One of the fundamental aspects of policing that most officers seem to misunderstand is that you have to investigate FIRST and detain SECOND.
Establishing reasonable suspicion is PRELIMINARY to a detention. Officers must gather an objective and articulable set of facts that would justify a detention BEFORE they can effectuate a detention.
Share this message with an uninformed police department.
@blackopps12Matt@JustJenRX If this is how you were trained then it says a lot about the state of police training. You’re supposed to use the least amount of force necessary to subdue an individual. That’s kind of the whole point of the use of force continuum/matrix.
@Saikno4@realDonaldTrump I think you’re projecting man. I said if you support Trump you are supporting authoritarian policing. I didn’t make any comment on the character of Trump supporters. This is like trying to say it was possible to support Hitler but not the Holocaust.
This is what federal enforcement looks like under Trump. He has given them as much leeway to commit misconduct as any president possibly could. If you support @realDonaldTrump you are supporting authoritarian policing.
New video: point of view of the Key West resident locked up by @CBP agent he was filming. 8 hours later, the resident was released without being charged.
Exclusive interview with Dan Mathers about his detainment. https://t.co/jMIyR6JoAS
How is this hating on anyone? If you want to support authoritarian policing that’s on you. And I’m not denying that it has been an issue before Trump, but he has actively contributed to authoritarian policing throughout his presidencies. Look at my other replies. Go read the executive orders. You can’t say this about every candidate even remotely to the degree that this applies to Trump.
@1st_A_Media@realDonaldTrump That’s a totally fair perspective in my opinion. I’m not a fan of Trump. I think pretty much all modern presidents have been both literally and morally corrupt. The entire political structure is just completely fucked.
Im giving you undeniable evidence of ways he has directly contributed to law enforcement officers abusing their authority and you refuse to look at it. You are choosing to be ignorant on the subject and blindly defending your position. Read the evidence I provided and then make an argument.
This is a federal agent with no body cam arresting a citizen for a constitutionally protected right. You don’t see the Trump connection? Look up EO 13768, EO 13776, EO 13809, EO 14288, and theres plenty more. Or how about you just listen to what he has said at many of the pro police rallies he has done? Sure, it’s been happening before Trump, but to deny that he has directly played a role in it is literally insane.
@robification@realDonaldTrump This is an objective fact not a political opinion. Trump supports authoritarian policing. He has made this very clear. I have plenty of criticisms about the Biden administration as well.
@Incelrespeckter Yes I agree with the fighting words doctrine, but I don’t agree with police officers using it as an excuse to violate constitutional rights.
@AnthonyVattima The First Amendment doesn’t apply to private companies. If you get fired for being racist that’s just you facing the social consequences of your speech. Not sure how your analogy is relevant.