@warwick512@DavidGe23416874 But you're ignoring the 5 seats on the left for TPM, and the fact that those voters gave all their votes to the greens giving them an extra 2 seats as well? You have every right to be biased but it's hard to argue when the right bloc also won the popular vote.
@warwick512@DavidGe23416874 Add up the party vote on the right, and then add up the party vote on the left. You are conveniently ignoring half the data. Come back and let us know how the result changes. Just the party vote remember.
@adnanbelushi Wonder what the taxpayer budget for legal will be if they do. That aside. This will be a short investigation and will be dropped is my guess.
@2ETEKA They would have needed 37% just to get one extra seat. However, had they backed the strategy, they would likely have gotten Bishop and Goldsmith back at least. Act and NZF would have secured a solid win for the right and luxon would only partially have looked like a fool.
@punronounceable@SeanPlunket Well based on that, let's say 70 electorate seats and 50 party seats. National won 42 electorates, and 30% of the vote so 15 list seats. Act would get 4 and NZF 3, a 4 seat majority for the coalition in a 120 seats in fact act and nat could govern alone.
@PinkoPoliticus@SeanPlunket@top_nz Typical greens supporter. Doesn't have anything smart to say, so shouts it hoping that by being louder will make it more true. Back to eating crayons now sunshine.
@Democract_1947 The stupidest thing ever, the contactless aerial goes round the outer edge of the card, as soon as he linished the card, it would have broken. The pay wave chip has nothing to do with the chip he preserved.
@LeeStewartNZ@NMowbray23 No it won't, the overhang is only created by making sure one party gets more electorate seats than party seats ie if you vote party to act, that will, count towards an mp, if you candidate vote NZF that person will simply deduct votes from the nzf party, so it's wasted.