat ze van de Poolse munteenheid af willen, ons de eurozone in willen dwingen en onze veilige grenzen willen afschaffen. Ze worden daartoe aangezet door de Duitsers, die de lasten van illegale migratie willen spreiden en migranten naar Polen willen sturen.

Ten eerste is de Poolse zloty onze grondwettelijk beschermde munteenheid. Om die te kunnen vervangen, moet de grondwet worden gewijzigd – en zonder het Constitutioneel Tribunaal kunnen ze dat niet doen.

Dus, in de eerste plaats willen ze van onze munteenheid af, ons dwingen de euro in te voeren en toe te treden tot de eurozone. Daarnaast willen ze onze goudreserves – de grootste van de Europese Unie – overbrengen naar Frankfurt, naar de Europese Centrale Bank; een instelling die in Duitsland is gevestigd.

Ook willen ze onze grenzen openstellen. Bovendien willen ze ervoor zorgen dat, wanneer ze de volgende verkiezingen – die volgend jaar plaatsvinden – verliezen, het Constitutioneel Tribunaal niet langer in staat is om in te grijpen, hun acties te stoppen of hun besluiten terug te draaien.

Er zijn nog veel meer redenen, maar één ding moet duidelijk zijn: ze staan ​​onder Duitse invloed. Het zijn globalisten, en wij strijden niet alleen voor Polen, maar voor heel Europa.

Volg het voorbeeld van Polen. Wees sterk. Onze natie is krachtig, en wij gaan deze strijd winnen!”

[Niemands Knegt @NiemandsKnegt]

Gezien de, om het eufemistisch te zeggen, stroperige manier waarop de reguliere media reageerden op de ontwikkelingen in Polen, moeten wij dolblij zijn met de sociale media.

Het traditionele mediamonopolie veroorzaakte grote blinde vlekken blijkt nu… Platforms zoals X spelen een cruciale rol bij het omzeilen van eventuele media-censuur of politieke druk.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Poland is the fatal error from EU.

They won’t recover.

[Izabella Kaminska @izakaminska]

Newbies to the Polish political drama need to understand how language is being misused (by both sides) to further their respective crusades.

To the uninitiated, “restoring the rule of law” probably sounds like a noble objective. The framing makes it sound as though the previous government (despite being called the Law and Justice party) ruled without any regard for law and justice. Perhaps, even, that it abused its power by oppressing dissidents or confiscating assets. Who knows.

Tusk’s accusation of “lawlessness” is even more sensational and misleading. In ordinary language, the term conjures up images of a mafia state, or worse, a failed state where it’s every man for himself.

But no reasonable person assessing the period during which PiS was in power could honestly suggest that this was the case. Poland was not lawless in any ordinary understanding of the word.

The sleight of hand lies in taking a specific legal and constitutional dispute and repackaging it as a sweeping indictment of an entire government. The accusation derives its legitimacy from genuine controversies over the rule of law, but its political force comes from the much broader and more sinister meaning that the phrase carries in everyday language.

At the heart of the dispute is the question of whether Polish constitutional law can take precedence over EU law in areas where the EU maintains that its law has primacy, alongside controversies surrounding judicial independence. These are major legal questions, but they are a far cry from the impression of generalised lawlessness that Tusk’s rhetoric invites.

“Restoring the rule of law” is an exceptionally effective piece of political messaging. It allows Tusk to present his government as the force restoring legality, while casting his opponents as people who governed outside the law.

Yet, powerful states such as the US and China have long asserted their sovereignty against international legal constraints they consider unacceptable. The EU may be a distinct legal order whose treaties Poland voluntarily accepted, but the broader question of where national sovereignty ends and supranational authority begins is hardly unique to Poland.

Of course, the ultimate source of the consternation lies in PiS’ judicial reforms during its time in power. Yes, breaking established procedures to pack supposedly independent courts with your own appointees is not a good look. But it becomes a little more understandable when you consider the historical context that Western media so often leave out when reporting on the story.

Poland never underwent a comprehensive “lustration” of its judiciary after the fall of communism. The transition involved compromises that allowed considerable institutional continuity, with elements of the old judicial establishment, its professional networks and institutional culture surviving into the new democratic order.

This is crucial because PiS did not regard itself as politicising an otherwise independent judiciary. Its contention was precisely the opposite: that the judiciary was already politicised, having never been sufficiently disentangled from the structures and networks inherited from the communist era.

From that perspective, its reforms were intended to dismantle an entrenched establishment rather than create one. The opposition and the EU regarded those same interventions as an assault on judicial independence.

Tusk and his allies have often challenged the relevance of the judiciary’s communist-era legacy by pointing out that most judges from that period are no longer serving. But this misses the substance of the argument. The concern is not necessarily about the survival of individual communist-era judges, but about the professional networks, institutional culture and entrenched structures that may have outlived them. The continuum.

[Koen Godderis @koengodderis]

Je mag nog zoveel staatsgrepen plegen als je wil, maar als je het volk niet mee hebt, kan dit nooit lukken. #Tusk, de globalistische rat heeft zijn hand overspeeld. Deze volksverrader zal daar geheel terecht de gevolgen van dragen. De globalisten zijn radeloos. Hun tijd is op.

[🇵🇱 Stańczyk @NatConPatriot]

🇵🇱 A HUGE message from Poland to the entire world:

MP @paweljablonski_ (@RozwojPlus) has a message for the entire world, which is currently following the dramatic events surrounding a coup d'état in Poland:

"Dear friends, watch our country. We have great tradition, we are faithful to our families, to our values, to our faith, but there are people that want to take it away from us - there is a government, that is planning to illegally take over the Constitutional Court.

We are defending freedom. What is happening in Poland tonight, may soon be happening also in other countries - this left-wing liberal globalists, they want to do it the same in France in Italy, in USA, in the UK in Germany - all across the world, so please, remain with us, stay with us.

We will prevail."

[Jack Posobiec @JackPosobiec]

Understand the stakes

Poland is one of the only EU countries that refused to take Muslim migrants for the last 10 years and rejected the agenda of the globalists to transform their nation

The globalists are now using state force to open the doors of Poland to mass Islamificafion like Paris and London