Arkonların Gizli Menüsü: İlahi Kıvılcımın Düşük Frekans Rezonansı
Arkonlar, ışığı doğrudan yiyip sindiremezler (Çünkü Işık Onları Yakar); bunun yerine ışığı "Düşük Frekanslı Duygusal Dalgalara" dönüştürerek emerler. Saf İlahi Ruh (Nur), kendi orijinal halinde yüksek frekanslı bir bütündür ve Arkonlar buna dokunamaz. Ancak bu ruh, etten ve kemikten bir biyolojik bedenin içinde, bedenin sinir sistemi ve beyni vasıtasıyla "Duygulara" dönüştürülür. Arkonlar insanın saf ruhunu değil, o ruhun maddeyle sürtünmesinden doğan negatif duygusal enerjiyi emebilirler. İnsan korktuğunda veya acı çektiğinde, içindeki o canlı tanrısal ışık "Sızıntı" yapar; etrafa yayılan bu düşük frekanslı radyasyon, inorganik Arkonlar için muazzam bir besin, adeta bir pildir. Onlar bizim acımızla şarj olurlar. Bu sızan enerjiye Gnostik literatürde "Işık Tohumlarının Çalınması", modern yorumlarda ise Loosh denir. İnsan korkmayı, öfkelenmeyi ve maddeye tapmayı bıraktığı an, Arkonların beslendiği o duygusal Sızıntı (Frekans) kesilir. Parazit beslenemediğinde, sistem çöker ve insan ruhu o inorganik hayaletin kapsama alanından çıkarak özgürleşir. Hatta gerçek sevgi ve saf mutluluk, bu inorganik hayaletler için besin olmak bir yana, onların mekanik sistemini çökerten ölümcül birer zehirdir. Gerçek Sevgi ve Koşulsuz Mutluluk, insanın içindeki o saf ilahi kaynağın (Pleroma'nın) yeryüzündeki doğrudan izdüşümüdür. Bu enerjilerin frekansı ve voltajı o kadar yüksektir ki, Arkonların bünyesi bu elektriği kaldıramaz. İnsan artık onların radarlarında görünmez hale gelir; çünkü frekansı, Arkonların algılayamayacağı kadar yukarılara tırmanmıştır. Onlar ancak ruhun "Kalitesi Düşürülmüş", etle ve korkuyla bulanmış alt türevlerini sindirebilirler.
This NASA scientist died three times, and each time she crossed that line, she claims it felt like she was entering a deeper reality beyond the physical world, where consciousness felt vast, intelligent, and somehow everything seemed connected.
Ingrid Honkala, a 55-year-old, says she stopped seeing us as separate people and began seeing humans as “expressions of consciousness.” She believes death is not an end, but a transition in an ongoing flow of consciousness.
At age 3, Ingrid drowned in a 900-gallon water tank. When her mother found her, she says her body was lifeless.
She claims that while underwater, the fear suddenly disappeared. She felt complete peace, saw a bright light, and then saw her own body floating below her.
Her first thought:
“I am not this body.”
She says she entered a place filled with love and light, where she felt connected to everything. She claimed she could see things happening away from her body.
She described seeing the maid listening to a radio drama and sensing her mother rushing back home, details she says were later confirmed.
After being revived, she told her family she did not belong here and wanted to return to that place.
She says it happened again at age 25 & 52
One interesting part is that she says these experiences did not make her reject science. Instead, they pushed her toward science.
She earned a PhD in Marine Science and worked in scientific fields connected with organizations, including NASA and the United States Navy.
She believes science and spirituality do not have to be enemies. She says, "two different ways of exploring the same mystery."
She believes consciousness might not simply be something created by the brain, but something deeper.
AUTHENTICITY IS THE MOST POWERFUL GUIDE OF ALL
Many of us who go through a spiritual awakening feel called to help others, to share what we’ve discovered, sometimes even feeling it’s “our mission.”
