@KmrdKuebelwagen@88_jkk@ZoomerHistorian@NickBuckleyMBE@Steve_Laws_@BBCWalesNews "The more [overlap / shared British genes / genetic similarity to the British founding population] there is, the more [Britishness / Englishness / British genetic ancestry / retention of the British genome] is retained in mixed offspring."
Grok thinks it's that.
@AScorpupine@88_jkk@ZoomerHistorian@NickBuckleyMBE@Steve_Laws_@BBCWalesNews Being English requires Anglo-Saxon heritage and being less Anglo-Saxon makes you less English according to you.
Procreating with a Dutch partner retains more Anglo-Saxon heritage and therefore leads to a more English child than procreation with a Chinese partner.
Stay consistent.
@KmrdKuebelwagen@88_jkk@ZoomerHistorian@NickBuckleyMBE@Steve_Laws_@BBCWalesNews The more Anglo-Saxon heritage there is, the more Englishness is retained in mixed offspring.
So when a Dutch person has a baby with a German person, more Englishness is retained than if they had one with a Chinese.
Still got the same leap.
There are ~7.3 million Asians in Britain costing the exchequer £4,135 each, annually.
In the next 50 years the British will spend ~£1.51 trillion to sustain this 'community'.
Deporting the 2.5 million without citizenship would save £528 billion.
Giving the 4.75 million with citizenship £60,000 to renounce their British passport and leave would save £697 billion.
Mass deportations & remigration is the fiscally responsible path.
@KmrdKuebelwagen@88_jkk@ZoomerHistorian@NickBuckleyMBE@Steve_Laws_@BBCWalesNews Tell me when I said it wasn't? You asked two different questions and got 2 different answers. The English have Anglo-Saxon heritage, but having Anglo-Saxon heritage doesn't make you English. Simple.
Fill in the X and Y for me then, be completely unambiguous. Stop hiding.
@KmrdKuebelwagen@88_jkk@ZoomerHistorian@NickBuckleyMBE@Steve_Laws_@BBCWalesNews Obviously not. How could that come about?
"The more Anglo-Saxon there is the more English is retained in mixed offspring" is your argument. X and Y should both be Anglo-Saxon though, otherwise a fully Dutch person would be part English.
I don't see how you don't understand.
@KmrdKuebelwagen@88_jkk@ZoomerHistorian@NickBuckleyMBE@Steve_Laws_@BBCWalesNews It's not all that relevant. English people have varying levels, so do Dutch people. What can you determine by that alone?
Tell me exactly how it's relevant in a way that makes them more English, but doesn't make the Dutch English at all. This is what you keep dancing around.
@KmrdKuebelwagen@88_jkk@ZoomerHistorian@NickBuckleyMBE@Steve_Laws_@BBCWalesNews > the English
As in the group. Now you're trying to pretend you were talking about individuals? And you're the one tying Anglo-Saxon heritage to Englishness, remember?
You ignored my point of how unworkable it was:
https://t.co/NaADb7HOj2
@KmrdKuebelwagen@88_jkk@ZoomerHistorian@NickBuckleyMBE@Steve_Laws_@BBCWalesNews It's just axiomatically true that if you change something it's changed.
If you're measuring Englishness in terms of Anglo-Saxon heritage, you're going to have varying degrees of Englishness within the English themselves, and you'll have the Dutch as part English again.
@KmrdKuebelwagen@88_jkk@ZoomerHistorian@NickBuckleyMBE@Steve_Laws_@BBCWalesNews > Would the English be less English if the Anglo-Saxon heritage were erased or lessened?
You don't even understand your own question. If it were changed to be more Anglo-Saxon it'd be less English too. Any change to something's state makes it less like the original state.
@KmrdKuebelwagen@88_jkk@ZoomerHistorian@NickBuckleyMBE@Steve_Laws_@BBCWalesNews Less Anglo-Saxon heritage makes them less Anglo-Saxon, not less English. More would make them more Anglo-Saxon, not more English. A kid with someone who was half Angle and half Saxon would still result in a half English kid. The English are a separate group, further down stream.