Brother Yusuf

Islamic Wisdom | Psychology | Human Connection. 30 years of study. Debunking myths and sharing the authentic truth about Islam. Simple, clear, with proof.

[Brother Yusuf @Amiraydam]

"Gotcha"? You just called your own prophet Moses "sick".

Let’s remind everyone what we are quoting here: Numbers 31:17–18 from YOUR Bible, where Moses explicitly commands the army:

"Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man by lying with him. But all the female children that have not known a man... keep alive for yourselves."

Islam didn't write Numbers 31 it is canonized in your Christian Old Testament.

In Islam, the Prophet ﷺ strictly forbade the killing of women, children, monks, and non-combatants in war. Marriage in Islamic jurisprudence unconditionally requires physical maturity, sound judgment (rushd), and consent.

In your Bible, Moses orders the execution of baby boys and hands 32,000 captive young virgin girls over to adult soldiers as plunder.

So if you find that "sick," stop running to Muhammad ﷺ and explain to everyone why you worship a book where Moses gave that exact order. We're waiting.

[Brother Yusuf @Amiraydam]

You just admitted what Christians spend hours trying to deny: you literally believe Jesus "abrogated the old laws".

Now go read the red letters of your own Gospel where Jesus directly contradicts you:

"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.
For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.
Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven..." (Matthew 5:17–19)

Has heaven and earth disappeared? No.

Yet you claim Jesus abrogated the Law, while Jesus explicitly said not a single dot of the pen will disappear until heaven and earth pass away.

Jesus never told his disciples to eat pork, abandon circumcision, or throw away the Sabbath. Jesus kept the Sabbath, was circumcised on the eighth day (Luke 2:21), and commanded people to obey the Law of Moses (Matthew 8:4, Matthew 23:2–3).

It was Paul who called the Law a "curse" (Galatians 3:13) and said circumcision counts for nothing (Galatians 5:2).

Saying "we declare it the inspired Word of God" while simultaneously declaring every single practical command inside it dead and canceled isn't "completion" it is complete nullification disguised as devotion.

[Brother Yusuf @Amiraydam]

You just proved you do not know the biblical and historical tradition of Abraham at all.

You pasted Genesis 18 about Sodom, but you completely missed where Abraham came from and why he was called out in the first place:

Your Own Bible on Abraham's Idol-Worshiping FamilyLook at Joshua 24:2:"Long ago your ancestors, including Terah the father of Abraham and Nahor, lived beyond the Euphrates River and WORSHIPED OTHER GODS."

The Bible itself explicitly confirms that Abraham's father and ancestors were pagan idolaters.
The Jewish Historical Record Confirms Abraham Smashing IdolsYou claimed the Quran "concocted" Abraham confronting idolaters and smashing idols. Did you forget that Jewish tradition recorded this centuries before Islam?

Open Bereshit Rabbah 38:13 in the Midrash: Terah was literally a manufacturer of idols, and Abraham challenged people who worshiped statues made that very day, asking how an adult could bow to an object made minutes ago, before smashing his father's idols with a staff.

The Apocryphal Book of Jubilees 12:1–3 records Abraham begging his father Terah: "What help or profit have we from these idols which you serve and worship? For there is no spirit in them, for they are dumb works and an error of the heart.
Do not worship them."Calling this "concocted" simply exposes that you don't even know Jewish literature or the biblical backstory of Abraham's departure from Ur of the Chaldees.

Intercession in the Quran ...You quoted Genesis 18 as if Abraham having mercy on sinners is absent from Islam. Did you bother reading the Quran?

In Surah Hud (11:74–75), when the angels come to destroy the people of Lot, the Quran literally says:"Abraham argued with Us concerning the people of Lot. Indeed, Abraham was forbearing, grieving, and frequently returning to Allah."

Abraham stood against idol worship and he pleaded for the innocent. Islam affirms both, while your reply only proved you haven't read your own tradition beyond Sunday school.

[Brother Yusuf @Amiraydam]

Saying "it comes from Muslim sources" means nothing when you can’t quote a single original Arabic line to back up the mistranslation you fell for.

