🚨 Govt Should Let Private Players Manage Cities
This is Aerocity in Delhi, Managed By GMR Group
Most Municipalities are Lazy and Corrupt
Private Companies Will Do Much Better Job
While we often praise Indira Gandhi for the 1971 war, we should certainly read the statement made in the Pakistani parliament by Asif Ali Zardari—the husband of Benazir Bhutto.
This was a time when over 90,000 Pakistani soldiers were in Indian custody, and the Pakistan Army had surrendered. The Indian Army had integrated the Tharparkar district of Sindh into India—declaring it a new district of Gujarat—and the Tricolour had been hoisted over the parliament building in Muzaffarabad.
When Zulfikar Ali Bhutto arrived to sign the Simla Agreement with Indira Gandhi, he brought his daughter, Benazir Bhutto, along with him.
Indira Gandhi placed a condition before Zulfikar Ali Bhutto: if he wanted his 93,000 soldiers back, he would have to hand over Kashmir to India. Bhutto refused, telling her that he would not give up Kashmir, nor would he sign any such agreement; he told her to keep the 93,000 soldiers herself.
Indira Gandhi had never imagined that Zulfikar Ali Bhutto was an even shrewder player than she was. He knew how to turn a military defeat at the border into a victory at the negotiating table.
Indira Gandhi found herself in a very tight spot.
Both Pupul Jayakar and Kuldip Nayar have written in their books that Indira Gandhi missed a crucial opportunity; neither she nor her advisors possessed the diplomatic acumen required to handle such a situation.
Under the Geneva Convention, if a country captures prisoners of war, it is obligated to fully uphold their dignity. That evening at the hotel, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto said to his daughter, Benazir Bhutto, "India's back has been broken in this war; we fought with great valor. We have dealt a severe blow to India's economy. India was already burdened by Bangladeshi refugees; how will it now sustain 93,000 Pakistani soldiers? And if India wants to settle these 93,000 Pakistani soldiers there, let it do so—what use would we have for such cowardly soldiers anyway? I have reduced Indira Gandhi to a pathetic state."
And in the end, Indira Gandhi was reduced to a meek, cowering figure.
Indira Gandhi handed over Kashmir to Pakistan, returned the 93,000 soldiers, and abandoned 56 of her own soldiers to die in Pakistani prisons. Furthermore, eight months later—driven by a desire for the Nobel Prize—she returned the Tharparkar district (which had been incorporated into the Indian state of Gujarat) to Pakistan, even though 98% of Tharparkar's population at the time was Hindu.
In the book he wrote after retiring, the Army Chief at the time of the Shimla Agreement stated, "We won this war on the battlefield, but politicians defeated India at the negotiating table—and that politician was Indira Gandhi."
This is the truth about the so-called 'Iron Lady'...
Most Indians believe that the person they name as nominee on their bank account will get that money when they die. That belief is wrong, and it has torn families apart.
Here is what the law actually says.
Under Indian law, a nominee is not the owner of your money. A nominee is only a trustee. That means the bank will hand the balance to the nominee after your death, but the nominee is legally required to pass it on to your legal heirs, the people entitled to inherit under succession law. Receiving the money and owning the money are two different things.
This is not a small technical point. It is settled law. The Supreme Court laid it down decades ago and reaffirmed it firmly in a judgment in 2023.
A nomination, the court said, is simply a convenience. It gives the bank a single safe person to release the funds to, so the bank is not caught between fighting relatives. It was never meant to decide who finally owns the money.
The same rule applies almost everywhere. Bank accounts, fixed deposits, shares, mutual funds and provident fund. In all of them, the nominee holds the money in trust for the legal heirs.
There is one real exception. In life insurance, the law allows certain close family nominees, a spouse, parents or children, to keep the proceeds, though even here the High Courts have not fully agreed.
There is one more thing you must know because false claims about it are spreading online. In November 2025, the rules changed to let you name up to four nominees on a bank account instead of one.
Many social media posts claimed this finally lets you pass your money directly to whoever you choose. That is not true. You can now name four nominees instead of one, but all of them still receive the money as trustees for your legal heirs. The doctrine did not change. Only the number did.
So what actually protects your family? One thing above all, a valid Will. A Will overrides a nomination. If you want a specific person to truly own what you leave behind, name them in a properly made Will, not just on a nomination form.
Nomination decides who collects your money. A Will decides who keeps it. Most families learn the difference at the worst possible time.
Follow for verified stories every Indian deserves to know.
"Why PM Modi visits countries like Slovakia? Because India is building influence in every part of Europe" - she brilliantly explains India's diplomacy 👌🏻
India is 90 times behind the US in AI investment.
