Autry

Author & Speaker |

[Autry @Autry]

I'd rather drive six hours in traffic than get on a commercial flight. And I fly first class. That should alarm every free-market conservative in the country.

[Autry @Autry]

@gothburz @MarkHalperin is this accurate?

[Autry @Autry]

@james_ptweets1 Largely agree. But if high speed rail ends up publicly owned in the same system, it just becomes Amtrak with better engines. Same degraded service, same attitude, give it ten years. The issue isn't the mode of transportation. It's what the system does to everything it touches.

[Autry @Autry]

I'd rather drive six hours in traffic than get on a commercial flight. And I fly first class. That should alarm every free-market conservative in the country.

[Autry @Autry]

Full piece on my Substack. Free. No paywall. https://t.co/L1AMA6qYPR

[Autry @Autry]

The progressive left's diagnosis is uncomfortably close to correct. Their prescription will kill the patient. But if we don't offer something better than "trust the market while the market treats you like cargo," we will lose this argument. And we'll deserve to.

[Autry @Autry]

We Don’t Fight Real Wars Anymore

What we’re doing right now in Iran is targeting a government while trying not to touch the people. That sounds noble. Maybe it is. But it also might be why we don’t win anymore.

I’m not a war expert. I haven’t read 200 books on World War II. I’ve got friends who have. They can name every battle, every general, every treaty.

But I can see something simple that most of them won’t say out loud.

We don’t fight real wars anymore.

Think about what war used to be. Ugly. Total. Cities got leveled. Civilians died by the tens of thousands. And in that horror, populations turned on their own leaders. They said: end this before we have nothing left. The people became the pressure. The war created its own resolution.

We don’t do that now. We’ve separated governments from their people. We precision-strike military targets. We avoid civilian casualties — and maybe we should.

But in doing so, we’ve removed the one mechanism that historically forced regimes to fall from the inside.

Look at Iran right now. We’re hitting targets. We’re applying pressure. But the Iranian people aren’t in the streets demanding their government surrender. Why would they? The war isn’t reaching them the way wars used to.

Russia is learning the same lesson in Ukraine. Real country. Real borders. Real government. Real resolve. You can’t drone-strike a nation into submission when its people aren’t broken.

This is the paradox of modern warfare: we’ve made it more humane, and in doing so, we may have made it unwinnable.

Unless you’re willing to do the unthinkable — and no one should want that — you don’t really win wars anymore.

You just shift burdens.

[MERICA MEMED @Mericamemed]

I would pay good money to see this movie 😂

[Miranda Devine @mirandadevine]

You have to admit that's a great cover

[Autry @Autry]

Check out my latest article: China Innovated Government Before We Innovated AI https://t.co/ORMtx5yEBo via @LinkedIn

[One America News @OANN]

Are the U.S. and China headed toward a rare earth mineral war? Fmr. Trump Campaign Surrogate and Chairman of New Journey PAC @Autry tells @RileyLewis760 that he believes the U.S. and China are headed toward a war for rare earth minerals, rather than a trade war on @TheRealStoryOAN.

Watch OAN Live Here: https://t.co/ToFbT8JmpC

[Autry @Autry]

Is this true? But yet you put some Ten Commandments out and people flip their s—t

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

Dearborn, Michigan resident posts what they’re forced to listen to

5 times a day they must listen to the Muslim call to prayer blasted throughout their city

Just listen to how loud this is. How is this allowed to exist in America??

[I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 @ImMeme0]

Just hours after Tucker Carlson was fired from Fox News, AOC declared “Deplatforming works and it is important."

[Nick Freitas @NickJFreitas]

I am told that as a state representative this is the moment where I'm supposed to express my heartfelt condolences and then stand in solidarity with those on the other side of the aisle as we condemn political violence and stand unified as one people.

But we aren't "one people" are we?

The truth is we haven't been for some time now, and there is really no point in pretending anymore, if there ever was.

