I don’t think any rational individual will watch someone like Lionel Messi and believe there’s anyone better EVER.
Yes , I’m a Ronaldo fan but I wan make heaven
Only you 1,
Supported France, they lost
Supporter Portugal, They lost.
Supported Columbia, they Lost
Support Egypt, they lost
Supported Switzerland, They lost.
Supported France, they lost.
Tonight, Supported England, they have lost.
All eyes have seen, All ears have heard and all tongues shall testify that Messi is the true GOAT.
This is just the difference between Messi and Ronaldo.
When Argentina needed a goal, Messi pulled out from the 18 and started playing from deep outside the box.
He was asking for every ball and pushing every player to better positions.
He knew the England defense defense had been set-up to stop all run-ins into the 18.
He started delivering world class crosses that the England defense lines.
Ronaldo cannot try this. He'll rather remain inside the box and be raising hand like person that fell into a pit.
When Messi ask for the ball, they give him. When Messi comes close they leave the ball for him.
Authority. King of the pitch.
I've been saying it since that Messi carries this team, not the team carrying Messi.
Argentina are fighters. They know how to suffer. Messi is the greatest player of all time. The assists never stop coming. Nobody should claim that FIFA helped Argentina here.
9 & 2 - Lionel Messi completed nine dribbles and assisted two goals against England - the first player on record (from 1966) to do so in a single FIFA World Cup knockout game.
Catalyst.
After this tournament if you say with a clear conscience that Messi is not the greatest player you've ever watched you're lying. Walahi you're lying. I give up.
These polarising conversations about the impropriety of speaking ill of the dead are merely a reflection of the moral pluralism that governs us. We are a people of clashing orientations, but I believe these contrasts should not invite the chaos of perspectives and the name-calling that often follows.
For the religious, the line between public service and posthumous accounts of those entrusted with leadership will always be an uncomfortable subject. The contradiction, however, lies in expecting silence on the legacy of a person whose decisions influenced the welfare of society, whether for good or bad.
To submit yourself to public service is to subject yourself to a lifetime of scrutiny. I think supporters of public servants need to come to terms with this. While it is noble to draw the line when even your worst adversary passes on, we must understand that our moral code is not the law of the universe.
A public servant is not a private citizen, and so his story does not end with his demise. He is already a character in the story of his society, and whether you like it or not, his place can never be vacant in the records of his nation.
Your religion’s aversion to speaking ill of the dead does not mean that lies should be told about them, or that their chapters should be erased. It’s also not a denial of their actions. It simply means that the deceased has gone on to face the highest form of judgment. This is a complex issue because not everyone believes in life after death, so now you understand those who pursue earthly judgment for those who had wronged them.
Two truths can exist side by side. There is the truth of those who have outsourced final judgment to God, and that of those who refuse to be bound by the sentimentality of never speaking ill of the dead. In the end, it is the truth of the latter that sparks debate on the legacy of past leaders, whether they are remembered as heroes or villains. This should also remind discerning future leaders to live in ways that earn them favourable eulogies when their Creator calls them home.
We should not live with the confidence that society will forgive us when we are gone. We should strive to be fair in all our dealings and ensure that the imperfections we leave behind are unintentional, rather than the outcome of a deliberate resolve to harm those we were entrusted to protect.