This is Sheikh Farouk Ramadan.
Yesterday afternoon, he and his family were attacked by settler-terrorists on their own land. Farouk managed to disarm one of the attackers. He took the settler's rifle and shot and killed two terrorists in a clear act of self-defence.
In response, Israeli soldiers murdered him and three of his family members. Israeli government and media portrays him as the terrorist, and the actual terrorists as the victims.
Don't let them push this narrative. Farouk had the full legal and moral right to resist against the genocidal terrorists who invaded his land.
Daniel haqiqatjou has better manners with those who:
- curse mother Aisha
- curse Abu bakr
- curse Umar
- venerate the killer of Umar
- call upon the dead
than he does with the scholars of Islam
And you’ll still have Muslims out here within his little fan group treating him as some reviver of the faith
One of the things I love about the works of sheikh Muhammad ibn abd al Wahhab
And part of what makes it so simple to digest
Whether it be through reading his books or listening to lectures explaining his books
Is that they have the same formula over and over and over again
- point
- evidence
- point
- evidence
- point
- evidence
And the evidence is almost always:
1) “Allah said”
OR
2) “The messenger ﷺ said”
And the few times it isn’t either of these, it’s “such and such sahabi said” or “such and such scholar from the established scholars said” or “such and such from the tabi’een said”
Take his books, remove his name from it, hand it to one of his detractors from the people of innovation and they would look at you in amazement
“what an amazing book, all it does is provide points based on ‘Allah said’ and ‘the nabi ﷺ said’”