The truth is, no one can be awakened by force. Everyone has their own timing, their own lessons, and their own pace. The deepest way to support others is simply through your presence,by being yourself, by living with authenticity, calm, and love.
Awakened souls influence others not by preaching or convincing, but by showing another way of being: listening without judgment, holding space, staying grounded, and radiating quiet light. Often, the most powerful impact comes from what we don’t do, we don’t criticize, impose, or place ourselves above others.
Spiritual growth isn’t about being “better.” It’s a journey of consciousness, and true humility comes from living your truth quietly and fully. The way we speak, act, and simply exist can be a beacon for others.
We help not by waking others, but by living in a way that inspires awakening naturally. When someone is ready, they will be drawn in. Authenticity is the most powerful guide of all.
~ Adrianna Garay
✨🙌🏾💫
Let me explain exactly why VLC is free despite 6B downloads, because no one seems to get it.
VLC doesn’t make money because making money would destroy the only thing that made it reach 6 billion downloads in the first place.
The player grew through a specific distribution loop: tech-savvy users install it once, it works perfectly on every weird video file they throw at it, and they recommend it to everyone forever. IT departments deploy it across entire companies. A Reddit comment from 2009 still drives downloads in 2025 because the answer never changed.
That recommendation engine dies the second ads appear. Not slowly. Immediately.
The users who drive VLC’s distribution are the exact people who understand what ads mean. Your incentives just switched from “make the best player” to “maximize impressions.” They see it, stop recommending it, and your growth engine shuts off.
Run the actual numbers. VLC gets maybe 50 million active users daily across 6 billion total downloads. Typical video player ad rates run $1-3 CPM. Even if you served ads on every playback session, you’re looking at maybe $50-150 million annually at absolute peak optimistic assumptions.
Sounds like a lot until you realize what Kempf actually traded it for.
VLC reaching 6 billion people made Kempf the person who built the infrastructure everyone depends on. He runs a video consulting business. He built dav1d, an AV1 codec that powers modern streaming. Being “the guy who kept VLC free” opens every door in video technology. Clients pay him to solve problems because he proved he optimizes for quality over quick monetization.
“Former ad-supported media player executive” gets you exactly zero of that leverage.
The people celebrating Kempf’s ethics are missing the calculation. He didn’t sacrifice millions for principles. He rejected $150M in highly uncertain ad revenue to build permanent positioning worth multiples of that in everything else he touches.
VLC free generates more value for Kempf than VLC monetized ever could. The trade was never even close.
Evalúe Usted:
LUMA RECIBE DE MÁS, ENTREGA DE MENOS Y AÚN SE QUEJA DE “FALTA DE FONDOS”
Por Luis Raúl Torres Cruz
Miércoles, 29 de octubre de 2025
Los documentos oficiales no mienten. Las gráficas que ves aquí, preparadas por la propia Autoridad de Energía Eléctrica (AEE) y la Autoridad de las Alianzas Público Privadas (AAPP), muestran con absoluta claridad cómo LUMA Energy ha recibido cientos de millones de dólares más de los que le correspondían, mientras deposita menos dinero del que cobra a los clientes.
LUMA maneja el dinero de los consumidores, pero no lo deposita completo. Cada mes, LUMA cobra las facturas de todos los abonados y deposita ese dinero en las cuentas de la AEE. Sin embargo, la tabla del “Flow of Funds” demuestra que LUMA tiene control total y acceso en tiempo real a todas las cuentas y es quien decide cuándo y cuánto transfiere al fondo general de la AEE.
Ahí está el problema: los depósitos mensuales de LUMA son mucho menores a lo que cobra a los clientes, lo que deja al fondo de la AEE con menos efectivo disponible. Aun así, LUMA presenta “reclamos mensuales” de fondos públicos para cubrir sus gastos, como si el dinero no existiera. En palabras simples: LUMA controla el dinero, no lo deposita completo y luego culpa a la AEE de no tener liquidez.