You claimed the text meant something perverse, and I exposed the actual Arabic words for everyone reading:

Mass/lahas describes a grandfather kissing his grandson’s tongue/lips affectionately, a traditional Middle Eastern sign of tenderness that polemicists deliberately perverted.
The "thirty men" report explicitly refers to physical strength and labor capacity, not sexual submission.

You couldn't refute a single word of the Greek breakdown (proskuneo vs. latreia), you couldn't defend the Arabic text, and you ran away from your own Bible's verses on Lot (Genesis 19) and Numbers 31.

Every time you are challenged with actual scholarship, your vocabulary shrinks to insults, slurs, and "go kiss a black rock".

If you have actual citations with original text, bring them. Otherwise, thank you for proving to everyone reading this thread who has the evidence and who only has rage.

[Brother Yusuf @Amiraydam]

We don't need a voice space or your biased moderator to have an honest debate. We have text right here on X where everything is written down, visible to the public, and impossible to shout over.

Notice the difference between us: you came with baseless claims, and I answered every single one of your points calmly with direct citations. I didn't insult you once. Your immediate reaction was to throw vulgar, childish insults because you had no textual answers left. That tells everyone everything they need to know.

If you truly want to debate like a mature adult, you can do it right here in this thread:

You ask a question, I answer. I ask a question, you answer. Fair and simple.

Start right now by answering the question you ran away from:

How do you morally defend Numbers 31:17–18 commanding the slaughter of little boys and taking 32,000 young virgin girls as spoils of war, and 1 Samuel 15:3 commanding the slaughter of "infant and nursing babe"?

The floor is yours. No deflecting, no slurs just answer the verses.

[Brother Yusuf @Amiraydam]

"Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man by lying with him. But all the female children that have not known a man... keep alive for yourselves." (Numbers 31:17–18)

You quote Matthew 18:6 claiming Jesus said to hang a millstone around the neck of anyone who harms a child, while worshiping a scripture where the army of God is commanded to execute little boys and keep thousands of virgin girls as spoils of war.

Explain that verse before you sit in judgment of history.

[Kero @kerojitsu]

A 6 year old is a child in ANY time period. Enough is enough. Do better. We should be protecting children. ☦️ #jesus #christianity #christian #muslim #viral

[Brother Yusuf @Amiraydam]

Notice the pattern......every time you bring actual scripture and original language to the table, the other side completely collapses into childish insults.

You couldn't answer the Greek breakdown of proskuneo vs. latreia.

I broke down your fabricated claims piece by piece, exposed where you got them wrong, and cited your own Old Testament verses verbatim:

Lot’s daughters in Genesis 19:30–36

Deuteronomy 22:28–29 forcing victims to marry their rapists

Abraham handing Sarah to pagan kings in Genesis 12 and 20

Numbers 31:17–18 commanding the slaughter of male children and taking 32,000 young virgin girls

Instead of addressing a single one of those biblical texts or defending your claims with evidence, you resorted to vulgar slurs and playground insults.

When someone abandons the argument and dives straight into the gutter, it’s because they have zero answers left. Total intellectual surrender.

[Brother Yusuf @Amiraydam]

First of all, blindly relying on AI to argue about religion is a huge mistake. AI isn’t perfect, and everything I post is what I actually believe, studied, and know inside out.

Just so you know who you’re talking to: I’ve been studying Islam and comparative religion for over 20 years. I hold a doctorate in Islamic studies along with advanced scholarly licenses (Ijazah).
Long before AI existed, I was writing articles, producing educational videos, and debating apologists face-to-face, on stage, and on live TV. My study of the Bible wasn’t just a hobby it was personal and serious, sharpened through deep discussions with my own grandfather, who was a prominent, well-known Christian priest.

Yes, I use AI today,everyone does but I built my own digital system loaded with the classical books, original Hebrew and Greek texts, and verified history that I’ve spent decades studying. I know exactly what to look for and what to check. When you just copy-paste from AI without actually understanding the text yourself, you end up posting arguments that contradict your own position.

