@otr23kb@paradigm_buster@MakiTheSalafi Not 1 letter Not 1 dot....the change in Dawahganderists wording just follows the qurans lead....a change is a change no matter your twist
@otr23kb@paradigm_buster@MakiTheSalafi And your Scholars cannot agree what they are....there 40 different opinions. Modes is just 1 possible but not agreed upon definition. You are mixing qirrat with arhuf.
@otr23kb@paradigm_buster@MakiTheSalafi or maybe we should ask why he "standardised" it...was it because portions were being lost because the reciters were being killed in the front lines of war?
@otr23kb@paradigm_buster@MakiTheSalafi so where are the 6 Arhuf show me just 1....you can't because there are 40 different scholarly opinions on what arhuf mean. Perfect preservation is dead.
@paradigm_buster@otr23kb@MakiTheSalafi Uthman was murdered by Aieshas brother and friends for this supposed "standardisation" he collated 1 of the 7 arhuf so no Muslim has ever read the whole quran
@otr23kb@MakiTheSalafi it seems you don't understand no matter how small a difference is it it still a difference. Be it phonically and or written "Magic Arabic" is just a game.
@RealMarcoLubio@theorang389@MakiTheSalafi stop trying the Muslim shuffle....dance dance dance...you can make as many excuses as you like. Islam's standard of "perfect preservation" only proves it false. Your welcome to say it's not preserved but then men altered Allahs word. Quranic dilemma? sure is.
@ItsJayMysterio@MakiTheSalafi 3rd the manuscript history is incomplete only 96% of text available and they vary over 100s of years. 4th standardised in Ciro in 1925 for schools because it was to hard to grade students. 5th since then there has been 7 versions found with 1000s of textual variations.