India has only 8 AI data centres. China has 230.
India is losing the AI race.
Someone needs to wake India up.
That is the narrative.
You have seen it on every news channel.
Every LinkedIn expert agrees.
Every Western journal confirms it.
But what if India already knew something they didn't?
The numbers first.
Private AI investment in 2024:
USA: $109 billion
China: $9.3 billion
India: $1.2 billion
Cumulative since 2013:
USA: $471 billion
China: $119 billion
India: $11 billion
The gap is real.
The gap is documented.
But the gap is not the story.
Then why is India not chasing it?
Does India not have money?
India's forex reserves crossed $680 billion.
India is not poor.
India is not blind.
India made a choice.
Let me take you to a meeting that never made the newspapers.
Somewhere in 2021.
Before ChatGPT existed.
Before the world even knew what AGI meant.
A meeting was called inside the PMO.
The Prime Minister chaired it.
Beside him: the NSA.
Beside him: people from Financial Intelligence whose names you will never read.
They had built something quietly.
A simulation model.
Of how the world would look in 2030.
The model showed one thing clearly.
THE TRAP.
If the US and China keep pouring borrowed money into AI.
At this rate.
By 2030, they will be buried in debt.
The model was not a guess.
It was structural analysis.
GPU chips become obsolete every 12 months.
A data centre built today is a liability by next year.
The industry needs $320 billion in annual revenue just to break even on 2025 spending.
Nobody has those revenues.
Nobody is close.
OpenAI committed $1.4 trillion in infrastructure.
OpenAI earned $20 billion in 2025.
OpenAI lost $12 billion in a single quarter.
The simulation said: this ends badly.
It also said something more dangerous.
AI cannot replace the physical world.
And today?
No measurable job displacement since ChatGPT launched 33 months ago.
Humans still make things.
Factories still matter.
Supply chains still win wars.
The room understood.
What India did instead?
PLI scheme.
14 strategic sectors.
Own money.
$20 billion realized in real investment.
And India did not abandon AI.
IndiaAI Mission: Rs 10,300 crore committed.
Sovereign compute.
Indian language models.
Own terms.
Not borrowed.
Not dependent.
Not American.
Not Chinese.
THEN LOOK AT TODAY.
The bubble that simulation model predicted in 2021.
Is now a balance sheet you can read publicly.
Every civilisation that built on debt, collapsed.
Every civilisation that built on real assets, survived.
India has 5,000 years of memory on this.
India is not behind.
India is just at a pace it wants.
Not too fast.
Not too slow.
When the servers go dark in Silicon Valley.
India's factories will still have the lights on.
The question is not why India invested less in AI.
The question is: who will be laughing in 2030?
I used to have a mixed feeling for NRIs for not standing up for India more, and used to feel why Modi try too hard to mingle with them for no reason, they are not Indians anymore…
Then I came across this reel and checked if it’s actually true. Some facts:
> after sanctions we had only left with reserves only enough for our 1 month of import; 6 times lower than previous years
> SBI issue a bond on behalf of Indian govt to NRIs only
> in less than a month SBI had to withdraw that bond as it was flooded by NRI’s applications
> 18000 crore by 74000 Indians living abroad; amounting 24+ lakhs each.
> no extra ordinary interest rates, almost similar to western countries, and even way below what Indian banks were giving to domestic customers.
Maybe this incident was the reason why Modi never misses a chance to connect with NRI’s and maybe I was wrong about them; they will always be Indian in their hearts and our success story will always include them.
When an all “MAGA”, “America First”, “Americans First”guy from Frisco Texas speaks sense. A lot of it actually. Because he sure knows how economy works & sustains 🤷🏻♀️🤷🏻♀️
THIS IS INCREDIBLE INDIA - WILDLIFE
WE HAVE A DIVERSE WILDLIFE WHICH IS COEXISTING WITH US SINCE EONS DESPITE THE HARSHEST INVASIONS AND COLONIZATIONS.
India’s first Algae Tree was installed in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh in May 2026:
•Location: Swami Vivekananda Park, Bhopal
•Developer: Mushroom World Group (Made in India)
•Capacity: Cleans air as much as 25 trees
•Purpose: Pollution control in urban areas
𝐀 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐝 𝐦𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧. 🇮🇳
India’s first Made-in-India C-295 military transport aircraft has successfully completed its maiden flight. From being a major importer to innovator, India’s transformation reflects PM Modi’s determination to make #AtmanirbharBharat a reality.
Every indigenous aircraft, every defence breakthrough and every Make-in-India success is a fitting answer to those who mocked India’s self-reliance ambitions. ✈️