Now, back to the points you pasted:

Jeremiah 31 and the LawYour AI brought up Jeremiah 31:31–33 to claim the old Law was meant to end. But did you read verse 33? God says: "I will put my Law in their minds and write it on their hearts." God said He would write the Torah on their hearts not throw away circumcision, start eating pork, and cancel the commandments like Paul did.

Even Jesus said in Matthew 5:19 that anyone who cancels the smallest command and teaches others to do the same will be called the lowest in the Kingdom of Heaven.
The Daniel 7 "Worship" ArgumentYour AI claimed the phrase pelach in Daniel 7:14 proves the Son of Man is God because it means "worship".

Keep reading to Daniel 7:27. That same verse says the kingdom will be given to the holy people of the Most High, and all rulers will serve and obey (pelach) them. By that logic, are the holy people God too? The text literally shows the Son of Man being led up to God to receive authority.
The Almighty doesn't need to be given power by someone else.

Running Away from the Main Question , You pasted a wall of text about the Dead Sea Scrolls and Paul because you can’t answer the verses I gave you:
How can you defend God commanding soldiers to "slay both man and woman, infant and nursing babe" in 1 Samuel 15:3?

How do you defend Moses ordering the killing of young boys and taking 32,000 virgin girls as spoils of war in Numbers 31:17–18?
Stop hiding behind AI answers. Face your own Bible and answer the question.

[Brother Yusuf @Amiraydam]

You opened by admitting the text literally says: "Ordering the slaughter of both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep" (1 Samuel 15:3).

Then, instead of explaining how your God commanding the butchering of nursing babies is morally defensible, you spent three posts deflecting:

You blamed "Islamic mistranslation" for verses printed verbatim in Christian bibles (KJV, ESV, NIV).

You claimed other Christians simply "gloss over it because it makes them feel uncomfortable"—an admission that the verse is morally indefensible on its face.

You completely ignored Numbers 31:17–18 commanding soldiers to execute young boys and seize virgin girls as spoils of war.

Now, cornered without an argument, you hide behind a generic cliché: "The ignorant do not know they’re ignorant."

Calling someone "ignorant" while refusing to answer for the plain text of your own scripture isn't an observation it is a surrender disguised as condescension.

Step up and educate everyone, or admit you have no answer: how does an all-just God order an army to slaughter nursing infants? We are still waiting.

[Brother Yusuf @Amiraydam]

You make an emotional video claiming you want to protect children and quote Matthew 18:6 about millstones, yet you completely ignore what is written directly inside your own Old Testament scriptures:

In Numbers 31:17-18, Moses commands the slaughter of male children and non-virgin women, ordering soldiers to keep 32,000 young female virgins for themselves as spoils of war.
In 1 Samuel 15:3, the text explicitly commands: "slay both man and woman, infant and nursing babe."
In Leviticus and rabbinic tradition, the age of legal accountability and betrothal was tied strictly to puberty and physical maturity, exactly as practiced in ancient antiquity across the entire Roman and Near Eastern world.

In Islam, marriage requires explicit physical maturity, mental competence (rushd), and consent. A marriage cannot be consummated until puberty and physical capability are met, which is why Islamic jurisprudence universally conditions consummation on the physical readiness and well-being of the bride.

If judging the ancient world by modern Western legal standards is your framework, then by your own logic, every biblical patriarch and prophet from Abraham down to the kings of Israel stands condemned by your video.

Quoting Jesus about protecting little ones while ignoring that the biblical God commands the slaughter of "infants and nursing babes" is total hypocrisy. Face your own canon before lecturing others.

[Brother Yusuf @Amiraydam]

And another one hits the block button the moment their own Bible is opened.

He claimed Christian scripture prohibits violence while the Quran commands the murder of innocents.

I answered every single one of his claims with direct context, showed how he had to cut Surah 2:191 in half to invent a lie, and then challenged him to explain the explicit commands in his own canon:

1 Samuel 15:3 commanding the slaughter of "infant and nursing babe."

Numbers 31:17-18 ordering the killing of little boys and taking 32,000 young virgin girls as spoils of war.

