I went to my daughter's school for a parent meeting.
The teacher shook my hand and said, "You are an amazing father."
I said, "No no no no no."
Five nos. I counted later.
She smiled and said, "Really. She talks about you every day."
I said, "No, she is amazing. Not me. I am nothing. I am just a father. Please. No."
I was sweating. In America. In November. In a classroom.
The teacher looked at me the way you look at a dog who is scared of a vacuum cleaner.
She said, "Okay… well… she's doing great."
I said, "Thank you. Sorry. Thank you. Sorry."
I bowed. In a chair. To an American woman. Who was already looking at her next parent.
In the car, my daughter buckled her seatbelt and said,
"Papa. Why did you say no five times?"
I opened my mouth.
Nothing came out.
Because the real answer was:
In Japan, when someone praises you, you must push it away. If you accept it, you are arrogant. If you deny it once, you are humble. If you deny it five times, you are a good Japanese man.
My father denied every compliment for 70 years.
His father denied every compliment for 80 years.
I was raised by a line of men who could not say thank you.
I looked at my daughter in the rearview mirror.
She was 7. She was waiting.
I said,
"Because Papa is stupid. From today, Papa will say thank you."
She said, "Okay!" and went back to her iPad.
Like it was nothing.
Like changing 300 years of samurai DNA takes 4 seconds when your daughter asks.
That night I called my father.
I said, "Otousan. You were an amazing father."
He said, "No no no no no."
I said, "Yes. Five times yes. I am your son. I know."
He was quiet for a long time.
Then he said, "…arigatou na."
First time in 40 years.
My daughter taught me in the car.
I taught my father on the phone.
America just held the door open.
The grabblers had to kill Charlie Kirk. He was a genius and a pure soul who wasn’t gonna be bought. The more I look into him the more he was right about all these high level things. His stance on gremlin country (Israel) is why he was given so much fame and money but that was changing.
Without the absurd patsy narrative everyone can see what they did to them. And it doesn’t make people cowards it gives them strength. They will absolutely do that to you, your kids, your parents, your neighbors. For what? Being honest? Trying hard?
Anyone of any substance doesn’t become afraid when they see a good man slaughtered by cowards. They get focused and they know to never give a single inch to these people.
Money is not wealth. Fame is not wealth. And now we all can see that
Tim Dillon: "MAHA was all fake. RFK is fighting a yak on Instagram. This was the guy who was going to look into the vaccines and the food. He didn’t do any of that. He’s doing content. That’s what our country has become."
Unreal. Just ONE republican voted against the NDAA. Massie, of course. The guy who AIPAC and Adelson spent tens of millions removing from office.
Well, I guess that makes it easy. We now know that every single Republican is a traitor. Absolutely disgusting.
October is 3 years since Israel pulled that false flag and this all started. I wouldn’t be surprised if it escalates or there is some other false flag. I do not think we are headed for martial law and total collapse and just chaos. It’s gonna be just like it is now, just with peoples emotions going crazy. Don’t feed into it
Remember they are staging the fulfillment of prophetic events (according to poor and false interpretations) in order to lead people astray.
Prophecy cannot be faked, but people’s understanding of it can be warped, and then that can be faked with the same result. Deceived people accepting a false kingdom
The 2033 thing is so obvious that it can’t be true, And the last time people thought the end was around the corner it was the great disappointment in 1832 and we got Jehovah witness and seventh day Adventists out of that.
They did all the same things, calculated dates, placed current events in prophecy and were led astray, a few years later papal infallibility and codification of Marian doctrines…
The falling away is here, don’t fall with them. Come out of the churches.
Thomas Massie issues one last warning to Americans about the dangers of Section 219, which would permanently merge the United States and Israeli military supply chains and outlast any presidency.
This would permanently integrate the U.S. military supply chains with Israel's.
"We don't have this kind of bilateral agreement with any other country."
"This project will have a lifespan that outlasts the commander in chief, regardless of who the next president is."
Saying you’re worried about China interfering in our elections after you got paid over $300 million by an Israeli family is pretty hilarious. Israel has interfered in our politics more than all other countries combined.
This is why I tell the truth out loud as rudely and as often as possible.
People say I'm hateful.
Yeah. Yup.
I hate being told to live a lie.
Join me in calling out all the lies you can find in the rudest and truest possible way, or you're kind of a fag to be honest
Case closed! Tyler Robinson was the lone shooter. The evidence is overwhelming. Move along!
Why do so many social media influencers want this case closed? They claim the evidence presented during the preliminary hearing was “crystal clear,” “damning,” and “conclusive.”
They are either seeing what they want to see, or they are lying.
I’ve been thoroughly investigating the Charlie Kirk assassination since the day it happened. This is the first time I’ve said anything publicly about the case. I couldn’t care less about being the first to break a story or about the clicks and cash that come with it. I care about accuracy. My track record speaks for itself.
What’s happening on social media right now is identical to what happened during COVID. Anyone who dared to seek information about the safety and efficacy of an experimental mRNA injection was labeled a science denier and shamed into solitude.
Ask questions about the public assassination of Charlie Kirk and you’re “crazy,” “a grifter,” or “a Candace cult member.”
To conclude that Tyler Robinson acted alone requires setting aside a number of glaring details that, at a minimum, warrant further scrutiny. These are just a few:
THE OTHER GUNMAN
An eyewitness videotaped an individual on the roof of the Losee Center, dressed in all-black tactical gear, including a face mask and helmet. This witness reported seeing what appeared to be a smaller/shorter rifle than the one later associated with the case.
