M.T Lawal

[A.Y.O @YusufAsunmogejo]

Excuse me sir, what you said has zero place in knowledge. I once asked here if you are you a Muslim or not, so as to know where many of your strange views come from, people said you are.

If anything would be regarded as truth about Adam and Eve, it has to be from no other source than the one who created them. Painfully, you didn't cite any source.

Is what he said true?

First of all, where did this strange idea come from? I say this because this "euphemism for sex" idea has no foundation in either Islamic or Judeo-Christian theology.

This thought process was cooked up by ancient Gnostic cults and later amplified by sects, such as the Manichaeans. These ancient groups believed the physical world, the human body, and the act of procreation were inherently evil and dirty.

Because they had a theological hatred for human intimacy, they twisted the creation story. They decided the original sin could not be about eating a literal fruit, so they reimagined it as sexual intercourse.

They turned the tree and the fruit into metaphors to fit their own skewed hatred for the body. Today, people pick up this corrupted Gnostic idea and repeat it online thinking it makes them sound deep and enlightened.

As a Muslim that you are, you should know that we do not play/relate these esoteric Batiniyya games with clear revelation. The Almighty called it a tree. The Arabic word used is Shajarah. He told them do not approach this tree. When they slipped, the Quran clearly says they ate from it.

If we test his euphemism theory against the Quranic timeline, the whole logic crashes. The Quran states that it was only after they ate from the tree that their nakedness became visible to them. That was when they started hastily covering themselves with the leaves of Paradise.

Think about the sequence of events here. If the fruit was a euphemism for sexual intimacy, how could they only realize they were naked after the act was completed? Only the true believers will reason about this.

Also, Islam does not view lawful intimacy as a sin. Adam and Hawa were created to eventually populate the earth. There is no theological reason to hide a natural act behind a metaphorical fruit.

Even if you read the Bible, the chronological assertions are well documented. If you read the Book of Genesis, it calls it the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

The original Hebrew text uses the word peri, which translates to a literal, physical fruit. Early Jewish scholars debated if it was a fig, a stalk of wheat, a pomegranate, or a grape, but they all firmly agreed it was a physical crop meant for consumption. None of the arguments were based on euphemisms.

Even more damaging to your theory is the Biblical timeline itself. In the very first chapter of Genesis, before the fall even happens, God commands them to "be fruitful and multiply." Intimacy was already blessed and commanded by God in the Biblical text.

It was not the forbidden crime. The crime was a literal act of disobedience through eating what was forbidden.

We need to be very careful with assuming borrowed or corrupted knowledge is true knowledge. Like I said earlier, what you said has no place in true knowledge. Your opinion is that from the transgressors and people of mischief.

Whether you are looking at it through an Islamic lens, Jewish or a Biblical one, it was a physical tree and a physical act of eating. Any other interpretation is a corrupt one.

Allah knows best.

[M.T Lawal @Baarak66]

You are actually wrong and tou need to correct yourselfon this, you don't do Tahweel (metaphorical transformation or deviation) when it comes to the verses of Qur'an like the Zahiriyah. No true scholars of Islam past and present Either sunni or Shia will tell you same thing you posted brother. If Allah says anything, you must believe it as it is. He says he has 2 hands an dthey are both right hands, believe it without think how or where or why. Many verses in the Qur'an says they ate from the tree. Allah knows best.

[Assim Alhakeem @Assimalhakeem]

A word of advice to our Muslim influencers and celebrities:

1- Life is short and it is a test as Allah stated in the Quran in many places.

2- Ali may Allah be pleased with him, the cousin of the prophet salla Allahu alaihi wa sallam and the 4th Caliph said:

And if we were to be set free after we die, then death would be a relief for everyone
The problem is that when we die, we are resurrected, and after that, we are questioned about every thing!

3- Fame is blinding and deafening. It makes
us lose our senses till wrong becomes right and sins become the norm in our lives. This is when we become "comfortably numb"!

4- Gaining likes and more followers is the sole objective in life to most our Muslim celebrities. They don’t care whether this pleases Allah or angers Him! Fame is quick sand that sucks you in with every move you make.

5- People may complement you for your charm, your beautiy or your art and to tell the truth, you might be gifted in all of that. The problem is: would all of that benefit you in your grave and on the day of judgment or would it only further your descent in hell?

5- Look at all the celebrities and influencers 20 or 30 years before you. Where are they now and where is their fame, charm and admirers?

They are all forgotten and only Allah knows what is happening to them in their graves as we speak.

6- It doesn’t matter what people say about you as there will always be people who adore you and people who hate your guts.