Instead of addressing a single verse or answering why his own scripture mandates the killing of nursing infants, he threw insults, dodged every question, and blocked me.

Standard procedure: talk big, get exposed by your own book, hit block, and pretend you won.

Whoever wants to see the entire exchange and how quickly the narrative collapsed can read the thread here:
https://t.co/vkwx4ocmDD

[Tanjil Bren @TanjilBren]

@Amiraydam @shirley12136 @Neccccy No one is fleeing anything. You don't clearly don't understand scripture, and you entirely dodged the murder of 15 innocents on Bondi Beach at the hands of your fellow Muslims.

So, I'll give you one: 2:191  Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them.

[Brother Yusuf @Amiraydam]

Nobody buckled you just got caught bluffing with a citation you never read.

You claimed the Prophet said "I am possessed" in Sahih al-Bukhari 6982.

I called your bluff and gave you the exact Arabic text: "Khasheetu 'ala nafsi" ("I feared for myself").

The word "possessed" literally does not appear in the text. Not in the Arabic, not in the authentic translation, nowhere.

Instead of showing everyone where the word "possessed" is written in Bukhari 6982, you posted a meme to save face.

Quote the sentence from Bukhari 6982 that says "I am possessed," or admit to everyone you fabricated it. We're waiting.

[Brother Yusuf @Amiraydam]

"You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath... You shall not bow down to them or worship them." (Exodus 20:4–5)

If you feel insulted when Abraham rejects carved idols and statues in Quran 26:70–77, take it up with your own Ten Commandments.

The prophet Abraham didn't come to bow to plaster statues, icons, and relics he came to smash them and direct all worship to the Creator alone.

[Raymond Ibrahim @RaymondIbrahim5]

The Muslim muezzin who opened Mass inside St Peter's church at the Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium, intentionally chose to recite a Koran passage that condemns his Christian hosts as idolaters (Koran 26:70-77):

"When he [Abraham] questioned his father and his people, 'What is that you worship [besides Allah]?' They replied, 'We worship idols, to which we are fully devoted.' Abraham asked, 'Can they hear you when you call upon them? Or can they benefit or harm you?' They replied, 'No! But we found our forefathers doing the same.' Abraham responded, 'Have you [really] considered what you have been worshipping— you and your ancestors? They are [all] enemies to me, except the Lord of all worlds [Koran 26:70-77]."

Islam teaches that all Christians are idolaters (mushrikin, people who “associate” another—Jesus—with Allah). That the muezzin chose to recite this particular passage inside a Catholic church—which is full of statues and images which are anathema to Muslims—is no coincidence.

Clearly, Muslims are becoming quite emboldened. It used to be that they would recite Koran verses about how “you have your religion and I have mine” during these sham “interfaith dialogues.” But now they are openly telling the same Christians who invite them into their churches that Christianity is false.

One cannot blame their temerity seeing the degree to which slavish “Christians” are willingly capitulating to Islam.

More here: https://t.co/SBviSRJBO5

[Brother Yusuf @Amiraydam]

Comparing Jesus and Muhammad without understanding the prophetic tradition shows a complete lack of basic biblical literacy.

First, the New Testament records barely three years of public ministry from Jesus's entire life, with massive multi-decade gaps completely missing. In contrast, the life of Muhammad (pbuh) is recorded in exhaustive historical detail: as an orphan, merchant, husband, father, statesman, judge, commander, and head of state.

Second, God sent different prophets with different roles, environments, and societal responsibilities:

Moses was a political leader, legal legislator, and military commander who led an entire nation out of bondage and governed a state under God's law.
Joshua led military campaigns to conquer Canaan and establish territorial sovereignty.
David was an anointed king, military conqueror, and ruler who fought wars and administered state justice.
Solomon sat on a royal throne, managed vast wealth, commanded armies, and governed an empire.

