Ce n'est même pas correct.
Il aurait fallu les torturer en direct à la télévision, puis les sodomiser de force avec un glaive, puis leurs chier dessus, et enfin les tuer en les étouffant avec le sexe couper de l'autre (ils sont deux sans l'histoire).
Ceci, aurait été juste.
@callanable Just went out of a relationship with someone who was so much into all theses "knowledge".
My self esteem got destroyed in 3 month, but i finally understood the scam.
First time i consider to have been abused.
Having sex with the same person is like one tricking a champion in League of Legends
at first it's awkward
you don't know the combos
you flash for kills you didn't need to flash for
half the abilities miss because you don't know the range
then something happens around game 50
the timings start clicking
you stop thinking about what you're doing and start FEELING it
your hands move before your brain does
you know exactly what cooldowns are up without looking
you can read every micro twitch and know what's about to happen
by game 200 you've unlocked tech nobody else in the lobby can pull off
combos that look impossible on paper
movement patterns that only make sense once you've drilled them 10,000 times
you've discovered things about the champion that the wiki doesn't even know
meanwhile some guy who plays 100 different champions is wondering why he
can't get past the laning phase
he doesn't know the matchup
he doesn't know the tempo
he doesn't know what works at level 3 vs level 6 vs level 11
variety isn't depth
variety is fear of commitment
one tricks have an unfair advantage
in league
and in bed
the more games you play with the same champion
the more terrifying you become
Study the Saskio way
The reason elite chess players have lower IQs is the same reason "successful founders dropped out" is bad advice.
Once you select for the top of any field, the traits required to get there become negatively correlated. Elite chess players need both IQ and chess-specific skill. Within them, the lower-IQ players must have higher pure chess skill to compensate, or they wouldn't be elite. The correlation is mechanical. It comes from how you drew the sample.
Apply this to founder advice. Among the general population, education and outcomes correlate positively. Among elite founders, dropouts had to compensate with something else: world-class technical skill, family capital, or an exceptional network. The "missing" trait in dropout-founders forced the other traits higher. Copying the dropout move without the compensating trait does nothing.
Every refrain from a top performer follows this pattern:
"I never networked, I just built great products." Within elite founders, the ones who skipped networking had exceptional products. The constraint selected for them.
"I sleep 4 hours a night." Within elite executives, sleep trades against output. In the general population, less sleep correlates with worse cognitive performance. You're hearing the substitution pattern of survivors.
"I don't read books." A top 0.01% operator who doesn't read requires compensation somewhere: raw memory, decades of operating reps, or a network that fed them what books would have.
The chart is the cleanest version of this you'll ever see. Black dots are the full population, strong positive correlation between early and adult performance. Red dots are the elite subset. Slope near zero.
Every advice book lives in the red dots. Every "what makes top performers different" study lives in the red dots. Every Forbes profile lives in the red dots. You're learning the substitution patterns of people who already won. Their path is in the red dots. Yours lives in the black.
When someone elite tells you what made them successful, the real question is what they had to be elite at to have the option of skipping the conventional path.
Le truc chiant avec la peur, c'est que généralement tu dois faire l'opposé de ce que tu as envie de faire en réponse à la peur pour avoir le moins de chance que la peur finisse par arriver
@PowerHasheur Je comprends pas pourquoi les gens préfèrent que ça monte.
Si on est convaincu que ça ira à 1M, alors pourquoi vouloir autre chose que la baisse du prix ?