Edvard (Ø,G)

[Edvard (Ø,G) @ApolloCryptos]

@NAZNINAKTEfpdc Dm

[Edvard (Ø,G) @ApolloCryptos]

@n2xsol Hi

[Edvard (Ø,G) @ApolloCryptos]

@rami_hashimi Done

[Edvard (Ø,G) @ApolloCryptos]

@BitcoinPulseX @grok Me

[Edvard (Ø,G) @ApolloCryptos]

If $0G hits 1000, I will give 10 x $1000 to my followers

[Edvard (Ø,G) @ApolloCryptos]

@WLFIonSolana FbM19SQkezfFEXaNgNa66bFiEDAy4sBgp14qb8q94fhF

[Edvard (Ø,G) @ApolloCryptos]

@HiveNodeAi FbM19SQkezfFEXaNgNa66bFiEDAy4sBgp14qb8q94fhF

[Edvard (Ø,G) @ApolloCryptos]

@0G_Foundation Fairness logic – if it were a ladder, late buyers would pay more for the same node, which makes no sense if all tiers were visible simultaneously.
4/4

[Edvard (Ø,G) @ApolloCryptos]

@0G_Foundation No mention of sequential unlocking – the docs only say “segmented into 32 tiers starting at 0.05 ETH,” nothing about progression.
3/4

[Edvard (Ø,G) @ApolloCryptos]

@0G_labs @michaelh_0g @samkamani @AutowhaleNet @Ismael_H_R @lagrangedev Fairness logic – if it were a ladder, late buyers would pay more for the same node, which makes no sense if all tiers were visible simultaneously.
4/4

[Edvard (Ø,G) @ApolloCryptos]

@0G_labs @michaelh_0g @samkamani @AutowhaleNet @Ismael_H_R @lagrangedev No mention of sequential unlocking – the docs only say “segmented into 32 tiers starting at 0.05 ETH,” nothing about progression.
3/4

[Edvard (Ø,G) @ApolloCryptos]

@0G_LabsHub @0G_Foundation 3. Fairness logic – if it were a ladder, late buyers would pay more for the same node, which makes no sense if all tiers were visible simultaneously.
3/3

[Edvard (Ø,G) @ApolloCryptos]

@0G_LabsHub @0G_Foundation 2. No mention of sequential unlocking – the docs only say “segmented into 32 tiers starting at 0.05 ETH,” nothing about progression.
2/3

[Edvard (Ø,G) @ApolloCryptos]

@0G_LabsHub @0G_Foundation 1.Tiers were open in parallel – Tier 1 and Tier 7 were available at the same time. In a true ladder, higher tiers unlock only after lower ones sell out.
1/3