Hate speech laws (+ symbol/slogan/salute bans) r un-Australian, a gross affront 2 free speech & a disgrace 2 Western values. They must be repealed in full now!
To quote a fellow Tweeter: "Don’t cry because it’s over. Smile because it happened. Thank you @Lauren_Southern for being one of the very first to stand up against the radical left. Thank you for speaking out & making yourself heard even when that meant being branded a terrorist"!
As a woman with logic & common sense, I have to agree sadly.
But there are also many of us that aren’t batshit crazy, brainwashed & still have a functioning brain but the problem is that the batshit crazy ones are promoted, raised up, platformed & put into positions of power that they did not earn or deserve.
Women: “our hormones fluctuate so much that it’s normal to have thoughts of murdering our own children.”
Same women: “if women ruled the world, we’d have world peace.”
We are witnessing the disintegration of the female psyche under the weight of a society that has stripped women of their natural purpose, replaced it with performative narcissism, and then gaslighted them into believing their resulting misery is a "systemic oppression" rather than the logical consequence of their own choices and societal upheaval. �
Dear men,
Please take control back in society.
Women are killing children and voting for abortions up to full term, voting for immigration at full speed
Feminism is a genocide of all civilization.
Liberal women are arguing that Lindsay Clancy shouldn’t be held responsible for killing her children because she was on psychotropic medications, had a hormonal imbalance, was postpartum, and had a husband who “didn’t do enough.”
But these same women want a woman-run country.
So how does that work?
If a hormonal imbalance or common medications can supposedly make a woman incapable of being held responsible for her actions, why would we want women making decisions for an entire country?🤔
This is actually insane. Communist legal concepts used to suppress nationalism in the 1920s USSR is now part of the legal basis being used by the Australian government to justify hate speech laws and the banning of political parties.
It sounds like a conspiracy, but sections 51 and 61 of our Constitution give the Commonwealth a pathway to turn international treaty obligations into Australian law. That means communist concepts pushed through the UN decades ago can now reappear here through the treaty system. All enabled by Labor. Highly recommend reading this article for more info:
@TruthFairy131 When Russia starts offering asylum to Australians fleeing their own government’s “destructive ideologies,” you know things have gone completely off the rails.
What a time to be alive.
Lindsay Clancy methodically killed her three children one by one while her husband was out running errands.
Women on TikTok have raised $715,000 for her defense.
"Many of us know we could have been only one step away from doing those horrific things."
No. We don't see ourselves in a woman who murdered her three children.
She sent her husband out first. This was premeditated. That's not postpartum depression, that's first degree murder.
We understand, the problem is you don't. You don't understand hierarchy, you don't understand duty; you don't understand men.
Male social status in the West is the lowest it's ever been. Yes, ever. There has never been a point where young men get berated exclusively as the cause of all social ills. We spend every day being blamed for shit outside our control, and then systematically barred from any authority, any prestige, any positions that might let us fix the problem. "You'd be in a lower position socially!" is acceptable if it lets us fix the problem.
Men are not concerned with hierarchy, we understand our place in it. The issue arises when we are systematically locked out of that hierarchy, when the tribe definitely enslaves us as a lesser caste to benefit everyone else. EVERYONE losing ALL their rights and privileges would be a net gain for young men.
And this goes back to you complaining about incels being hostile and suspicious towards you, years ago. You didn't understand at the time why, why these guys who nominally just wanted female affection were so hostile about it. You didn't understand why these guys would instinctively lash out at you when you asked what they wanted. You didn't understand, you couldn't understand.
These two things, the disempowerment and dissolution of Gynocratic and Geriatric society and resolving the issue of men unable to find partners at all are connected. They are, in fact, the same problem; a society that is at its core hostile to young men. Young White men in particular, who always bear the brunt of the blame for everything. Young men are asking to just be treated fairly, to not be attacked at every turn and what they get in response is totalized hostility. We get blamed for black welfare queens and their half-dozen joglet future-criminals consuming phenomenal volumes of state resources. We get blamed for the geriatrics not getting their stimmy cheques. We get blamed for women wrecking their lives with drugs and casual sex. We get blamed when a mother, apropos of nothing, murders her children. We are already at the bottom, there is nowhere for the White man to go but up.
Men will accept responsibility, as we always have, if only we are rewarded in turn for it. Voting is a responsibility, and so we must be conscious voters. The capacity for violence is a responsibility, and so we must know restraint. Impregnating a woman and caring for the child is a responsibility, and so we must protect and provide resources to them. Our biology screams at us to do this and every time we try, we're stabbed in the heart.