Jesus was sent as a reformer to the "lost sheep of the house of Israel" (Matthew 15:24) living under brutal pagan Roman military occupation, without the authority to govern a state or write civil legislation.

If being a statesman, judge, and military defender invalidates Muhammad (pbuh), then by your own logic you have just disqualified Moses, Joshua, David, and Solomon as false prophets.

Furthermore, if Islam was "forced by the sword," explain why the Coptic, Syrian, and Lebanese Christian communities survived under Muslim rule for 1,400 years, while Christian Europe systematically eliminated its religious minorities through inquisitions and forced conversions.

And regarding your equation "Jesus + Holy Spirit + father = GOD": adding three distinct parts together to make one whole isn't monotheism it is mathematical polytheism.

[Brother Yusuf @Amiraydam]

Notice how you scrambled to explain Hosea as descriptive while completely running away from the actual direct commands in 1 Samuel 15 and Numbers 31.

You claimed "scripture doesn't allow it," yet you can't touch these explicit biblical commands:

In 1 Samuel 15:3, that is not a descriptive prophecy. It is a direct divine imperative: "Now go and strike Amalek and utterly destroy all that they have... slay both man and woman, infant and nursing babe..."

In Numbers 31:17-18, that is not a third-party prediction. Moses directly commands the army of God: "kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man by lying with him. But all the female children that have not known a man... keep alive for yourselves."

In Psalm 137:9, your canon literally sings: "Blessed shall he be who takes your little ones and dashes them against the rock!"

Even regarding Hosea 13:16, who decreed that judgment upon Samaria? In Hosea 13:4-16, God states He Himself is executing this wrath for their rebellion against Him.

You still haven't provided a single chapter or verse from the Quran commanding the slaughter of children, infants, or non-combatants. You can't produce one from the Quran, and you cannot defend the explicit commands to butcher nursing babies in your own text. Total deflection.

[Brother Yusuf @Amiraydam]

You just threw out a Hadith reference without reading what it actually says.

Sahih al-Bukhari 6982 is completely authentic and nowhere in it does the Prophet say "I am possessed."

Open the Arabic text right now. The literal words he spoke to Khadijah were: "Khasheetu 'ala nafsi" (خَشِيتُ عَلَى نَفْسِي) which translates to: "I feared for myself" (meaning physical exhaustion, illness, or death from the sheer magnitude of the angelic revelation).

Scholars of Hadith, including Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani in Fath al-Bari, explicitly address this phrase: it refers to fearing for his life, physical health, or that his heart could not bear the terrifying weight of the divine presence.

As for Ibn Ishaq's Sirah: Ibn Ishaq recorded historical narrations with varying chains of transmission (Isnad). The narration you are vaguely hinting at mentions the Prophet initially worrying whether he might be targeted by poetic spirits (which pagan Arabs believed inspired madness), but Khadijah and her Christian monotheist cousin Waraqa ibn Nawfal immediately recognized the revelation as the Namus (the Archangel Gabriel) who was sent to Moses.

Now, if having fear or anguish during a divine encounter disproves a prophet in your eyes, look at your own Bible:
In Luke 22:44, Jesus is so terrified and distressed in Gethsemane that his sweat becomes "like great drops of blood falling to the ground," begging God to take the cup away from him.

In Mark 3:21, the literal family of Jesus tries to seize him because they openly say: "He is out of his mind" (possessed/insane).

In Matthew 27:46, Jesus cries out on the cross: "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"

If Christ experiencing anguish, crying out to God, and being accused of madness by his own family does not make him possessed, trying to twist the awe-inspiring weight of Gabriel's revelation into "possession" is complete intellectual dishonesty. Stop parroting references you haven't read.

[Brother Yusuf @Amiraydam]

I answer any question about Islam openly, and anyone is free to ask whatever they wish. After 20+ years of studying Islamic jurisprudence, engaging in debates, and speaking with people across the globe face-to-face, on stage, and on broadcast platforms, the truth of Tawhid only becomes clearer.

