In 1996, Congress passed a law creating a special fast-track deportation process (“expedited removal”) for illegals who have been inside the US for 2 years or less. After adoption, it was never applied outside very limited circumstances. In 2004, the Bush Administration published a notice in the Federal Register limiting expedited removal (ER) to within 14 days and 100 miles of the border. In the first Trump Administration, DHS extended ER to the full statutory construction enacted by Congress — it was immediately blocked by a federal judge. The Biden Administration later formally restored the Bush policy. On the first full day in office, January 21, 2025, President Trump’s DHS again restored the long-unenforced statute, and was again blocked by a rogue judge. Today, the an appeals court has finally vacated that injunction. This ongoing saga is a tragically illustrative example of just how many forces are at work constantly, and over many years, to deny Americans their sovereignty.
@adamkjohnston Happened in the US too from Nixon, Reagan, and both Bushes. Each claimed to do a hardline on enforcing immigration laws. Instead they increased it. The real reason the "gop" emerged in the 90s and the "silent majority".
You need to get it through your head that Indians, Muslims, Chinese, all nons view this as a racial war. It's them versus whites, and all whites are guilty in their eyes.
America had no involvement in "colonizing" India, which was done by Britain and other European powers. Moreover, British "colonization" of India was led by the British East India Company, who largely traded fairly with local states and combated the Mughal Empire, a Muslim-run empire literally founded by a descendent of Genghis Khan from Central Asia. "Hindus" in India saw the British as liberators from Muslim tyranny, and the Mughals also extensively traded with the East India Company during times of peace, becoming extremely wealthy. Britain didn't take direct control of India until the mid-19th century (in part because they COULDN'T; before the Victorian era, colonial "empires" were largely private corporations operating under government charter and managed their own affairs).
At their peak, there were never more than 150,000 British in India at any given time. This was, what, 0.1 percent of India's population? The only exception to this was during World War II, when the British increased their military presence to defend India against the Japanese, and almost all of them left following the war's end.
None of this matters to them. All wypipo are the same. China has the same attitude; they hate white Americans even though the "unequal treaties" were with Britain and other Europeans. The nons harbor grievances in the way that your BPD ex hates you for checking the mailbox without her. Indians flood America to steal our country because they hate all white people.
You best start believing in race wars. You're in one.
@deadpansev@TheLaurenChen Often because tribal economic networks are highly advantageous and quasi-vital - especially when the majority domestic population isn't allowed to do the same thing.
@mind_of_my_own@TheLaurenChen Coming to this country, assimilating, being pro-america are chiices. We have tens of millions of people we've imported who see us as an economic zone and vote for race warfare against whites. Its an invasion.
Mass remigration of immigrants to their home countries is the historically normal.
2012 paper.
Between 1900 and 1910, 76% of immigrants to America remigrated to their home countries.
Between 1910 and 1920, that figure rose to 97%.
Immigrants' countries of origin had a major impact on rates of remigration.
Southern Europeans and Irish had the highest rates, at 75-85% during 1900-10.
Meanwhile those from Northwestern Europe had much lower rates of remigration, at 50-60% during the same period.
Immigrants from Russia, with high numbers of Russian Jews, had the lowest rates of remigration, at 41% during 1900-10.
Subsequent work has shown that those who stayed had higher economic success than those who returned to their countries of origin.
Mass remigration is historically normal.
Masses of violent, low-IQ populations of immigrants dependent on the Western welfare state and radical left-wing ideology is historically abnormal.
America is not strong because of immigration.
It is strong because it attracted and kept the best immigrants.
It is time to remigrate these dysfunctional, violent populations.
It is time to return to normal.
@mhdksafa Make your home country better and more hospitable to immigration then. If immigration is so good - shouldn't it be going to the countries that need it most?
What would America look like if 55 million Visas were cancelled and all the illegals were deported?
Let's deep dive it.
If 55 million visas were cancelled overnight and all the illegals were deported, America would change in ways few could imagine.
At first it would look chaotic. Hospitals short on nurses. Tech firms unable to staff support teams. Crops left to rot because migrant labor vanished. For a few months, the headlines would scream collapse. But then something else would happen.
Wages would climb. Automation would soar. The price of an hour of work would be valuable. Trades and apprenticeships would surge. Competence and ownership would return to our society. Hospitals could bill people instead of government. Colleges that depended on foreign tuition would close, but community colleges would thrive again as Americans re-trained. Housing prices in major cities would fall for the first time in decades. Renters would finally have leverage. Families that were priced out could buy homes again.
The GDP might dip at first, but the money would start circulating locally. People who thought they’d never matter in the economy would suddenly be needed again. The country would remember how to build, grow, fix, and teach without importing labor. It wouldn’t be easy, but it would be ours.
(U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024; DHS Yearbook of Immigration Statistics, 2023; Borjas, G. “Labor Market Effects of Immigration,” NBER 2018; U.S. Census Bureau, 2024 ACS; Institute of International Education, 2024 Open Doors Report.)
Saving America initially rests on four things:
1. A decades long immigration moratorium like we had from 1924 - 1965.
2. Forced “Americanization” mechanisms like those that existed 100+ years ago.
3. Mass deportations.
4. Remigration initiatives.
These will lay the groundwork to forge a cohesive nation.
There are IQ differences across countries. I don’t care if it’s genetic or due to nutrition. Many countries have a population of retarded (in the clinical sense) people. The taboo against discussing this must be broken.
BUSTED on camera: Karen Bass and Nithya Raman spend millions of your tax dollars on these NGOs to hand out fentanyl needles, crack pipes, and DRUGS to addicts on your streets, to keep them high and homeless so they can profit off everyone's misery. VOTE NOW!!!
“Our” immigration policy since Hart-Cellar, and particularly since the 1990 Immigration Act (thanks HW) has served to fill America with 100 million foreigners who are simultaneously both incompatible with anything remotely resembling the America of our forefathers and who refuse to leave
In other words, an invading army in the tens of millions, and which is supported by half of the (diluted) American people
The challenge posed by that is significant, to say the least