Russell Brand’s Dad, Ron. Responded to a reporters question about an accuser;
"The victim? What, Russell?"
Like MANY people, Ron believes Russell is victim to a media led witch hunt, which has subverted and weaponised His Majesty’s Court Service.
Speaking of Russell’s accusers, Ron Brand said;
"The girls you mean, who chased him and harrassed him - is that what you mean?"
I was on the scene in the naughties. Girls would throw themselves at celebrities, not just Russell. Some sold dishonest or inflated kiss and tell stories to tabloids. Others dreamed of sharing the glamorous life, they wanted to pose next to their famous conquests on red carpets.
The women who were celebrity groupies behaved just as badly as the stars they chased. Many were on drugs. Some would do adult entertainment work and spend the money on plastic surgeries.
Fantasists with severe mental health issues and Daddy issues.
The media reporting on this case has been one sided. Sinisterly portraying Russell as a monster and the accusers who may have felt scorned, when discarded for the next conquest, as "brave".
It’s not brave for them to wait over a decade to seek justice. IF a crime occurred, they betrayed other women by not going to the police, many years ago.
Who can say these are not the same kind of opportunists, who sold kiss and tell stories to the same tabloids which praised Brand’s shagging?
Who can say they are of a different profile to glamour girls who bedded celebrities in the hopes of becoming a trophy wife?
The naughties was the time when WAGs (Wives and Girlfriends of famous footballers, were given their own reality TV shows.)
Justice has not been served! Hopefully Russell’s legal team can appeal the verdict.
1. Evidence didn't show mens rea
2. Time delay
3. Changing standard of proof
4. Trial by media
5. The remarks by the PM before jury decision
6. The anonymity
7. The comparison to child sex ABUSERS who get SUSPENDED SENTENCES...
IT'S A STITCH UP.... WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY?
@Kate14772198942 That’s not what I said, no. More simply put, you’re confusing *proven* false, with *total* false. It’s the first number that shows up on Google with Google AI concluding that false accusations are rare when that simply isn’t true.
@BadCapitalist69@archivesincompl@CNN I’m not defending false claims. However, Peer-reviewed studies & criminological research consistently show false reports of rape are rare, generally accounting for only 2%-10% of all reported cases. This rate is comparable to the false reporting rate for most other types of crime
@Kate14772198942 Okay fine. But once I explain it you have to actually promise to humble yourself and start doing more of your own research in the future okay?
That 2-10% you’re referring to are only cases proven false. It leaves out 90%+ of cases. 7 in 100 reach conviction = 99.3%.
@JamessWhitmore@SturdyHausFrau@Final_Revo@DeeWaynee94 You still haven’t given a valid argument though. So far the only applicable thing you’ve actually said is “he’s an admitted sexual deviant”, but you realize sexual deviancy could literally be a blow job. Deviating from what norm? Y so angry suddenly?
@rfwalsh86@SturdyHausFrau@FionaSmall Aw did baby get wittle uncomfy? This isn’t about your feelings, faggot. This is about not hurting innocent people. Now you’re lying about blocking? Fuck right off and grow up, CHILD.