Now, I turn the table. Let honest Christian apologists and scholars answer these straightforward questions directly from their own canon without dodging:

The Pure Monotheism of Jesus vs. The Trinity

In John 17:3, Jesus prays to the Father and says: "Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent."

If the Father is the only true God, how can Jesus also be that same God without either contradicting Christ’s own words or professing polytheism?

The Subordination and Ignorance Paradox

In Mark 13:32, Jesus explicitly states regarding the Last Day: "No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father."

If Jesus is co-equal, co-eternal, omniscient God Almighty, how can Almighty God be ignorant of the Hour while another "person" of God knows it? Does God have limited knowledge of Himself?

God Exalting and Anointing God?

In Hebrews 1:9, the text says to Jesus: "Therefore God, your God, has set you above your companions by anointing you."

Who is the "God" of Almighty God? And in Philippians 2:9, why did God have to "highly exalt" Jesus and give him authority if he already possessed intrinsic divine authority from eternity?

The Morality of Biblical Warfare

In 1 Samuel 15:3, God explicitly commands: "slay both man and woman, infant and nursing babe..."

In Numbers 31:17–18, Moses commands the slaughter of male children and non-virgin women, ordering soldiers to keep 32,000 virgin girls for themselves.

How do you morally condemn any historical warfare or conflict while worshiping a scripture that commands the butchering of nursing infants and the distribution of young female virgins as war booty?

Abolishing the Eternal Law

Jesus said in Matthew 5:17–19: "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets... not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands... will be called least in the kingdom of heaven."

Why did Paul abolish circumcision and dietary laws (Galatians 5:2) when Christ explicitly commanded that not even a letter of the Mosaic Law would pass away?

The Injustice of Blood Atonement

In Ezekiel 18:20, God commands: "The child will not share the guilt of the parent, nor will the parent share the guilt of the child. The righteousness of the righteous will be credited to them, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against them."

In Hosea 6:6, God says: "For I desire mercy, not sacrifice."

Why does Christian theology require the torture and execution of an innocent man to forgive sins, directly violating God’s eternal principle of individual moral accountability?

Answer these verses directly using your own Bible. No deflections, no insults just scripture.

[Brother Yusuf @Amiraydam]

You claimed: "scripture doesn't allow it. The Koran does. And you know it does."

Yet when challenged to provide a single verse from the Quran commanding the murder of children, non-combatants, or worshipers, you completely fled. Not one chapter. Not one verse.

Instead, you dismiss direct quotations from your own Bible as "utter tosh" and claim I struggle with reading biblical texts. If my comprehension is so flawed, please enlighten everyone and explain these verses directly:

1 Samuel 15:3: "Now go and strike Amalek and utterly destroy all that they have... slay both man and woman, infant and nursing babe..."
Numbers 31:17–18: "Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man by lying with him. But all the female children that have not known a man... keep alive for yourselves."

Explain to us: what does "slay infant and nursing babe" actually mean in your superior reading comprehension? What does keeping thousands of young virgin girls for soldiers mean?

You couldn't produce a single Quranic verse to back your accusation, and you cannot explain the slaughter of nursing infants written into your own canon. Dodging behind cheap insults isn't an explanation it is an outright concession.

[Brother Yusuf @Amiraydam]

"Pretends"? Islam doesn't need to pretend anything it is written in plain Hebrew and English directly in your own Bible:

The slaughter order: Moses was angry that women and boys were spared, commanding: "Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man by lying with him. But all the female children that have not known a man... keep alive for yourselves" (Numbers 31:17–18).

The census of child virgins: The text explicitly counts them: "And thirty and two thousand persons in all, of women that had not known man by lying with him" (Numbers 31:35).

God directly legislating the spoils: In Numbers 31:25–30, God explicitly tells Moses to divide these captives among the soldiers and congregation, even claiming a divine tribute quota of 32 young girls for the sanctuary (Numbers 31:40).

Nobody used the word "marriage" your biblical text ordered the execution of little boys and non-virgin women while soldiers kept 32,000 young virgin girls as spoils of war. Trying to blame Muslims for quoting your own canon word-for-word is pure denial.