He stated that he observed the individual run across the roof, set up, and take the shot at 12:23 p.m. The weapon he saw appeared to be a smaller rifle than what authorities later highlighted. He noted the sound as a “sharp crack,” not a big hunting rifle boom. The witness reported these details to authorities, but to date no one has followed up.
DISPATCH AUDIO
911 audio was broadcast shortly after the shooting. Dispatch relayed the suspect description to officers: “He’s on top of the building on the far north side, just east of the library… He’s going to be wearing all black, black long gun, black tactical helmet, a black mask, possibly wearing a tactical vest and jeans.”
DESTRUCTION OF THE CRIME SCENE
The lawn where Charlie Kirk was shot was paved over just four days later. The crime scene was excavated and covered with concrete on a Sunday. Dan Merrell was hired to pave the area. When he arrived at the scene, approximately 10 inches of topsoil had already been removed. Merrell stated on camera that someone coordinating the work told him, “The governor and the FBI said they want this done by Monday.”
DNA DISCREPANCIES
Forensic testimony indicated that DNA recovered from the towel wrapped around the rifle belonged to two individuals. One profile was identified as Robinson’s roommate, Lance Twiggs, while Robinson was identified only as a possible contributor to DNA found on the towel and on a screwdriver recovered from the rooftop. ATF forensic biologist Kaitlyn Oliver testified that Tyler Robinson’s DNA sample was “the most degraded.” What this could mean is that Lance Twiggs was the last to touch the rifle.
INCONCLUSIVE FRAGMENTS
During the preliminary hearing, ATF examiner Samantha Karner testified about a bullet jacket fragment pulled from Kirk’s autopsy compared against test-fires from the Mauser bolt-action rifle. Her analysis concluded the fragment “could not be identified or excluded” as having been fired from the rifle, with the report stating “the result of the comparison was inconclusive.” She testified she was “unable to say one way or another” due to a lack of microscopic marks on the bullet jacket fragment.
THE UNFIRED BULLET
During cross-examination, the defense asked investigator David Hull about a bullet found on a rooftop other than the rooftop where Robinson is alleged to have fired the fatal shot. Hull said he “believed” there was an unfired bullet found on another building, not the Losee Center. He said the area wasn’t treated as part of the crime scene because the bullet “was accounted for as an ejected cartridge from an officer who had cycled his rifle.” When pressed on specifics, Hull said he could not identify the building, could not recall the type of round, didn’t know when it was found, and didn’t know where it currently was.
ENHANCED SURVEILLANCE VIDEO
Judge Graf agreed to play an “enhanced” UVU surveillance video showing the person alleged to be Robinson on the rooftop—but ruled it would be shown only to people physically present in the courtroom.
As if following a script, conservative influencers who were in the courtroom that day echoed the same talking points. They claimed that the footage was clear, high-definition proof showing Robinson taking the shot—framing it as “undeniable.” However, others who were in the courtroom strongly refute these claims.
Brandi Siciliani posted on X “I was in the courtroom today. There is no high-quality, zoomed-in footage showing anyone taking a shot. The video shown is the same distance as the footage of ‘Tyler’ jumping off the roof… I have no idea why people are claiming otherwise. They know the video isn’t going to be released publicly, so they’re misrepresenting what was actually shown in court.”
As a filmmaker, I know a thing or two about video technology. 4K resolution alone doesn’t overcome the physics of distance and digital zoom. 4K refers to the sensor/output resolution (roughly 3840×2160 pixels), not how much detail exists on a subject 100+ yards away. If the subject occupies a tiny fraction of the frame, you only have a small number of actual pixels covering that person. Zooming in digitally (enlarging in post-production) doesn’t add resolution—it just makes the existing pixels bigger. It can improve visibility of shapes and colors, but it doesn’t recover facial detail or other identifying features that weren’t resolved at capture.
Not even AI can be trusted to upscale pixelated video. Enhancing a blurry face with AI can produce a coherent, convincing face that doesn’t match the actual person—because the model is filling gaps with statistically likely features, not real ones.
And… exhale.
These are just a few of the outstanding details that, in my opinion, should warrant deeper investigation into the murder of Charlie Kirk.
What you’re witnessing is a psychological operation cunningly deployed to further divide us and stop us from asking questions.
Beware of anyone pushing to close this case prematurely. We must never allow politics to thwart the pursuit of truth and justice.
This case holds the power to kill critical thinking or pull back the curtain to reveal the inner workings of “fifth generation warfare.” Which way it goes is entirely up to us, the people.
“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”
Mikki Willis
Investigative Filmmaker
Per my local police department, Flock charges approximately $3000/year per camera.
So American taxpayers are spending $349,671,000 per year to be constantly monitored. Most Americans are unaware this is happening.
@therealDeFlock
@jordanbpeterson We’ve been told this man is basically on his death bed but gratefully he summoned the strength and energy to lecture us Christians about how we need to worship Jews.
So much noise online regarding the term "judeo-Christian." Guys -- in academia it's simply the term that describes the combined corpus of Old and New Testaments. The Jewish heritage of the Hebrew scriptures combined with the New Testament. That's it. I know you want there to be some conspiracy but there isnt, that's the way we're using it. It has nothing to do with geo-politics or a one world order.