For the people that were asking how to scale, these are the propfirms to get. ๐
20x Apex 50K PAs
5x Lucid 50K Flex
5x FundedNext Futures Bolt
5x Elite Futures 50Ks
5x TPT 50Ks
5x Alpha 50K Premium
5x Tradeify select 50Ks
5x Goat Futures 50K (evals)
4x E8 50K Signature
Ninjatrader Personal Broker
People think trading takes more screen time. It takes less.
You don't need more trades. You need more capital working behind the same plan.
>take 2hrs
>print out the workbook
>fill it out
>read it every day (first thing in the morning)
>update it each quarter with your new vision (goals and ideas)
>read it with intention (not just to get it done..)
a simple and efficient way to update your mental models
YOU NEED TO READ THIS IF YOU TRACE PROP FIRMS:
Your 70% win rate prop account is still mathematically doomed.
Not because your strategy is bad. Because of a 100-year-old math problem called Gamblerโs Ruin.
Let me explain, because this is the single most expensive thing traders donโt understand.
Gamblerโs Ruin is a proven mathematical result: when a player with a LIMITED bankroll plays against an opponent with an UNLIMITED one, the limited player will eventually go broke if they bet too large a fraction of their bankroll even when the odds favor them.
Even with an edge, you can be mathematically guaranteed to blow up. The edge isnโt the problem.
The bet size is.
Now map it to your funded account:
You are the limited player. Your bankroll isnโt your $50K account itโs your $2K trailing drawdown.
The market is the unlimited player. It can stay irrational, choppy, and stop-hunty longer than your drawdown can survive.
Hereโs where the 70% win rate lies to you. At 1:1 risk-reward, risking $100 a trade, your expectancy is +$40 per trade. Positive. Profitable. On paper, a money printer.
But expectancy is an AVERAGE over thousands of trades. Your drawdown doesnโt experience the average. It experiences the SEQUENCE. And sequences contain losing streaks guaranteed.
At a 30% loss rate, a 4-loss streak feels impossible. Itโs not. Over 200 trades, thereโs roughly an 80% chance it happens to you at least once. A 5-loss streak? About 38%. Nothing to do with bad luck. Theyโre scheduled appearances.
So the only question that matters is: how many consecutive losses can your drawdown absorb?
$2K trailing DD risking $100/trade = 20 losses of room. The streak hits, you survive, your edge keeps working.
Same account risking $500/trade = 4 losses of room. The streak hits, youโre done. Same strategy. Same 70% win rate. Dead account.
And prop firms add a twist Bernoulli never imagined: the TRAILING drawdown. Every dollar you make, the floor rises with you. Your buffer never grows. Youโre permanently playing with the same short stack no matter how much you win(varies with some firms)
The brutal conclusion: most traders donโt fail because their strategy stops working. They fail because they sized their bets for their account balance instead of their drawdown, and then a completely normal, statistically inevitable losing streak showed up on schedule.
The fix is one rule: your drawdown divided by your risk per trade should be 15-20 minimum On a $2K DD, thatโs $100-130 risk. One or two micros.
I wonโt lie - Iโm not this tight with risk, but this is where the math leads
Boring.
Gamblerโs Ruin doesnโt kill boring traders. It only kills the ones who never ran the math.
going to leave this here.
this is coming from a someone who is recognized as the most decorated freestyle skier in Olympic history, successful luxury fashion model, full-time undergraduate student at Stanford University.
Most traders are trying to turn $500 into $50,000.
The smart ones do this:
Save $1,000.
- Buy prop firm evaluations.
- Pass a few.
- Get funded.
- Risk less.
- Make 2โ4% per month.
A 3% month on $400K funded capital is $12,000.
The goal was never to trade bigger.
The goal was to get access to bigger capital.
No school is going to teach you this.
Stop being retarded, start Retardmaxing
Being retarded means youโre ruminating and overthinking your decision
Retardmaxing means youโre making decisions based on your gut instinct โ zero rumination, zero regrets
Stop being retarded, start #Retardmaxing
Let me reveal a secret to you.
The real difference between you and that mentor/trader making $100k+ payouts isnโt strategy. I know some of you think it is.
Itโs not knowledge either. Some of you are more intelligent and know more than the people you see making consistent payouts.
Itโs not connections. Yes, connections help, but thatโs not the secret.
The real secret is their nervous system.
Being calm is a competitive advantage. Panic leads to expensive decisions that always end in regret.
When youโre in a trade and see a loss, you panic. You close early, re-enter, switch bias, start hoping, and even move your stop loss.
The elite trader does the opposite.
They trust their analysis. They donโt panic. They have a stop loss for a reason, and they let their trade play out without interfering.
Their edge is calm under chaos.
If you want to join their ranks, you have to train yourself to stay calm and rational no matter the situation.
Stay grounded.
If you're not financially rich, you're not as smart as you think you are.
I don't say that to be harsh. I say it because I had to hear it myself.
You can be the smartest person in the room and still be broke. Because smart doesn't build wealth.
Discipline does.
Consistency does.
Delayed gratification does.
Start there.
MIT trained cognitive scientist Donald Hoffman says "embodied consciousness like ours has a probability of zero". This is a new finding discovered just weeks ago. The normal state of consciousness is not embodied. Hoffman frames the human condition as the worst possible interface. "We're like a marathon runner with weights, terrible shoes, and a backpack." We can't move a cup with intention alone. We move fingers and toes and arms, and from that narrow channel we have to scheme our way to doing anything physical.
"The normal case for consciousness in this framework is not to be embodied."
"In this mathematics, it's measure zero, probability zero."
"It dovetails with a lot of religious stories around the quote-unquote fall of man."
"To get to the moon, all I can do is move my fingers, my toes, my arms."
"It's low bandwidth and high latency."
"It's sort of like you can play the game of consciousness and move things around, but you're so restricted."
Episode dropping today.