@breakingbaht@AOC So you’re saying, essentially, that if AOC keeps exercising her right to freedom of speech she’s guaranteeing she’ll be targeted for violence?
You really can’t see how saying “I think this person’s views were awful but they shouldn’t have been killed” isn’t advocating violence??
@Wall_St_Custo@Google Probably should look up the definition of “assassination” and then think about what has been confirmed before going into meltdown.
@Prominent_Bryan The wider point here being that it’ll be hard to characterize his political coverage as at least moderately unbiased.
For example, I doubt you’d find similar donations from Rosie Barton or Chantal Hebert.
@IanJaeger29 Weird that you’re saying that given that the President when Trump was banned from Twitter was uh…Trump? And the people who banned him from Twitter were…not a political party? Weird.
@thatsKAIZEN He didn’t say that the shooter was MAGA. He said that MAGA supporters have been trying to say the shooter was anything else, before we had or have any evidence about the shooter’s political opinions.
There’s plenty of evidence to suggest the bullet inscriptions are memes…
@GrahamG22047543@GhitaVee@RobynUrback It’s not name-calling if it’s true, though. That statement is true. White nationalists tend to have a lot of ideological crossover with Nazis.
Ghita didn’t say anyone she disagreed with was any of these things here. You’re also now doing what you’re accusing others of doing…
@RealMadeInUSA@singwithCB@peterjhasson You think saying that many conservative voices don’t like to engage critically when there are, in fact, plenty of examples of such, is overly generalized?
I guess you’re entitled to your opinion.
But hey, you made it into a “what about” argument because, of course you did.
@RealMadeInUSA@singwithCB@peterjhasson Nah bud, I’m good. I’ve seen the level of your debating prowess, and I’m good thanks.
(I’ll leave it to you to figure out the intended tone here…)
@RealMadeInUSA@singwithCB@peterjhasson If I’m honest, I really have zero interest in debating any of this with you because you certainly aren’t doing so in good faith. It’s interesting you’re ducking the primary responses though.
And hey, look at you go. What a gaff that is by me lol, your write 😉😂
@RealMadeInUSA@singwithCB@peterjhasson Just going to point out that there’s three responses there from me. The only one you chose to engage with was the one you say is totally irrelevant…🤷♂️🤦♂️
Kind of hard to take you seriously here, honestly.
@RealMadeInUSA@singwithCB@peterjhasson Oh bud, I’m not saying you’re an idiot because you misused “your”, I’m saying it’s extremely funny that someone telling others how stupid they are made a pretty simple grammatical error.
For all the phil stuff, you seem to have forgotten a pretty important rule from debate 101
@RealMadeInUSA@singwithCB@peterjhasson Deflection from your argument? Lol sorry, I must have missed the actual argument. I think you just repeated what I said originally then made a bigger, more nebulous claim. Not really an argument with my original comment, but go off king.
@RealMadeInUSA@singwithCB@peterjhasson Yeah, you got me I’m 12…also I know tone gets lost on here sometimes so please continue assuming I’m not being sarcastic in any way…
Serious question though, are you chat gpt-ing these tweets? Feels pretty AI-esque.
@RealMadeInUSA@singwithCB@peterjhasson Nah, I actually disagree. I think the density on display here IS incredibly impressive. I would wager we also will disagree on who is displaying the aforementioned “density”…
Throwing out big words after using the wrong “your” a tweet earlier is really something. Bravo, champ!
@RealMadeInUSA@singwithCB@peterjhasson By the way, you’re critiquing my reading comprehension while misrepresenting what I’ve said…oh…WOW.
And finally, the crème de la creme, cherry on top, “really?��� moment of this exchange…
*your (not you’re…maybe don’t throw stones from a glass house 😂🤦♂️)