@ClayTravis I was just reading yesterday that a case in CT has been on hold waiting on this result. Now that the SC has ruled on this case the article predicted that case will end up in the SC in short order & since that case is brought by girls against the state law would make it national.
@JohnLeFevre One of my professors in college had us read Lords of Poverty by Graham Hancock. It was really enlightening and I've never blindly trusted NGOs or charities since. It seems like it has only become more true since that book was published in 1989.
@KonstantinKisin MO Amendment 5 is trying to change the tax structure away from income tax. Any help @elonmusk or @KonstantinKisin can give to make sure if passes would be appreciated to offset the $$$$ pouring in from out of state to try to defeat it.
@walkeri141 Did you mean to say Florida or USC? Mizzou is almost never ranked preseason and when they are it is because they finished top 10 the year before.
@magopolitics@TheLaurenChen Or, starting with baseline knowledge they likely alread know to make sure they are up to speed before getting into the details they very likely do not know but then stop as you realize they already stopped listening.
@paulg@aravind@grok Just because people are enemies doesn't mean they are opposites. It just means they are rivals. In this case both trying to gain power with many similar beliefs namely collectivism. One was just nationalistic and the other internationalist
@ClayTravis The judge also had the full history of the person to make an informed decision. A bartender has to try and rely on observable clues while also helping dozens of other customers.
@EliseStefanik@MikeTannousis It is intentional. Move the middle class to be dependent on government programs and it is another new constituency that will fight to preserve and expand then. Thus more government power
@Timcast There are 4 other "sections" of federal law that authorize the executive to issue tariffs. This only struck down 1 of the 5. I am guessing the admin already has a plan in place to replace them using one of the 4 other options.
@JacquiHeinrich that leaves 4 other "sections" of federal law that authorize the executive to issue tarriffs. This only struck down 1 of the 5. I am guessing the admin already has a plan in place to replace them using one of the 4 other options.