¿Dónde está el dinero que pagamos? Cada mes, los consumidores pagamos cientos de millones de dólares a LUMA Energy por el servicio eléctrico. Según los datos oficiales, LUMA cobra entre $270 y $347 millones mensuales, pero solo deposita una parte de esos fondos en las cuentas de la AEE. El resto del dinero se queda temporalmente bajo el control directo de LUMA, en cuentas que la propia empresa administra llamadas “operating account”, “capital account”, “contingency reserve” y “outage events reserve”. Estas cuentas, como indica el propio documento de flujo de fondos, están bajo “total visibilidad y control en tiempo real” de LUMA, no de la AEE. En palabras sencillas:
👉🏻LUMA tiene el dinero primero, decide cuánto transfiere y cuándo lo hace.
👉🏻Mientras tanto, la AEE aparece con menos efectivo disponible, lo que crea la falsa impresión de que “no hay liquidez”.
👉🏻Esa supuesta falta de liquidez se usa luego por LUMA como excusa para pedir más dinero al gobierno y justificar aumentos en la tarifa del servicio eléctrico o reclamos presupuestarios ante el Negociado de Energía y la Junta de Supervisión Fiscal.
Así, el pueblo paga religiosamente su factura, pero el dinero no llega completo a donde debe llegar. Esa es la raíz del problema financiero que se le achaca a la AEE, cuando en realidad LUMA es quien controla el flujo y retiene los fondos que deberían sostener el sistema eléctrico del país.
PREPA (AEE) ha transferido más dinero del necesario a LUMA. La segunda tabla, sobre las transferencias de fondos de PREPA a las cuentas operacionales de LUMA demuestra algo todavía más grave:
durante los últimos cuatro años fiscales (2022 al 2025), la AEE le ha transferido a LUMA cantidades mayores a las que la propia empresa había presupuestado. Por ejemplo:
• En el 2023, LUMA recibió $356 millones más de lo que su presupuesto autorizaba.
• En el 2024, la diferencia fue de $418 millones adicionales.
En total, más de $850 millones extra han sido enviados a LUMA por encima de su propio presupuesto, según las cifras oficiales.
¿Y qué ha hecho LUMA con ese dinero? La propia empresa reconoce que parte de esos fondos se usaron para “proyectos que considera reembolsables” con fondos federales, pero admite que más de $1,200 millones aún no han sido devueltos. Además, gastó más de $300 millones en emergencias sin notificar a las agencias reguladoras ni contar con una fuente clara de financiamiento.
El resultado es evidente, mientras LUMA y Genera PR acaparan el control del dinero público y de los pagos de los consumidores, el sistema eléctrico sigue colapsando, los apagones son cada vez más frecuentes y el pueblo continúa pagando tarifas más altas.
(Post adjunto)
1.2 millones personas reciben PAN en Puerto Rico. 434,311 son adultos mayores. 260,347 son menores.
69,680 son adultos con diversidad funcional. 252,470 tienen empleo. Eso suma 1,016,808 personas. ¿Dónde están los vagos que sigue viendo tu PREJUICIADA mente?
When President Clinton banned assault rifles in 1994, mass shootings dropped by 43%. After Republicans let the ban expire in 2004, they increased by 243% — please don’t tell me bans don’t work, because I don’t want to hear it.
MEN SHOULDN’T BE AFRAID TO MOAN
MEN SHOULDN’T BE AFRAID TO MOAN
MEN SHOULDN’T BE AFRAID TO MOAN
MEN SHOULDN’T BE AFRAID TO MOAN
MEN SHOULDN’T BE AFRAID TO MOAN
MEN SHOULDN’T BE AFRAID TO MOAN
MEN SHOULDN’T BE AFRAID TO MOAN
MEN SHOULDN’T BE AFRAID TO MOAN