We are two very different peoples. We may occupy the same piece of geography, but that is where the similarities seem to abruptly end.

I convinced myself for a long time that whenever the left called me a racist, a bigot, a sexist, a fascist, a "threat to democracy" for even the most innocent of disagreements, that it was simply hyperbolic rhetoric done for effect.

And now the "effect" is a widow and two orphaned children, because the left couldn’t bear the thought of a peaceful man debating them and winning.

I don’t think they realize it yet, but murdering Charlie is going to be remembered as the day where we finally woke up to what this fight really is.

It’s not a civil dispute among fellow countrymen. It’s a war between diametrically opposed worldviews which cannot peacefully coexist with one another. One side will win, and one side will lose.

Charlie tried to win that fight through argumentation, through discussion, through peaceful resolution of differences.

And the other side murdered him.

Not because he was “extreme” or “inciting violence” or any other hyperbolic slur they hurled at him. They murdered him because he was effective. Because he was unafraid. Because he inspired others and made them feel like they had a voice, that they were not alone. And he did it at the very institutions which have fomented so much hatred toward conservatives.

I don’t want to “stand in solidarity” with the other side of the aisle. I want to defeat you. I want to defeat the godless ideology that kills babies in the womb, sterilizes confused children, turns our cities into cesspools of degeneracy and lawlessness…and that murdered Charlie Kirk.

Social media is aflame right now with leftist celebration of Charlie’s death.

I wonder if any among them understand what has just happened. If there is a Yamamoto somewhere in their midst warning, that all they have done is awoken a sleeping giant.

I doubt it. I think they gave up such introspection and self-awareness long ago.

I don’t know exactly what will happen next. I just know that it won’t be the same as what has happened in the past.

There will be thoughts and prayers…Charlie would have wanted prayers. Not for himself but for those left behind and for the country that he loved.

But then there will be a reckoning.

My Christian faith requires me to love my enemies and pray for those who curse me. It does not require me to stand idly by in the midst of savagery and barbarism...quite the opposite.

So every time I feel tired, every time I feel discouraged or overwhelmed, I am going to watch the video of a good man being murdered in Utah…I will force myself to watch it…and then I will return to the work of destroying the evil ideology responsible for that and so much more.

Rest with God Charlie, your fight is over.

Ours is just beginning.

[Autry @Autry]

⁦@realDonaldTrump⁩ got liberals to start defending High-Fructose Corn Syrup. 🙄🤣

[Autry @Autry]

@OpenAI @elonmusk

I’m proposing a feature called “Continuous Chat” that allows users to hold one ongoing conversation across time, with ChatGPT /Grok/automatically detecting topic changes and organizing them accordingly.
Rather than starting a new thread for every subject, the user would interact in a single thread. The system would:
•Detect topic shifts (e.g., theology → fasting → Dubai travel)
•Auto-group those into categorized subthreads
•Link related discussions across time into categories or timelines (e.g., “Wellness,” “Jet Ownership,” “China Travel”)
•Allow users to optionally label or merge categories, or view summaries by topic
This feature would make ChatGPT a true memory-extension tool—ideal for journaling, research, strategic planning, and long-form personal use.
It transforms ChatGPT from a reactive chatbot into a dynamic, thought-organizing assistant. The current interface loses continuity across topics and fragments long-term insights.
Even a simple implementation—topic detection and grouping view—would dramatically improve retention, usability, and user satisfaction.
I’m not a developer, but I’d be happy to talk with the product team or provide further insight if needed. I’d also appreciate attribution or consideration if the idea is useful in future development.

[Autry @Autry]

I don’t care where the table is, who set it, or how many stars hang above it. If I don’t remember what I ate, you didn’t serve anything worth remembering.

[Autry @Autry]

I walked outside in the Middle East and the heat blinded me. Not the light—the heat. It’s so F’ing hot here you can see the damn HEAT!