@themancalledroy@KelRobin_5 Cincy was alerted to his betting in August of 24 meaning they played him for two years knowing what he was doing, look it up it’s true
@AllbrightNFL@AndrewPDoak It’s the Tech page reposting a On3 article regarding their team, sorry for not digging up the original article but the NCAA referenced this exact claim in the court case
@ColoHawkeye@DanWetzel@espn Both schools did appeal to have their eligibility reinstated, the only difference is the players didn’t independently sue for their eligibility
The schools would have 100 percent played them if they had their eligibility reinstated
@Ricci1Jerome@mckenzielaw Well considering he was the number 1 player in the portal and there was no story about the gambling until after spring practices, I’d say it probably wasn’t common knowledge
@WVUjihad People were mad but there were no calls for boycotts, considering the ncaa admitted there was no integrity of the game issue in the sorsby case the outrage is crazy.
@WVUjihad Yeah but the outrage is very different
If this was really about the integrity of the game people would have been way more upset over the Michigan cheating scandal
@WVUjihad Pro players playing has always been against the rules until the courts said it was ok, there was always hard caps on eligibility until the courts said it was ok. The NCAA literally denied the claims of those players too before they went to the courts
@5thDownCFB But they did try and appeal the decision and have their eligibility reinstated. So they didn’t stand on some moral high ground and pretend they didn’t still want them to play