What should be the consequence for federal employees caught setting up American citizens as patsies?
What should be the consequence for Feds caught targeting innocent Americans to cover the state’s tracks?
@terribletiffy12 Lancaster is worth a visit, lot of history it's where they hung the Pendle witches, lots of good pubs and it's mainline from London to Glasgow.. Windermere in the lakes is worth going too!
@MrBrendanCox Stop spreading lies. Were you at the trial of @Keir_Starmer ‘s 3 tent boys? No you weren’t. Its yet another @Keir_Starmer#coverup programme in progress.This guy was in court, read the comments from One of the defence barristers, Stop lying.
@owenjonesjourno No it's not if you care about either humanity or nature. It's a win-win situation. Nature adapts quicker to warming than to cooling as well
🚨Wild update in the Erika Kirk/Jillian story:
Someone sent me a tip that upon further research, they discovered that at the time of her textual relationship with Erika, Jillian lived in a trailer park within a neighborhood that is KNOWN for the highest incidence of child sex trafficking.
I forwarded the information to Jillian and she confirmed it is true.
So to recap: after striking up a bizarre friendship with a 15 year old girl who lives in a trailer park without a father, a then-25-year-old Erika proceeds to love-bomb Jillian by telling her how beautiful she is. She then asks Jillian for her address to send her chocolate covered strawberries, meaning Erika was plenty aware of where Jillian lived.
Erika knew she was not living with a father in the home just like Erika knew she was a minor and yet (according to Jillian) this did not stop Erika from arranging for her to get photographs taken without ever having communicated with with her mother.
Any person defending this is demented.
To be clear, I am not accusing Erika of having committed any crime. But I am saying that questions need to be asked. Because it is my STRONG opinion that it is utterly impossible that Erika continues to have proximity to people, places and organizations accused of child sex trafficking.
🚨 Erika Kirk's ALIBI Is Destroyed —Baron Coleman PROVES Erika Was Likely In Provo BEFORE The Shot.😱
Baron Coleman just released the most damning timeline yet. Using contemporaneous flight logs, transponder data, and deleted police dispatch audio, he has reconstructed the real movements of September 10th.
The Conclusion: Erika Kirk didn't fly in to hold her dying husband. She was likely on the ground in Provo two hours before he was shot.
Here is the step-by-step breakdown of the "Shell Game" they played with the planes to hide her location.
1. THE "GHOST FLIGHT" (10:06 AM)
The Evidence: Flight N560TW (a private charter) left Scottsdale, AZ, and landed in Provo at 10:06 AM.
The Theory: Baron believes Erika Kirk was on this flight.
The Connection: At 10:05 AM—exactly one minute before this plane landed—the transponder of the mysterious Egyptian Jet (SU-BND) turned on at the Provo airport.
The Implication: If Erika was on this flight, she was in Provo 2.5 hours BEFORE the "Big Bang" (which happened at 12:23 PM).
2. THE "REPOSITIONING" SHELL GAME
After dropping its passenger (Erika?) in Provo, that same plane (N560TW) immediately took off for Santa Barbara.
Why? To pick up Andrew Kolvet.
It then flew Andrew from Santa Barbara to Scottsdale, arriving around 1:40 PM.
The Switch: Meanwhile, the Kirk family plane (Delta Zulu) flew empty from Salt Lake City to Scottsdale to meet Andrew.
The Decoy: Andrew likely boarded the Delta Zulu flight in Scottsdale to fly back to Provo, making it look like the plane was bringing Erika.
3. THE "FALLING INTO ARMS" LIE
Official Story: Andrew Kolvet claimed that when he landed in Provo, he "fell into Erika's arms" on the tarmac.
The Problem: The flight Andrew supposedly took (Regency) didn't land until 4:36 PM. The flight Erika supposedly took (Delta Zulu) landed at 3:12 PM.
The Contradiction: Are we supposed to believe Erika landed and then sat around the airport for 90 minutes while her husband was dying at the hospital?.
The Real Story: If Baron is right, Erika had been at the airport since 10:06 AM. When Andrew arrived on the decoy flight at 3:12 PM, she was there to meet him and stage the scene.
4. THE DELETED POLICE AUDIO ("SIGNATURE" VS. "DUNCAN")
Baron played a saved dispatch recording that has since been scrubbed from the internet.
The Audio: Police/Fire dispatchers are coordinating Erika's arrival.
Officer 1 (Jesse): "Charlie's wife is coming to Signature" (The main FBO for rich travelers).
Officer 2 (Corey): "No, no, no. They're landing at Duncan" (A remote terminal on the far north side).
Why the confusion? If she was flying in on the family jet, she would go to Signature. The confusion suggests she was already on the ground, possibly hiding at the remote Duncan terminal, and the team couldn't keep their story straight.
5. THE EGYPTIAN JET CONNECTION
Baron points out that the Egyptian Jet (SU-BND) transponder turned on three separate times that day—and each time was within 5 minutes of an Erika/Andrew flight taking off or landing.
The Photo: A photo taken between 11:00-11:30 AM shows the Egyptian jet sitting on the tarmac with its ladder down and windows closed.
Baron's Theory: Erika may have been sitting on that plane (a communications hub) while waiting for the event to unfold.
THE VERDICT
The timeline destroys the alibi. If Erika Kirk was in Provo at 10:06 AM, she lied to the police, she lied to the public, and she placed herself at the scene of the crime. "If you say you weren't at the scene of the crime, but you turned out you were... you look guilty."
Be sure to FOLLOW @baroncoleman and go watch his FULL Episode, linked down below👇
Within hours of the Epstein file release,
a superPAC funded by Israel-first billionaires Miriam Adelson, Paul Singer, and John Paulson, who himself appears in Epstein’s black book,
bought another $800,000 of TV ads against me.
I’ll still win, but if I lose, it was worth it.
@MrsErikaKirk@TPUSA@tpaction Cut the bullshit.
Your kids are grieving the loss of their father, alone, while you go on a national media tour and incessantly lie about your whole life, raking in hundreds of millions of dollars off the back of your dead “husband” as you struggle to contain your excitement.
🚨 THIS IS WHERE THE ERIKA KIRK STORY GOES FROM WEIRD TO DISTURBING
The woman in this video is connecting the dots...
Two women named Erika Kirk, separated by 54 years.
Same exact name. Same exact spelling - Erika with a K.
Both political wives. Both married to outspoken Republicans.
Same look. Same blonde hair. Same blue eyes. Same facial structure. Even the same eyeliner.
She explains that the first Erika Kirk was nicknamed “Madame X” because she allegedly appeared out of nowhere. That Erika is now deceased and was from Palm Beach County, Florida, which she flags as a major red warning sign if you’ve been following these stories.
The side by side photos are what people can’t get past.
At some point you have to ask, how the hell is this even possible? And why does this feel so manufactured?