What really counts is: What does Allah say about you?

[القرآن الکریم @Al_Quran_011]

reposts, it will help you❤🎧🕊️

[Gramvoice @Gramvoicehq]

This Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra could be yours!

Just follow these simple steps to stand a chance to win it:

• Follow @gramvoicehq
• Follow @jacob_gramvoice
• Retweet this post

Do these three easy things today for your chance to win the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra!

[M.T Lawal @Baarak66]

The religion of Islam had many Messengers, peace be upon them all, right from Prophet Adam to the last which is Prophet Muhammad SAW. They all brought the same message which the greatest of it all is (oneness of Allah). There are other similarities in their messages.

You've not said anything new to us. Many prophet were not given new book, like in Quran 5 vs44, all those that came after Prophet Moses, preach the same Tohrah of Moses, they were not given any new book. Prophet I'sa came with a new book but he was instructed to preach the same Tohrah but in addition with another book, Injil, to make lawful to them some forbidden things, Quran 3 vs 50.

The Last revelation/ book which is Quran confirmed the presence of the previous revelations and was made Supreme authority over them. Quran 5 vs 48. Prophet Muhammad was not instructed to follow those books but to only confirm their presence.

We muslim does not need anything from those books. We only beleived they were revealed. And to find some similar messages in some text to be the same with the Qur'an is not something new cos all prophet brought the same me (Islamic Monotheism i.e Oneness of Allah).

[M.T Lawal @Baarak66]

@Crowns0071 I read she died last week.

[القرآن @Quranconnect_]

I couldn’t keep this to myself. 🥹🤍

Wallahi, the Qur’an is from Allah. No book reaches the heart the way it does. It’s as if every verse speaks directly to you. 🕊️😭

[M.T Lawal @Baarak66]

https://t.co/GGAlCLSP7v

[M.T Lawal @Baarak66]

https://t.co/d1B2SyZAIu

[M.T Lawal @Baarak66]

https://t.co/30ZXVkVLI1

[M.T Lawal @Baarak66]

https://t.co/EmN0X2hNbm

[M.T Lawal @Baarak66]

https://t.co/d1B2SyZAIu

[M.T Lawal @Baarak66]

https://t.co/30ZXVkVLI1

[M.T Lawal @Baarak66]

https://t.co/EmN0X2hNbm

[M.T Lawal @Baarak66]

https://t.co/GGAlCLSP7v

[JJ. Omojuwa @Omojuwa]

Hmmmnn, the things I am hearing about the Argentina v Egypt World Cup game are simply incredible. FIFA never planned to rig it until something incredible happened.

At kickoff, they used the normal World Cup ball. An upset was on the cards. 67th minute, Argentina 0, Egypt 2. Earlier, at 1-0, the Head of FIFA’s Agenda and Marketing Committee, Mr Youare Diputs, had called FIFA President Infantino to say they needed to step in. Infantino told him there was no need, that Messi would rescue the game organically.

Then the game became 2-0, so during the second hydration break, Infantino himself made the call to the Head of the Match Ball Control Centre, Mr Etelpmoc Toidi, to switch to the Magnetic Enhancer Ball (MEB). People don’t know about this ball.

The MEB is the sort of ball that, irrespective of what is being played on the pitch, the FIFA Play Radius Team (PRT) can steer ball movement however they want. Note that they don’t control the players. Only the ball.

In the 79th minute, they made the ball travel from Messi to Romero because they wanted something specific; a Messi assist would help him break the World Cup assist record. Watch Romero’s header again. His head flicked the ball towards the corner flag. The ball went into the net anyway. Watch in slow motion, you will see the ball movement defy physics.

By the 83rd minute, they steered the ball off Messi’s leg and into the net for 2-2. During the celebrations, they removed the MEB because they trusted Argentina to take it from there.

What happened next shocked even FIFA. They had banked on the game going to penalties. But Enzo Fernández, remembering he needed to score to stay in the minds of whoever will rescue him from Chelsea, scored a great goal. I must stress this: that one came off the regular match ball. 3-2. Argentina were home and dry.

So when you hear people say the game was rigged for Messi and Argentina, this is what happened. Someone said, “but it wasn’t rigged when Egypt were 2-0 up.” Well, you know now.

PS: One clarification, specifically for the global avalanche of idiots. I made all of this up, obviously. But if you believed it for even a paragraph, reverse the letters of the officials’ names. That’s you.

[M.T Lawal @Baarak66]

@israel_obasola 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣

[M.T Lawal @Baarak66]

@realDonaldTrump 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂😂

[bellaadinda @bellaadinnda]

illustration of the reality of the world of work