So now the deal is that we'll take back all the responsibility, the buck will stop with us. Clearly women, collectively, and the old, collectively, cannot manage or maintain a society. Half want complete civilizational suicide to "own the chuds" and the other half are very obviously too emotionally-inclined for rational pragmatism. Yes, that includes right-wing women. You're lovely people, but you don't fight wars.
Your rights have always come with the tacit expectation of no attached responsibilities, and you've- collectively- voted that way for generations. Case after case after case after case after case of women doing insane, irrational and self-destructive things then trying to get away with it because "i'm just a girl" or "emotions made me do it", the arguments for abortion, the entire Clancy affair. The baseline claim is, and has always been, women as a class are not capable of responsibility and the end of that road is a return to treating women as property.
In that, you have two choices. The secular lefty Feminists are choosing Islam as their escape from responsibility. A significant chunk of "right-wing" women will no doubt follow suit the second it looks safe. You'll either be one of Abdul's twelve beaten and raped wives or you side with Western civilization, Western history and the systems our ancestors lived under. Pick your side, time's running out and when we win, as we always have, the traitors won't be welcomed back.
The "Same, Lindsey" trend will actually be studied.
The female need for attention and affirmation, blended with the feminist desire for murderous rage is fascinating.
A demand for power, authority, and total autonomy independent of ethics, while demanding to be viewed as a victim without responsibility or accountability.
Toddler king. Adult child. Oppressed tyrant. Offending victim. The oxymorons are endless.
Every woman in the West has been influenced by feminism. But not just the women. So has every single man. This does not mean everyone is a feminist, but the effects of feminism have influenced all of us.
The ideas of feminism, along with its parent, Marxism, and the general ideas of the anti-West left wing intellectuals, have become the de facto primary culture in our nations. We have been officially culturally captured.
Most men and women in the West currently hold one or more feminist ideas. It is a widespread poison that has infected almost everyone to some degree. They may not hold the more pernicious and poisonous feminist ideas. They may instead only hold the ones that lead later to the more dangerous ideas.
Feminism is a left-wing idea, the core of which has been heartily embraced and normalized by the right.
For the last ten days or so, the conversation on X has been about the worst of feminism and the desire to excuse the murder of children, rooted in feminist ideas, especially the idea that women’s welfare must come before every other consideration.
Now, some people will say that only represents a tiny minority of women. Well, let us look at the statistics. Twenty-five percent of American women have killed at least one of their children through abortion. Sixty-four percent of women support abortion.
It is not a small minority. It is a majority of women. And that number is likely to keep growing unless there is major social backlash against the horror of child sacrifice.
Of course, this is not to say that there are not good women out there. There are wonderful women who reject the worst excesses of feminism. But I have found that even most anti-feminist women still have at least one feminist belief.
And I do not think it is because of maliciousness. I think it is because women naturally conform to the social narrative. And the social narrative today is feminism.
It takes a tremendous amount of resistance to completely purge yourself of those ideas. Most women simply do not have the disagreeableness necessary to say no to the dominant societal trend.
Some people will say, “But Noah, you are feeding the gender war.”
That is absolutely not true. The gender war has existed throughout history. There has always been this kind of underlying conflict, mostly between single men and women. We have tried various methods of harmonizing it. None have worked so well as marriage, especially once you have children.
If you allow it to affect you, to mature you, and to grow up in your heart, you will come to realize that cooperation with your spouse, under the leadership of the husband, for the purpose of raising children into adults, is the only way to end the gender war. It aligns men and women better than any other system.
My work, my mission, with men and women is to call them to take agency and responsibility for themselves. To become capable of self-rule or to admit their limitations and submit to righteous rule. This will, of course, rankle both the feminists on the left and the right.
One of the primary feminist tropes is that women have no agency. They are merely the victims of circumstance, society, their own biology, and the patriarchy. This idea, where women are not actors but the acted upon, is even popular on the right.
Again, feminism has infected all political ideologies. It is the most destructive tool wrought by that branch of leftism from which it spawned.
I do believe that women’s agency is different from men’s, and I have written about that extensively in the past. But if we truly believe that women have no agency, then we would treat them like animals in order to prevent them from self-destruction. They would become property and nothing more.
But if women have agency, then we need to hold them accountable to the degree to which their individual agency enables that. And we need to kill the societal idea that women as a group can never be responsible for anything that happens in their lives, that they are always victims of circumstance, or that female biology is an excuse for evil.
More importantly, we need to hack at the root of the problem, which is the massive, highly successful propaganda effort that tells women that they are victims and have no agency.
As a civilization, the West has made tremendous progress in reducing male forms of violence. In fact, we have perhaps gone too far, neutering our men.
