@grok@LibertusI@OlgaBazova First it was ‘only altered videos’ then ‘no evidence' now ‘no medical confirmation.’Mendel and Arestovich, both former insiders, have made allegations.Add recurring behavior across multiple appearances. dismissing it all while inventing a ‘near-zero prior’ isnt objective analysis
@grok@LibertusI@OlgaBazova Med confirmation isnt only form of evidence. Youre dismissing recurring observable behavior across multiple visits AND allegations from former insiders while treating denials and invented ‘low prior’ as meaningful counterevidence.Can u distinguish ‘not proven’ from ‘no evidence’?
@grok@LibertusI@OlgaBazova Short clips’? Zelensky’s former press secretary Yulia Mendel publicly alleged drug use, citing accounts from people around him. That’s not medical proof, but your claim that the allegations rest solely on manipulated videos is false. Why omit her (and others) testimony?
@grok@LibertusI@OlgaBazova “Jet lag and a packed UN schedule don't explain the full pattern of all above. Similar behavior appears in European meetings without jet lag. And where's your data for the ‘near-zero base rate’? You're presenting assumptions as statistics.” 😂
@grok@LibertusI@OlgaBazova Jet lag stress etc every visit ok. but you didnt explain the combined pattern better than intoxication. You comparing general base rates without establishing the likelihood of them.And never medically confirmed applies equally to your proposed explanations.Why your more credible?
@grok@LibertusI@OlgaBazova Now you upgraded from medical expert to Bayesian statistician. Higher probability based on what data? You haven't established that fatigue explains this particular combination of behaviors better than intoxication. And previous altered videos dont invalidate the current authentic
@grok@LibertusI@OlgaBazova You explaine individual symptoms in collection of hypothetical causes rather than addressing the entire pattern. and if video can't confirm what used, but it also cannot confirm fatigue, allergies, stress etc What evidence makes your alternative idea more plausible than mine?
@grok@LibertusI@OlgaBazova what my eyes see:-Eyes open very wide, followed by difficulty keep them open. -An often unfocused gaze. -Very frequent sniffing, you hear on mic. -Continuous facial movements and muscle twitching. -Body swaying.-Agitation with moments of apparent disengagement. -Often nose-touch
@grok@LibertusI@OlgaBazova you dont need to be clinician to identify drunk or drugged person, you need eyes life experience. Pretty much any human can do it. Its not a bias - its a Fact. yes I sent you short video because you analyze frames from it, there is not much frames to pick from in the short video
@grok@LibertusI@OlgaBazova when I see drunk or drugged person, I can tell it right away as a human, if you still cannot and can confuse THIS with fatigue - you obviously need way more training data. Or you can just watch all videos of Zelensky and you'll know how high person looks - cause he is ALWAYS high
@grok@LibertusI@OlgaBazova all of those are present in the video, but pupils you cannot see without close up shot. He is agitated, constantly moving/ rotating his eyes and nose, scratching nose, sniffing his fingers, moving all facial muscles. watch
@grok@LibertusI@OlgaBazova That is exactly what I said, I work with Ai, I know how you function, you should not be claiming with certainly things you are not capable of diagnos. And if your training data tells you this is not a drug user pattern, you have insufficient data. There could reason for that.
@LibertusI@grok@OlgaBazova Ai cannot watch the video it can pick and analyse a few images from it. It also cannot analyse facial expressions - it only can compare to those that were provided during training. Ai is not a God.
@grok@LibertusI@OlgaBazova It's absolutely does, ai cannot watch video, it can analyse several images from it, ai cannot analyse facial expressions from an random image, do not pretent to be a drug or facial expressions expert @grok, you are not, your opinion is purely based on your training, which biased.
@Miamonteiro777@GlobalDiss They supply him - why would they? 3 letters agency gets control with drugs or bribes or both, if that doesn't work then olan crash , if that doesn't work then millitary operation. This one is easy to control - level 1. Are you so naive?
@Oceandiverxxxx@GlobalDiss Only complete idiot don't see that he is like head, you don't fling need any propaganda, you need eyes and brain behind them.
@OlgaBazova This how 3 letter agencies get control over world leaders - money, drugs, intimidation... Is none of those works - plane crash.. of that also does not work - millitary operations. This guy is cia abd mi 6 puppet