Aye Sha

Feminist. Muslim. Strong.

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

毛主席万岁，毛泽东同志逝世50周年纪念。

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

@tedlieu @realDonaldTrump That hasn't stopped any president dkmce clinton from using military force though. So don't count it out.

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

@mariasstudyblr @Colossis2 Show me one legitmate Christian scholar that has interpreted either to require followers to harm nonbelievers. Shows you haven't read NT

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

@Colossis2 @mariasstudyblr @insertdedmeme It seems to me that Islam advocates for much more violence than Christianity. Several rational interpretations include some violence

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

@Colossis2 @mariasstudyblr @insertdedmeme I agree with that. But Christianity generally believes that the old law of the OT was traded in for the new law of the NT.

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

@Colossis2 @mariasstudyblr @insertdedmeme My point is merely that new testament Christianity does not advocate for believer violence.

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

@Colossis2 @mariasstudyblr @insertdedmeme Clear interpretation is that someday Jesus will certainly be violent to nonbelievers. Aka judgment day. No call for followers to act at all

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

@Colossis2 @mariasstudyblr @insertdedmeme And those somehow are telling his followers to be violent? Historically no people have interpreted either of those to mean that

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

@Colossis2 @mariasstudyblr @insertdedmeme That's very true... but also remember that those are only two of many hundreds of religions

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

@Colossis2 @mariasstudyblr @insertdedmeme I'm not familiar with what verse you are quoting.

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

@Colossis2 @mariasstudyblr @insertdedmeme Uhh where are you getting that from? The new testament is widely interpreted as advocating only peaceful evangelism

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

@Colossis2 @mariasstudyblr @insertdedmeme Ironic. Many atheists (disbelieving religion) then enforce their views upon theists... historically often through violence (ex. Stalin)

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

@Colossis2 @mariasstudyblr @insertdedmeme It's also ironic. You are arguing definitions while your graphic states that arguing them is merely a distraction.

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

@Fishtiks @Colossis2 @insertdedmeme @mariasstudyblr You insulted him... which had no bearing in the discussion. It was uncalled for an immature. Discuss philosophy not personal statements

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

@Fishtiks @Colossis2 @insertdedmeme @mariasstudyblr I don't argue with that. I just don't a point in discussing his social life. That has little bearing on the intellectual argument

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

@Fishtiks @Colossis2 @insertdedmeme @mariasstudyblr You know nothing about his social life. Discussing that seems pointless and immature.

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

@Fishtiks @Colossis2 @insertdedmeme @mariasstudyblr Ad hominem? At least rebut his points rather than resort to that immaturity

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

@Colossis2 @insertdedmeme @mariasstudyblr Belief or lack thereof is a belief pattern. Negative and affirmative belief are two sides of the same coin. Stop quibbling with language.

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

@Colossis2 @mariasstudyblr @insertdedmeme It is a belief pattern... how can you disagree with that? Your picture even confirms that. You're quibbling on verbage now

[Aye Sha @Aye_Sha69]

@TheGayHumanist Referring to someone as a bitch is a sexist and dehumanizing comment. Regardless of how heinous that person is. Be more sensitive!