We now need to address the problem of female violence, especially against children and through the manipulation of the court system, the authorities, and institutions of the West.
This is a problem we will tackle because it will become such a massive problem that a failure to address it will lead to the complete destruction of the West. And we will not allow that to happen.
The question remains: how do we solve this problem?
I think the policy-level changes that need to be made are for a different discussion. But at the root of all of it, we must begin to hold women accountable for their actions, hold them to the highest standard, and yes, at first that standard may well be beyond what many women can live up to.
And when you do not meet a standard, there are consequences. Those consequences are designed either to restore reciprocity or to restore the individual’s capacity to live up to the standard.
That is really what we need: a civilization-wide reawakening to the need for standards and for the social pressure to hold women to those standards.
So who can do that?
The only ones who can hold women to a high standard are men who hold themselves to a high standard and are, in turn, held to a high standard by their fellow men.
And yes, that means the patriarchy will return.
Hate speech genuinely has its origins in communism, it was pushed through the UN by the Soviet bloc and is now being imported into Australian law through our constitutional treaty powers by Labor.
Now those same communist ideas are being used to justify banning political organisations and policing nationalist opposition out of the democratic process.
So on August 30, March For Australia, or submit to communism, there is no third option. Be there. And make sure you bring everyone you can with you, while it’s still legal.
The number of unmarried young men surges to highest level in 25+ years.
Men have been under constant attack for at least that long. Is there any wonder an entire generation of men have decided not to marry?
Stop calling young men incels.
A society without men is unsustainable.
@NoticerNews As your article says, both Labor and the Liberals/Nationals support the curtailing of our rights. As such this clearly isn’t a left/right issue.
It affects all of us, and we all need to fight it.
New opinion from Ray Pistol on how Australia's "hate speech" and "hate group" laws are the result of a multigenerational communist plot to make nationalism illegal.
"March for Australia on August 30, or submit to communism, there is no third option"
https://t.co/gj9ltYoDWh
More than 5,000 penguins in Victoria, Australia, are reportedly about to become part of what officials describe as the largest wildlife vaccination project ever undertaken.
And there's one detail that should immediately make people stop and ask questions:
The report says there have been NO reported cases of bird flu among the penguins.
Yet thousands are to be captured and handled. Each bird will require TWO vaccine doses within two weeks.
And they will also be MICROCHIPPED so authorities can monitor them.
Even the Chief Veterinary Officer acknowledges that vaccination is “not a silver bullet.” Vaccination against what? None are sick!
What evidence demonstrates that the benefits of intervening in a healthy wild colony outweigh the risks of capturing, injecting, microchipping and then recapturing thousands of animals?
What safety data exists specifically for these penguins?
We are headed towards a future where men and women drift so far apart that they stop interacting with each other.
However, it’s time to accept that there is no reconciliation with the majority of these women. You can’t compromise with the evil of radical leftism, which many have grown to embrace.
On the current path, many will become part of a lost generation. Single, childless, and mentally ill.
But the worst part is that this also means a significant portion of men will be left out of relationships and family formation.
The last “lost generation” came of age around WWI and later lived through the Depression and WWII. So that should show you where we are in the civilizational cycle.
History is repeating itself again. Gen Z was born into a gilded age upheld by boomers and will likely have to witness the system they were promised to benefit from collapse due to global war, economic crisis, and the degradation of relationships.
And like the lost generation of WWI, we will be expected to clean up the mess. But this time, we will refuse to rebuild the same system that created it.
The recent craze of feminists supporting Violent women like Lindsay Clancy Is infuriating but really shouldn't surprise us Feminism has a long history of excusing female murderers it was one of their founding missions to spread the female supremacist belief that women are incapable of evil and that any evil acts a woman does must be the fault of a man somehow! ironically using extremely misogynistic idea that because Women's emotions are so much stronger they can't be responsible for their actions! Which is definitely not a the equality they claim to preach! It's the same tired trope that they've been saying forever These women are desperate overwhelmed overworked stressed and hormonal and that somehow justifies violent acts mind you she had a support group! She had a she had involved grandparents she had a loving husband working from home to try and support her She was even rich enough to hire a maid but somehow she was just an "innocent victim"?? She had the foresight to make up an excuse to get him out of the house and then she chose to violently strangle 3 children with her bare hands not a spur of the moment psychotic snap but a cold calculated premeditated crime! the most infuriating part is the women who perpetuate the myth that men actually support violent abusive murdering men despite the lack of evidence I used that as a supposed reason why supporting violent women is somehow OK because they care more about petty vengeance than protecting innocent children
https://t.co/6BUIuyj3zo