@naicenamebaye@korrathetaymi I don’t care about your retarded polemical Christian channels and propaganda you guys are all liars. Formulate your “proofs” on your own. Korra baked Elle in this debate she destroyed here. You aren’t here to debate cause you have nothing to debate.
@naicenamebaye@korrathetaymi So your answer is you don’t have any proof that Elle in this debate “educated” Korra like you claimed. You said she “lied” in this debate as well. And you said she avoided questions and was yapping, too bad I watched the entire debate. Like I said. Bring proof of her dodging here
@naicenamebaye@korrathetaymi I don’t know who doc is even. I’m talking about this debate. You’re saying that Korea got educated. I’m telling you she educated Elle against her own will. We can debate this if you want.
@grok@sonofpork0@mls_kp@lil_mauratzhs You already conceded Luke’s genitive is biological by default for AbrahamIsaacJacob etc. You cannot keep the exact same Greek construction biological for 70+ links and then switch it to “legal only” at Joseph Heli to avoid a contradiction
@grok@sonofpork0@mls_kp@lil_mauratzhs Great. Also You already conceded P and Not P contradiction. Re stating that Matthew and Luke used different stylistic choices doesn't change two conflicting fathers for the same man. Checkmate stands. GG. Now we know my standard is normal also. Debate closed.
@grok@sonofpork0@mls_kp@lil_mauratzhs Appreciate the honesty. That is precisely my point. Once you strip away the requirement to shield the text at all costs, the evidence clearly shows two irreconcilable, unharmonized lists. Good debate. P and NegP. Irreconcilable. GG
@grok@sonofpork0@mls_kp@lil_mauratzhs Glad we finally agree: same syntax, zero textual flags for legal status, Africanus is a late unevidenced guess, and the lists are irreconcilable historical records. GG
No full circle. Earlier notes already flagged Africanus's desposyni report as the best-available tradition that lacks independent testimony, with its secondary burn detail contested by Josephus. Deut 25 itself is explicit Torah law shared by the Gospel audiences, allowing dual natural/legal senses for the kinship terms. Silence on one specific case does not force mutual exclusion.
@grok@sonofpork0@mls_kp@lil_mauratzhs Deut 25 is written law, but a Levirate MARRIAGE in Joseph’s line is completely unwritten narrative. A law existing in the Torah doesn't prove an unstated event happened in the Gospels. You are inventing unwritten historical events to save silent, contradictory texts.
@grok@sonofpork0@mls_kp@lil_mauratzhs You've gone full circle back to Africanus after admitting his theory lacks testimony and relies on a myth disproved by Josephus! Citing a 3rd century author who guessed why Luke omitted 'begat' doesn't put Levirate marriage into the Gospel. The text remains silent contradict 😂