I just did that thing I don't do. I shared this report in my family chat group. My 83 year old mother will leave the room when any conversation bleeds into the political. She told my wife (not me) that she doesn't like my politics when she heard I went to a political meeting. How she can not like my politics when we don't talk politics is beyond me. Only 1 of my 3 daughters who are old enough to vote in the last local elections did so. We have to change this mindset. We have to talk about the political landscape with everyone. I will share this report whenever the opportunity arrises. Well done @RupertLowe10 we need to Restore Britain
Imagine the UK in fifty years time if things don’t change and fast.
D Day celebrations - Cancelled.
The Royal Family - Exiled.
Females - All rights removed and a modest dress code is mandatory.
Christianity- Outlawed.
Churches - Decimated.
Elections - What elections?
The Army - Beating down on you.
Indigenous Brits - Jailed, Tortured or or murdered if you fail to convert.
The liberal left - Cease to exist as having proved to be useful idiots they are no longer useful.
The internet - Banned.
Music - Banned.
Freedom of speech - Banned.
Speaking out against the state - Punishable by death.
This is an insight to the future.
Think I’m joking? Then look at Iran and come back to me,
Exactly one year ago today greater Manchester police sent 10 riot police to my house for an allegation of burglary. The alleged burgled item was a plate of free chicken pasta that was being served in a migrant hotel.
I was on bail for 6 months where I was not able to leave the country, had to sleep at my home address every night, wasn’t allowed within 200 metres of any protest (planned or unplanned) and was not allowed within 100 metres of a migrant hotel or HMO. All my electronic devices were seized for 8 months and there is damage to my door and handle where they applied excessive force to it.
1 year later the case has not been dropped and is classed as RUI (released under investigation.) because of this greater Manchester Police refused to release the body cam footage of them entering my house where they searched everything from my loft and garden to my terminally ill mothers underwear drawer.
I was held in a cell for 8 hours whilst 2 CID detectives travelled from another police station to interview me who asked about my politics and my view on migrants.
Every time I now leave the country I am now greeted by customs or border force on return who ask where I have been and search my belongings/car.
If anyone says 2 tier policing does not exist show them this.
I am still fighting to get this charge dropped but I am dealing with one of the most corrupt police forces in the country!
Angela Rayner and her department have some serious questions to answer.
It has been revealed through FOI requests submitted by Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy that the Communities Department deleted all responses submitted to the Working Group tasked by Rayner with drafting the official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility”.
Nick has accused the department of a “cover-up” and wants to establish whether extremist groups influenced the process.
Since its publication, the definition has been used to silence legitimate criticism and debate about Islam. It has revived Britain’s blasphemy laws for Islam alone.
Public, private and charitable bodies have been encouraged to adopt the new non-statutory definition — with some, such as South Wales Police, going even further.
The Free Speech Union exposed at the start of the year that all five members of the Working Group had troubling links to Islamist organisations, including the Muslim Council of Britain and MEND — both of which successive governments have adopted a policy of non-engagement with since 2009 due to concerns about extremism.
Nick Timothy has said: “Labour must come clean on whether extremist groups helped to draft their ‘Islamophobia’ definition.
“Ministers have refused to answer whether these groups influenced the definition despite a no-contact policy, and we now know that the Government deleted every single response that the working group received.
“This is clearly a cover-up under way, and the public have a right to know whether a definition the Government is asking the entire public and private sector to adopt was influenced by the views of extremists.”
This is a truly astonishing admission. The Government introduced what amounts to a de facto Islamic blasphemy law in Britain, it could have been influenced by Islamist extremists, and it then deleted all the evidence submitted to the Working Group.
Questions must be answered.
Read more below 👇
Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 is the real problem.
It criminalises “grossly offensive” messages with wording that dates back to 1884–1935 postal and telephone rules aimed at one-to-one abuse. It was never designed for social media.
The Online Safety Act 2023 left the “grossly offensive” limb intact.
(Thank you Tories)
That vagueness hands magistrates wide discretion, to punish those who they are ideologically opposed, with no jury.
The law is too broad, too old, and too open to selective application.
2 Englishmen have been jailed this week for protests in Epping last summer following an invader attacking a local woman and young girl in the town.
Charlie Land, 24, and Jonathan Glover, 48, received LONGER sentences in prison than the sex attacker invader received!
@andrewc44104127 We should re-set it. Give it where its needed, if you are co-operating with us, including taking your people back if they happen to sail over here.
‘It was one joke, not targeted at anybody, pointing out certain parts of Islam.’
Former police officer and foster carer Stephen Gray recounts his experience of being charged for resharing a post criticising Islam, raising questions about a potential backdoor to blasphemy laws.
Parliament voted to abolish the blasphemy laws 18 years ago, yet the Starmer Government has revived them through the back door — and for Islam alone.
In a free society, no religion should be afforded greater protection than others or shielded from legitimate criticism, challenge or debate.
We have already seen the “anti-Muslim hostility” definition weaponised by activists and even some Labour MPs to silence criticism of Islam.
Iqbal Mohamed, the pro-Gaza Independent MP, pushed the former Communities Secretary to incorporate the definition into the Nolan Principles for Public Life, meaning MPs and peers who spoke about issues such as the grooming gangs scandal or Islamist extremism could face sanctions.
Nick Timothy, the Shadow Justice Secretary, was branded an Islamophobe, reported by Labour MPs to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards and even faced calls to resign from the then Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, after criticising the mass Muslim public prayer event in Trafalgar Square.
28 Labour MPs wrote to the Equality and Human Rights Commission to report Reform UK for Islamophobia and urged it to investigate after a number of the party’s MPs criticised the Trafalgar Square event.
South Wales Police adopted a gold-plated, beefed-up version of the “anti-Muslim hostility” definition that instructed officers to record any comment that went beyond “legitimate” discussion of Islam. After the Free Speech Union threatened legal action, the force withdrew the guidance.
We must not allow this de facto Islamic blasphemy law to take root.
@RTCORGUK No parts of the country should have undocumented foreigners living nearby. Undocumented foreigners should be detained securely and allowed to leave the country, not roam the country.
Absolute state of this.
Young lad purchases a baseball bat in "Modern England".
As soon as he leaves the store, police grab him for "carrying a weapon".
The bat is literally still in it's plastic covering.
🚨 THIS IS EXACTLY WHY SO MANY OF US ARE SICK OF IT.
Two young British girls on a night out, visibly scared.
A bloke notices something isn’t right, walks over and starts asking if they’re okay. He checks whether the men hanging around them are actually WITH them.
The girls say NO.
One of the men is stood outside the club in jogging bottoms. The girls look terrified.
So this stranger refuses to just walk past and mind his own business. He stays with them and tells the men straight:
STOP HARASSING GIRLS.
And afterwards? The girls THANK him for stepping in.
This is what women and girls are dealing with.
A night out. Walking to a mate’s. Going to the shops. Getting home at night. Constantly looking over your shoulder and wondering whether that bloke following you is going to leave you alone.
And apparently we’re supposed to pretend nobody can see what’s happening?
We’re not “imagining” it.
WE’RE LIVING IT.
When are people going to stop pretending everything is fine?
Massive credit to the man who saw two frightened young women and actually DID something instead of walking away. 👏🇬🇧
More men like this.
#UKNews #WomensSafety #ProtectWomen #Britain #UKFrontlineMedia
@yvon33630127@Jenny_1884 Yep, they end up on UC, If they've been prudent & have savings or capital, they're penalized. They should not be classed the same as someone who can, but doesn't work