Extended Penortype

Anarchocapitalist Objectivist.

[Extended Penortype @Aquarya4]

@ProfVocateur @DavidG_the_real @DiedSuddenly_ If the drug causes the effect, regardless of whether that was the initial intended effect, it is still a drug "for that effect."

[Extended Penortype @Aquarya4]

@ZyMazza

[Extended Penortype @Aquarya4]

@ItIsHoeMath Actually, removing the welfare state is the only necessary and moral way to deal with the problem.

[Extended Penortype @Aquarya4]

@tracewoodgrains If someone wanted to cosplay as a police officer and kidnap you, how would you know his badge was "legitimate" in the moment?

[Extended Penortype @Aquarya4]

@BowTiedRanger Part of the problem is pervasive envy. If one village gets a well and the neighboring village does not, they will destroy the well, leaving nothing for anyone.

[Seamus (FreedomToons) @seamus_coughlin]

Dad: I worked and saved all my life. Instead of blowing through all my money before I die, I will give it to my son.

Son: Thank you, father. This will help me raise a family of my own.

Freelance Journalist Abi Wilkinson: Isn't there someone you forgot to ask?

[Extended Penortype @Aquarya4]

@wanyeburkett Obviously, the issue is that "you're legally required to be there all day."

[Extended Penortype @Aquarya4]

@mblair @elonmusk No, because the creatives can simply choose not to use the tool.

[Extended Penortype @Aquarya4]

@h1tm3cl0wn You're wrong, neither is excusable by definition. What you would call "excusable murder" likely falls under self-defense, or you're just evil.

[Extended Penortype @Aquarya4]

@jakerandall @elonmusk Dongle blumpf

[Extended Penortype @Aquarya4]

@growing_daniel Unhoused implies housed instead of homeowner, which implies someone else provides housing. They hate real individual freedom.

[Extended Penortype @Aquarya4]

My main is last stock SoPo at 80%

[PrinceDemo @PrinceDemo_]

Genuinely uninstall the game

[Extended Penortype @Aquarya4]

@khoomeik Your premise is communistic in nature. Stopping at an arbitrary point makes no sense. Just own the principle.
I, for one, want people to be in control of their will, not be forced to do whatever maximizes society's wealth.

[Extended Penortype @Aquarya4]

@peacefreak_sa @terfnurse @Tony_Gehring The bridal dress per se is enough. She would say it's antisocial for the mother or sister to wear a bridal dress too, and she'd be right.

[Extended Penortype @Aquarya4]

@avidseries @MattWalshBlog Ownership is roughly defined by who rightfully controls something, not merely who possesses it at that moment. The people in the government have no right to your things, regardless of whether or not they actually have it.

[Extended Penortype @Aquarya4]

@avgfootballnjyr @frogs4girls It's cooler that it wasn't.

[Extended Penortype @Aquarya4]

@fyrewede @elonmusk You can enter a virtual world with all your Christian buddies and be free from what bothers you about this world. Perhaps your soul will benefit from being sucked by the machine.

[Extended Penortype @Aquarya4]

@i2cjak Prompt engineer

[Extended Penortype @Aquarya4]

@vandeh_praise And there is no class of people who don't require consent to interfere with you.

[Extended Penortype @Aquarya4]

@LobsterMinion @prunetistic But if I kill him...then im as bad as him 🥺