Is “scientific consensus” being selectively shaped?
Yes! The proof: Censorship in scientific publishing after a paper on potential mRNA vaccine-related cancer risks faced 16 rejections — including reversals after peer review acceptance
https://t.co/meRRXqe5Te
1/24
#Facemask#mask
Although there was no evidence for the effectiveness of masks against viruses at the time, they became mandatory during the pandemic despite harbouring unknown toxicological risks.
https://t.co/Z0BuaBtBYn
This thread summarises the scientific papers´ content
Peer reviewed systematic review evaluates and proves that children have been tormented during the pandemic with masks and exposed to health risks by mandates.
https://t.co/QpgpHwNq0q
This must be addressed, with consequences. Now it is up to the lawyers.
#mask#facemask#masks
To hell with censorship: “Content … breached Twitter’s COVID-19 policies … potentially harmful information … This false claim and call to action contradict official information on face mask efficay … undermines Government advice." Face masks don’t work https://t.co/NgmrdrdH8E.
1/15
#Mask#Facemask
the world's leading scientific breathing experts comment on masks in their brandnew publication.
Their verdict is scathing!
https://t.co/ANWMctNHrW
In this thread I try to summarize the key messages of their brand new publication
🧵1/7
FASCINATING:
Face #masks impair the immune system!
The effects of >6h mask wearing on blood count
https://t.co/9CKIHBDCVr
Since this important mask study is not available for everyone, I have made a thread with screenshots (excerpts).
1/8
#Mask: No proof of the effectiveness against viruses
https://t.co/m6Z4jvwda5
Strong Evidence of ineffectiveness exists!
Authors try to support the narrative with observational studies, but neglect numerous observational studies that prove the ineffectiveness of masks, see 5/8
1/6🧵
Absolutely breathtaking (new review):
In reliable human experiments face #masks lead to 1.41–3.2% carbon dioxide breathing, exceeding both NIOSH limits for CO2 respiration:
-acute limit for 15 min: 3% CO2
-chronic limit for 8 h:: 0.5% CO2
https://t.co/HCb2mTyoZE
1/24
#Facemask#mask
Although there was no evidence for the effectiveness of masks against viruses at the time, they became mandatory during the pandemic despite harbouring unknown toxicological risks.
https://t.co/Z0BuaBtBYn
This thread summarises the scientific papers´ content
Für unsere Kinder!
Unsere neue peer-reviewte Meta-Studie bei Frontiers beweist:
Maskenpflichten quälten während der Pandemie Kinder und verursachten Gesundheitsrisiken.
https://t.co/cmf9YbdwXD
Jetzt müssen Anwälte handeln.
#KinderSchützen#NieWieder#MaskenSchaden#Maske
@corona_realism In Kürze (noch im März) kommt eine Review in einem bekannten peer reviewten Journal zu Kindern und Marken von uns raus. Die hat extrem brisante Details.
Interessant ist auch diese bis dato völlig unbeachtet Arbeit von uns:
https://t.co/Z0BuaBtBYn
Für unsere Kinder!
Unsere neue peer-reviewte Meta-Studie bei Frontiers beweist:
Maskenpflichten quälten während der Pandemie Kinder und verursachten Gesundheitsrisiken.
https://t.co/cmf9YbdwXD
Jetzt müssen Anwälte handeln.
#KinderSchützen#NieWieder#MaskenSchaden#Maske
Peer reviewed systematic review evaluates and proves that children have been tormented during the pandemic with masks and exposed to health risks by mandates.
https://t.co/QpgpHwNq0q
This must be addressed, with consequences. Now it is up to the lawyers.
#mask#facemask#masks
1/6🧵
Absolutely breathtaking (new review):
In reliable human experiments face #masks lead to 1.41–3.2% carbon dioxide breathing, exceeding both NIOSH limits for CO2 respiration:
-acute limit for 15 min: 3% CO2
-chronic limit for 8 h:: 0.5% CO2
https://t.co/HCb2mTyoZE