@kanahaus We Quebecers we’ve endured and suffered, but when a Quebecer has suffered enough, whe strike back, and BOOM! The opponent is completely wiped off the map (like the CAQ), and there’s no coming back from that. We are good, tolerant, and quiet people, but "enough is enough." Period.
@bcbluecon Very simple! Quebecers are fed up being ripped off. The people of Quebec are quiet, peaceful, and silent—they tend to endure things—but, as the saying goes, "beware of still waters." When the door opens... BOOM! They strike. And there is no turning back.
@andr_turcot Parce que ces québécois sont ignorant des impacts de l'immigration de masse. Ils regardent Radio canada ou tva et se laissent dont influencer par des médias destructeurs
@EricLDaugh Canada has been governed for a very long time. Pierre Elliott Trudeau—who served as Prime Minister from April 20, 1968, to June 4, 1979, and again from March 3, 1980, to June 30, 1984, under the Liberal Party banner—had already begun to destroy Canada.
@hassinhadi Il devrait plutôt demander au peuple québecois ce qu'ils veulent et non un avis juridique. Nous, le peuple, avons droit de parole et nous ne voulons pas prêter allégeance à quelqu'un qui n'a pas d'affaire chez-nous
@hassinhadi Bien sûr qu'il le peut, Fuck le roi. il n'a pas d'affaire au Québec . Il n'est pas notre roi et il n'est pas mon roi. Nous ne prêterons pas allégeance à ce pinguin
@Tablesalt13 In addition he should consider the elderly who have done so much for Quebec, only to find themselves—as a "thank you"—living in abject poverty. $568 a month certainly doesn't make a person rich or self-sufficient. This segment of society is too often overlooked.
@LiorBibasMD@X En toute honnêteté, ta question suscite de vraies questionnements dans son soi véritable. Ton exposé est direct, franc et honnête. Chacune et chacun doit lire ton écrit et se questionner honnêtement. Merci pour tes questions
@BertaProudDad Let's be realistic. The separatists did not win. The PQ received only 28% of the vote, while 72% went to other parties—which amounts to saying that 72% of Quebecers said NO to Quebec's separation. A wake-up call is underway, slowly but surely.
@Librechoix99 J'en ai assez de l'entendre. Pourquoi lorsqu'il se passe quelque chose, c'est toujours la faute à Trump? Une fourmi copule, faute à Trumps. Un nuage passe dans le ciel, faute à Trump. Ce pourrais- t'il qu'il y a la maladie spychologique du mauvais jugement.
@bruce_barrett First, the statistics are as rigged as election results. Meanwhile, the public is asleep; people don't stop to reflect—they act on impulse, unaware of the stakes and the impact. Graphically speaking: IMPOSSIBLE; this is just a bluff, nothing more.
@Tablesalt13 The only downside: you have to speak French. That is not a downside, but a matter of respect for our language and our culture. We are proud of our language, and we always will be.
@kennydob It’s all just a charade on the part of the politicians. They try to convince the people they are powerful, but meanwhile, Canadians are tossing them in the trash, and their day of reckoning is fast approaching.
@Elenstd1 Regarde la réalité en face. Le PQ n'a que 28% des voix, 72% des voix sont des autres partis, ce qui revient à dire que 72% des québécois ont dit NON à la séparation du Québec. Restons réaliste